Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10/27/09, 1:45 PM   #1
• Aldriana
Mike Tyson
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Doomhammer
Infraction for Bensch78: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil.

Post: Unholy Dps | Scourge Strike, All I Ever Wanted
User: Bensch78
Infraction: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil.
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
Stop being a dick.
Original Post:
Originally Posted by Luna-tics View Post
People are on the ptr testing SS and getting those numbers. Have you been getting anything different? If not, don't post saying everyone else is wrong without anything to back your information up. 3.2.2 you might be doing 8.2k dps but with the nerfs to other talents, that drops, which is why SS is doing more damage to make up for it. All you're doing is adding the SS dps to your old numbers and not accounting for the other nerfs. Unless you have proof from the ptr that the numbers other people are getting from the ptr are wrong, don't post.
I am doing the sims with 3.3 conditions and without, and i know how to do it. I have done hundreds of sims before with the simulator in 3.2.2 and posted my results to prove, that epidemic and reaping are not worth it in 3.2.2.

And now you come here and tell me, how to actually do sims? I did the sims with the same numbers i used pages ago. I am not just adding numbers. But I think, you did not even see them, as you are just responding to this one post, without actually taking part in the whole discussion.

Look at this post to see the PTR numbers: http://elitistjerks.com/f72/t72364-u...9/#post1432781

Look at this post to see the Sim numbers as of 1.1.7.2 http://elitistjerks.com/f72/t72364-u...9/#post1432051

See the difference? Enough proof for you?

Offline
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infraction for magrat: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. Aldriana The Banhammer 0 10/24/09 6:58 AM
Infraction for Ewinessa: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. Kaubel The Banhammer 0 10/13/09 9:50 PM
Infraction for mjball: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. Kaubel The Banhammer 0 08/29/09 9:16 AM
Infraction for XI-: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. LodeRunner The Banhammer 0 07/31/09 2:06 PM
Infraction for conwolv: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. constantius The Banhammer 0 06/26/09 2:50 PM