Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Player vs. Player

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10/04/07, 8:49 PM   #176
Reubarb
Glass Joe
 
Undead Rogue
 
Mal'Ganis
The choke point at Stormpike Graveyard needs to be fixed.

The lack of a choke point at Frostwolf Graveyard needs to be fixed.

In my opinion those are the real problems.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/04/07, 9:16 PM   #177
 sadris
Sell puts!
 
sadris's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Pretty horrible changes overall unless AV group queue is brought back in. I don't think Blizzard realizes how stupid the majority of their customers are.

Last edited by sadris : 10/04/07 at 9:39 PM.

The Washington Post helps perpetuate a common and pernicious misreading of the decision, referring to "the Supreme Court’s judgment that corporations have the same rights as people when it comes to political speech." What the Supreme Court actually said is that people do not lose their free speech rights when they organize as corporations, including nonprofit interest groups as well as businesses.

United States Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/04/07, 9:26 PM   #178
teeny
Von Kaiser
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Archimonde (EU)
Even though some of those changes might be good , i just can't believe they didnt fix the fence-jumping spots on the horde-side base yet.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/04/07, 9:41 PM   #179
Lookit
Piston Honda
 
Lookit's Avatar
 
Human Paladin
 
Skywall
Originally Posted by sadris View Post
Pretty horrible changes overall unless AV group queue is brought back in. I don't think Blizzard realizes how stupid the majority of their customers are.
WoW BlueTracker: Bring back "Join as a group" in AV.

Originally Posted by Tigole
We're considering doing this soon. We have a lot of balance changes in 2.3. We need to see AV on the PTR before re-enabling this. We're not 100% on this decision but we'll do it if we feel like it will be an overall benefit to AV. Sorry to be so vague at this time.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/04/07, 9:55 PM   #180
syeren
Don Flamenco
 
syeren's Avatar
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Stormscale (EU)
Originally Posted by Lookit View Post
Massive changes coming to AV in 2.3:

WoW Forums -> Alterac Valley Changes for Patch 2.3

Being able to win without killing the General.

Penalty to your entire team when you die.

Pulling the General will guarantee all Warmasters are pulled.

Destroying an enemy tower removes one of their Warmasters but does not add one to your side.

The "Reinforcement count" Neth mentions seems to be almost a backwards "Victory Point" counter as in EotS. Say you start at 2000 "Reinforcement count" - each HK the enemy gets reduce your number by 1. Losing Captains and towers reduces it by a significant amount. Losing your General reduces it completely, resulting in a loss.

Fascinating....
Although this change is rather awesome, I'm going to REALLY love this as Alliance... Oh wait, another BG to be slaughtered in due to my incompetent 'team-mates' running around being idiots/themselves -_-

I really would love to play this as Horde though :P

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/04/07, 10:38 PM   #181
Krag
Don Flamenco
 
Tauren Druid
 
Runetotem (EU)
Originally Posted by syeren View Post
Although this change is rather awesome, I'm going to REALLY love this as Alliance... Oh wait, another BG to be slaughtered in due to my incompetent 'team-mates' running around being idiots/themselves -_-

I really would love to play this as Horde though :P
I think you put a little too much faith in the average horde player

Outside of the first AV weekend (where I did win probably 60% of the games) the place has generally been filled with the usually assortment of retards and lemmings horde side and I haven't won a single game since the weekend. Most of the time I spend soloing or duoing the elites just to get them done.

From a Horde perspective and having to defend towers now, I would really like a non-stupid version of them, but on the other hand Alliance might have a real bad time attacking Galvager with a dedicated defense team there.

It will be interesting to see how it plays out, but it's hard to say how it will all balance out before we know how quick games are and how much the new system will impact the honor gain (in conjunction with the extra honor tagged to the end of the other three battlegrounds). If it takes too long get games decided with too much defense it might revert back to Alliance and Horde riding past each other at the Field of Strife racing to get to the enemy base first.

Hopefully we'll get to see in a month or so (yes, I'm an eternally optimistic soul).

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/04/07, 11:26 PM   #182
Cirocco
Piston Honda
 
Undead Rogue
 
Stormrage (EU)
Penalty to your team when you die?

If it was an arena or a purely premade team battleground, then yes, a penalty to your team when you die would be acceptable.

