If the posts suck, report them. If they don't, don't be an asshole.
Originally Posted by Wakeman
Of course I know that you know it is a misnomer. I already said you had mentioned it. Nevertheless, it is just misleading to use this as the title of the section. You can simply use "Uncrittable" or "Crit Immune" or something like that as the title and add a small print "aka Defense Cap" below it. Currently the title only has the term Defense Cap, which makes newbies like Griefknight think that it is no good or even laughable to have defense beyond 540.
In the old time when everyone were using the word uncrittable, you could ask the pug tank "are you uncrittable?" and he would understand what you meant. I see no advantage to use "defense cap" now over "uncrittable".
Another problem with the word Defense Cap is you don't need to reach the Defense Cap to be Defense Capped. For new tanks gearing up for the last few defense to be uncrittable, they can use one or two pieces of resilience gear to fill up the gap. Not that I recommend this but I only want to point out the fact that how confusing is the term Defense Cap here.
Look at this another Glass Joe name calling to prove a point? This is new and exciting on the EJ forums.
This argument is completely pointless, people can call 540 defense what they want regardless of what it means. I have no problem calling it crit immune or defense cap because they mean the same thing (to have at least 540 defense). I personally find no reason to go beyond 540 defense, like I've said before. You and obviously other believe there is a reason to do so. I think we have covered this and that we can move on to discuss more important topics then a title for a 540 defense.