Originally Posted by Braque

I'm pretty sure I did try to explain/defend the reasoning, but apparently, based on the incorrect descriptions of the sheet repeated here, people are having trouble understanding it. Is it worth me repeating it? Probably not, sadly the board seems overwhelmingly hostile to new models, and it's hard work to keep a positive attitude. A possible reason that crit might be 'overvalued' would be my treatment of throughput and 'full duration' values as being equal, but given I've not yet had any mana problems that seemed fair. I could add a slider for that. What weightings do you get from your model, given similar start values as I'm using? Do you think there is any genuine error in the mechanics modeling? Or is it just the system I use to go from 'results' to 'stat weightings'? Seeing as all criticism has been of the weighting model can I assume the mechanics appear solid?