I mostly PVP with my ex main rogue when I'm in the mood to PVP and playing a rogue in a pug BG is an almost sure fire high death to kill ratio, if your doing your job properly and killing that healer who's keeping the warrior up even if that means you die soon afterwards. Now dying is going to be a penalty to your team?

It's a bizarre change, all the suggestions that have had merit on how to improve AV and they come up with this? It almost feels like they've gone out of their way to do something different, even if it makes no sense. I really have to question their understanding of their own battlegrounds.

The other changes are fine.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/04/07, 11:42 PM   #183
topojijo
Devout follower in the Holy Church of Beast Lore
 
Tauren Hunter
 
Mal'Ganis
The reinforcement system is no different than a game like battlefield. You die you lose a ticket. This will allow teams to win or lose without even killing the general.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/04/07, 11:59 PM   #184
Lookit
Piston Honda
 
Lookit's Avatar
 
Human Paladin
 
Skywall
Originally Posted by Cirocco View Post
Penalty to your team when you die?

If it was an arena or a purely premade team battleground, then yes, a penalty to your team when you die would be acceptable.

I mostly PVP with my ex main rogue when I'm in the mood to PVP and playing a rogue in a pug BG is an almost sure fire high death to kill ratio, if your doing your job properly and killing that healer who's keeping the warrior up even if that means you die soon afterwards. Now dying is going to be a penalty to your team?

It's a bizarre change, all the suggestions that have had merit on how to improve AV and they come up with this? It almost feels like they've gone out of their way to do something different, even if it makes no sense. I really have to question their understanding of their own battlegrounds.

The other changes are fine.
Perhaps "penalty to your team when you die" was a poor way of phrasing it. "Getting closer to victory for killing the other team's players" is more the idea behind the change. They simply score it in a way that you lose points everytime the opposing team kills one of your team mates.

Personally, I quite like the idea of each "life" in a BG not being almost entirely disposable. Currently, the main penalty for dying in a BG is simply not getting the HK you would have had you killed whoever killed you. (Dying while carrying the flag, etc, notwithstanding.)

I think the changes are excellent, and I look forward to trying the revamped AV. Currently, most games are simply a rush past the opposing team to zerg down the General. Now, the balance between offense and defense can be weighed with a much keener eye for strategy. Turtling could easily win the game now.

I'm excited.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 12:12 AM   #185
Grogzor
Huntard Extraordinaire
 
Grogzor's Avatar
 
Orc Hunter
 
Draenor
What do they mean by reinforcements and what will losing them mean?

Are they a limited number of rezzes your side gets?

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 12:16 AM   #186
topojijo
Devout follower in the Holy Church of Beast Lore
 
Tauren Hunter
 
Mal'Ganis
Reinforcements means the number of rezzes you get. So lets take some made up numbers. Lets say you have 1500 reinforcements that means your entire team can die up to 1500 times.

So losing reinforcements means that you have less times you can die and come back. So losing Belinda or Galv now is a big loss, along with the towers.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 12:18 AM   #187
Lookit
Piston Honda
 
Lookit's Avatar
 
Human Paladin
 
Skywall
Originally Posted by Grogzor View Post
What do they mean by reinforcements and what will losing them mean?

Are they a limited number of rezzes your side gets?

Neth wasn't particularly specific, but it would seem that each side starts out with a set number of "Reinforcements". Let's say it's 1000.

Each time the other team kills one of your players, you lose 1.

Each time the other team destroys a tower, you lose a significant amount (say 100 for the sake of example).

If the other team kills your captain, you lose a significant amount (say 100)

If the other team kills your General, your "Reinforcements" are reduced to zero and you automatically lose.

As you can see, killing the general is still an instant win, but it is no longer the only way to win. If you turtle up and the other team continues to throw themselves at you, you could very well rack up enough HK's to win the game without capping a single tower or GY.

I'm interested to see how this plays out. I'm glad they're bringing back the focus to player versus player combat in AV.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 12:18 AM   #188
Dinadass
Piston Honda
 
Dinadass's Avatar
 
Undead Warlock
 
Icecrown
No, reinforcements are essentially the same as the resources you get in AB/EotS, but backwards. So each side will start with a little number of X reinforcements at the top of the screen, and as NPCs on your side are killed, or towers are destroyed, or players are killed, your reinforcement number goes down accordingly. First team to 0 loses.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 12:24 AM   #189
Grogzor
Huntard Extraordinaire
 
Grogzor's Avatar
 
Orc Hunter
 
Draenor
Ah, either way I understand. For a second there I thought it might be tied to NPCs that help you or something.

