| constantius |
06/26/09 4:40 PM |
Warning for Sprout: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say.
Post: [Resto] 3.2 changes and Discussion
User: Sprout
Infraction: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say.
Points: 0
Administrative Note:
Message to User:
Quote:
If you quote something that big, it better be relevant. You could easily have snipped that to save space.
|
Original Post:
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vuldunobetra
(Post 1288904)
Consider these numbers a quick back-of-envelope calculations, not double checked.
Assumptions 3000 SP, 40% crit rate, TW always up, all relevant talents, 1.25s GCD, 1.4s HW (the numbers Sprout gave)
| LHW | 4880 | | LHW/crit | 7321 | | LHW/AA | 2196 | | LHW Average | 7894 | | | | | LHW+ES | 5856 | | LHW/crit | 8785 | | LHW/AA | 2636 | | LHW Average | 9473 | | | | | HW | 11940 | | HW/crit | 17911 | | HW/AA | 5373 | | HW Average | 16478 | | | | | LHW HPM | 18.65 | | LHW+ES HPM | 22.38 | | HW HPM | 17.93 | | | | | LHW HPS | 6315 | | LHW+ES HPS | 7578 | | HW HPS | 11770 |
LHW is our quicker, more efficient spell. HW is our big throughput spell.
|
Thanks for the numbers V, but I think you need to include RT in there. If you dont the HPM and HPS numbers are skewed. If you assume TW up 100% then you have to assume RT/LJW/LHW or CH/LHW/LHW. Thats why I wanted to use a spreadsheet to look at the HPM/HPs value . that doesnt even take into account the various totems involved.
|
|
