Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01/16/10, 3:47 AM   #1
♦ Carebare
::stare::
 
Carebare's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Warning for Dourdon: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly.

Post: In-Depth Arms DPS Discussion
User: Dourdon
Infraction: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly.
Points: 0

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
Capitalize and punctuate properly. Kaubel has brought this to your attention previously.
Original Post:
@Serivola:

So i tried your method of opening a boss fight, the berserker stance, recklessness, battle, charge HS thing, and honestly i didnt seem to impressed with it. I mean, i did not see a significant difference in the burst damage or overall damage.

one other thing, I tried integrating more HS in the rotation instead of slam and saw a DPS loss of at least 500 depending on the boss fight. maybe i just havent got the timing of the swing down or something. Either way it wasnt quite working for me.

additionally, I saw a few posts back that slam is absolutely essential in the rotation, when ever you have a chance to hit it, do so... is this still the case or should that not be as high of a priority?

and lastly, I have not seen too many posts on the new T10 peices / bonuses / importance and so forth. Ive heard that the 2 piece bonus is amazing for fury, but how about arms? Im about 50/50 on it but the 4 piece looks amazing for arms...2 procs of execute instead of one, i mean correct me if im wrong but that would pretty much almost eliminate the need to hit a slam as a filler. The second proc would give you that extra 1-2 seconds for anything else to come off CD or proc as well...or are my thoughts totally bass ackwards?

United States Offline
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infraction for Dourdon: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. Kaubel The Banhammer 0 11/21/09 11:13 PM
Warning for aethereal: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. bartolimu The Banhammer 0 05/20/09 11:16 AM
Warning for Energizr: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. constantius The Banhammer 0 03/11/09 9:35 PM
Warning for -Oz-: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. LodeRunner The Banhammer 0 02/24/09 4:29 PM
Warning for Indicate: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. constantius The Banhammer 0 02/06/09 10:32 AM