And at least one posted wasted attempting to backseat moderate.
Originally Posted by Jellex
In the course of that discussion, one person claimed that this approach was wrong, said that the math showing that expertise and hit were valued over or near equal to strength until cap was also wrong, and that "he and other prominent Ret Paladins from BWL days" had proven that 180ish hit, 14 expertise, 4pcT7 and strength stacking were superior to capping hit and expertise. Now, since he showed no math, I'm inclined to disbelieve him, but math is very much not my strong suit, and so I figured to ask people who know what they are about; is there any grain of truth in this claim, or is this just the work of someone trying very hard not to be wrong?
Why did you type this out? You already know the answer. There are already 3 wasted pages in this very thread discussing hit and expertise.