Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Urban Rivals
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer
Elitist Jerks Login

gamerDNA Login

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
We're testing some new features on the site regarding OpenID registration and coordination with gamerDNA. If you experience any issues with registering an account, please take the time to fill out a report and send it to this e-mail address. We would appreciate any assistance you could provide in making sure everything is functioning as intended. Thanks!

If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04/06/09, 12:28 PM   #1
 Juice
Natural Male Enhancement
 
Juice's Avatar
 
Orc Shaman
 
Mal'Ganis
Infraction for kraftykiller: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly.

Post: [Warrior] PvP & Arena
User: kraftykiller
Infraction: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly.
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
You posted 3 in a row, simply to get around the rule against quote splitting. The reason we have the quote splitting rule is so people don't nitpick and respond to stupid shit...like you did to my satyrical post in the one above this one. Infraction coming on that too.
Original Post:
Originally Posted by Bal View Post
With the new changes to Arms and the appeal of staying in battle stance over beserker (ArP, Juggernaught, Shattering Throw, OP, etc.), is it unfair to want the PvP set bonus to affect Charge as well? It seems pretty pointless to me atm to have a 4-piece bonus that affects only one ability in a specific stance.
I won't complain if blizz gave charge a 4 piece bonus of some type but don't forget charge gives you rage while intecept uses it up. Just being able to charge while in combat is going to be huge and if the stance changes go through (for good and bad) you will be able to intercept.. burn your rage and back to battle stance for a charge (CD probably be ready after you get off a couple attacks in zerker stance).
 
User is offline.
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infraction for mih: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. bartolimu The Banhammer 0 04/06/09 11:52 AM
Infraction for NCH: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. constantius The Banhammer 0 03/25/09 8:19 PM
Infraction for gne: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. bartolimu The Banhammer 0 02/18/09 6:57 PM
Infraction for Jrk: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. Vulajin The Banhammer 0 02/17/09 5:00 PM
Infraction for ztn: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. Aldriana The Banhammer 0 02/02/09 8:00 PM