If they really want to make AV have more strategery ;-) they should make it so you can also increase your reinforcements by doing stuff like running supplies from the mine to your base and such. That would give it a larger paradigm that the teams would have to decide how many they would devote to it.

Before, it took just too long and that is why nobody did them...that and you could easily skip those NPCs.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 1:08 AM   #190
Shade
Von Kaiser
 
Draenei Shaman
 
<JAE>
Boulderfist
Originally Posted by syeren View Post
Although this change is rather awesome, I'm going to REALLY love this as Alliance... Oh wait, another BG to be slaughtered in due to my incompetent 'team-mates' running around being idiots/themselves -_-

I really would love to play this as Horde though :P
Haha, is this still true, given that the Horde is overrun by blood elves nowadays? I remember when I used to play an orc shaman on Horde pre-TBC, we almost never lost an AB. But I've heard that since TBC, 70% of new characters created on the Horde side are blood elves.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 1:15 AM   #191
Opioid
Don Flamenco
 
Blood Elf Warlock
 
Kil'Jaeden
Originally Posted by syeren View Post
Although this change is rather awesome, I'm going to REALLY love this as Alliance... Oh wait, another BG to be slaughtered in due to my incompetent 'team-mates' running around being idiots/themselves -_-

I really would love to play this as Horde though :P
I've said it before and I'll say it again:

ANY FACTION VS. ANY FACTION BATTLEGROUNDS

I'd say, Look Blizzard, you solved abysmal queues depending on faction and talent/racial disparity in the Arena by allowing whatever pops the queue to be pitted against eachother. If you really wanna stop treating battlegrounds like the red-headed stepchild, please implement the wonderful and obvious solution you have *ALREADY INVENTED* and works well.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 1:17 AM   #192
Opioid
Don Flamenco
 
Blood Elf Warlock
 
Kil'Jaeden
Originally Posted by Shade View Post
Haha, is this still true, given that the Horde is overrun by blood elves nowadays? I remember when I used to play an orc shaman on Horde pre-TBC, we almost never lost an AB. But I've heard that since TBC, 70% of new characters created on the Horde side are blood elves.
What's wrong with blood elves? A blood elf player has already made a better choice than anyone that rolled troll (exaggerating but damn near true)

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 1:30 AM   #193
syeren
Don Flamenco
 
syeren's Avatar
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Stormscale (EU)
Originally Posted by Opioid View Post
I've said it before and I'll say it again:

ANY FACTION VS. ANY FACTION BATTLEGROUNDS

I'd say, Look Blizzard, you solved abysmal queues depending on faction and talent/racial disparity in the Arena by allowing whatever pops the queue to be pitted against eachother. If you really wanna stop treating battlegrounds like the red-headed stepchild, please implement the wonderful and obvious solution you have *ALREADY INVENTED* and works well.
What the hell are you going on about? I don't care about who I am facing, I know that when I played Horde I would win 90% of PUG BGs, and as Alliance I currently lose 90% of them in my battlegroup. I have no real complaints in the system any more, I did the whole Rank 14 bullshit for 4 months. The only reason I commented is that this will now make the BG a waste on my battlegroup as Alliance, but should overall be an improvement for everyone ;p

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 1:55 AM   #194
Opioid
Don Flamenco
 
Blood Elf Warlock
 
Kil'Jaeden
Originally Posted by syeren View Post
What the hell are you going on about? I don't care about who I am facing, I know that when I played Horde I would win 90% of PUG BGs, and as Alliance I currently lose 90% of them in my battlegroup. I have no real complaints in the system any more, I did the whole Rank 14 bullshit for 4 months. The only reason I commented is that this will now make the BG a waste on my battlegroup as Alliance, but should overall be an improvement for everyone ;p
Right, but your experiences aren't unique. They do describe many people's experiences in the game. If Alliance sometimes faced Alliance though, or Horde faced Horde, it would better match the skill and generally be more fun. If anything it would mix things up on servers or battlegroups where the orthodoxy is very much Alliance are bad/Horde are somewhat better.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 2:00 AM   #195
Moon
Von Kaiser
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Burning Legion
Considering AB and EotS have 2000 resources as their goal, I would assume AV under the new changes would have each team start out at 2000 reinforcements. Granted we haven't been able to test the new AV out, but at first glance it seems like we will see a lot of stalemates at IB tower/SH Bunker or Galv/Balinda. I think Van and Drek might be left alone for awhile. However, I remember Blizzard posting that they wanted to re-implement group queuing for AV. With these new changes and 40man premades I can see some epic battles that would be quite fun.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 2:11 AM   #196
MeCh
Fail is the mindkiller
 
