Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04/20/09, 3:07 PM   #1
• Aldriana
Mike Tyson
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Doomhammer
Warning for ash2ash: 2. All opinions should be stated as succinctly as possible.

Post: Ulduar
User: ash2ash
Infraction: 2. All opinions should be stated as succinctly as possible.
Points: 0

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
Consecutive posting. I'm merging this post with the one before it.
Original Post:
Originally Posted by KamPa View Post
So, seeing that they're buffing Sappers to prevent some of more "creative" ways of "killing" them - any ideas? I know fear spamming works, but they can still do enormous damage if you leave them alone for split second and it's not like 3 locks will be a standard. It does kind of remind me of Kael, but even those didn't start spinning right after the pull. LOS tricks seem horribly annoying, they drain healers to 0% way too fast and do it too often. Goes double for 10 man, 3 Sappers in single group was major pain and you can't really perma cc them with so little people.
This was by far the most annoying part of the instance for us in 10 man - The first two pack, we rooted one, pulled the other, and chain stunned/fear dps'd it to death then did the same to the second one.

The pack of 3, we moved the raid almost to the beginning of the wing, had a druid root-pull, then a warrior charged and tanked the second add, while we dps'd the third add safely away from the other two.

The last pack, we had a warrior charge in and shield wall while a DK death gripped one out of LOS and we dps'd that one down then switched to the next. Seems to be that these guys you basically have to get them to the point where you only have one of them in your raid, then it becomes manegable.

Offline
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Warning for 4LV: 2. All opinions should be stated as succinctly as possible. Vykromond The Banhammer 0 04/14/09 6:46 PM
Warning for SlyyyC: 2. All opinions should be stated as succinctly as possible. Vykromond The Banhammer 0 03/12/09 3:56 PM
Warning for Todesunke: 2. All opinions should be stated as succinctly as possible. Aldriana The Banhammer 0 02/25/09 12:39 PM
Warning for Purinna: 2. All opinions should be stated as succinctly as possible. LodeRunner The Banhammer 0 02/24/09 6:44 PM
Warning for Psy: 2. All opinions should be stated as succinctly as possible. Tehax The Banhammer 0 02/20/09 1:54 PM