Why is bt not as effective as whirwind, reading the post it seems like ww>bt>slam (hs on 60+rage)?
Not only does whirlwind cost less rage than BT, it's average DPS is also higher.
Does doing a HS affect ww or bt?
What? You can queue a heroic strike and still BT, if that's what you mean.
What rotation is the best, what would you start out with and why? Is there any math behind what you put off or what you delay or is it a gut feeling? I know some have covered this but I kinda would like to see the math and decisions behind it.
You answered your own question earlier. WW>BT>Slam(On BS procs) and HS when you're at a comfortable amount of rage (60+). The reasoning is common sense. WW hits harder and has a longer CD than BT. This means, pushing back WW with a BT would cause a loss in dps.
Taking the GC into consideration if you have a slam up, ww up in .5 secs, and a bt up in 1 sec what do you go with and why.
You would WW then BT. If you still have the bloodsurge proc, then slam.