MeCh's Avatar
 
Oppression
Gnome Death Knight
 
No WoW Account
The point system is just a timer so games won't last forever, its highly doubtful that people will die 2000 times before the usual game is over.

Hong Kong Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 3:49 AM   #197
Lookit
Piston Honda
 
Lookit's Avatar
 
Human Paladin
 
Skywall
Originally Posted by MeCh View Post
The point system is just a timer so games won't last forever, its highly doubtful that people will die 2000 times before the usual game is over.

We don't know what the starting Reinforcement amount will be, nor how many reinforcements are lost per tower, captain, etc.

If the starting amount is 500 and towers/captains are worth 50 each, then the team that rushes headlong into a well-defended choke point will lose by attrition. I somewhat doubt it will be as high as 2,000, unless capping towers/NPC's is worth a very large amount of points (say, enough to add up to 1500 without killing the General, meaning it would take 500 HK's to win the game without killing the General and with capping all points, killing the captains, etc.)

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 5:31 AM   #198
 Zak
Nuke it from orbit.
 
Zak's Avatar
 
Zak
Tauren Warrior
 
No WoW Account (EU)
If you're going to be penalised for dying, am I wrong to think they need to fix the geography around Stormpike and the Bridge of Death, otherwise Horde are getting shafted?

Scotland Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 5:44 AM   #199
Keline
King Hippo
 
Keline's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Death Knight
 
Mazrigos (EU)
They are removing the swarm of elite NPCs in the base so it should be easier to break through. Also, you don't have to take the bridge. I imagine you'll see a lot of horde also turtling up and killing alliance all day.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/05/07, 5:46 AM   #200
kadgar
Von Kaiser
 
Gnome Mage
 
Alleria (EU)
Originally Posted by Lookit View Post
Massive changes coming to AV in 2.3:

WoW Forums -> Alterac Valley Changes for Patch 2.3

Being able to win without killing the General.

Penalty to your entire team when you die.

Pulling the General will guarantee all Warmasters are pulled.

Destroying an enemy tower removes one of their Warmasters but does not add one to your side.

The "Reinforcement count" Neth mentions seems to be almost a backwards "Victory Point" counter as in EotS. Say you start at 2000 "Reinforcement count" - each HK the enemy gets reduce your number by 1. Losing Captains and towers reduces it by a significant amount. Losing your General reduces it completely, resulting in a loss.

Fascinating....
I think there are some bad changes there.
You shouldn't die anymore, so
-Healing gets more important wich is an advantage for horde, because most horde paladins are healers where alliance shamans are mostly not healers.
-Mana regeneration gets much more important, you cann't burn your mana and kamikaze (AE'ing into enemys) anymore.
-Destructive players have an easier job loosing the game because of the WM pull changes and the can lower the "Reinforcement count" running directly into horde again and again.
-When one of the factions count gets critical they will stop attacking and just deffing. When both teams have a low count the match can stuck with both teams deffing and not want to risk kills.

When you loose counts when you loose a graveyard or tower, you also should get additional counts for (sucessfully) capturing GYs and towers.

I'd suggest to make the starting area for the teams randomly, so that horde has a 50% chance to start in the alliance base, this would stop the complaints about unfair layouts and make the matches more variativ.

Additionally they should allow Horde<->Horde and Alliance<->Alliance matches like in Arena.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Player vs. Player

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raid target debuff tracking (a.k.a. "The pDebuffList Thread") Praetorian User Interface and AddOns 137 10/08/07 3:41 PM
World Breaker Mace proc "issues" ? beetlejuice The Dung Heap 3 06/21/07 8:37 AM
Armory not showing all arena teams? Could this affect calculations of "top 0.5%" lordofzedance Player vs. Player 28 05/21/07 11:29 AM
"Crits can Miss" vs. "Three Outcomes" Lhivera Class Mechanics 37 05/03/07 6:15 PM