For the reasons Gulaja mentioned, any sort of assassination type of match wouldn't work very well due to classes like Paladins, or prot Warriors and such.

Although, PvPing in areas like Stockades or VC would be fun, you'd have to tweak the maps a bit to open them up so you don't have the choke zones.

I think the BGs in general might have better response if they had limited/rotational uptime. You have people that are going for honor, people going for marks, and people just going to have fun. A lot of the time, people queue for 3 at once, get in one, and end up leaving for another before its over. If the uptime on each battleground was limited, the user would have less choices at once, still need and benefit from all the content, and I think it would help the poluarity of each individual BG as the # of choices people have is cut down. I know I can barely ever find a WSG game that's worth playing in, either they end up completely imbalanced numbers, or one team leaves before its over. Especially on my battlegroup where I have to wait 30+ minutes just to get into a game, it really sucks to see the "battleground closing, not enough players" before the gates even open.

Something like:

Week 1: Eye of the Storm and Warsong Gulch available, EoTS Weekend
Week 2: Warsong Gulch and Alterac Valley available, WSG Weekend
Week 3: AV and AB available, AV Weekend
Week 4: AB and EoTS available, AB Weekend

New battlegrounds could also be placed indefinately on the same model without spreading the BG participating playerbase too thin. I think it would also promote their new methods for team matching, as limiting the time played in each will probably increase the demand for teams.

They could even run like a month long test on one of the smaller more problematic battlegroups before making it the complete standard.

I personally would like to see a battleground where the objective is just to kill the other team. Basically arenas except you get honor for it, people actually queue and all the other battleground rules apply. Something like blade's edge with bridges, ramps, etc.. but not the annoying pillar jumps and pillars you can kite people around.

So, something which completely strips players from surviving right? Just have a big open field where nobody can run out of LOS. While we're at it, let's add an underwater arena map.

Av wouldn't be so bad if you had what is refered to as supply lines type play.

meaning that you can't take the base/place at the end just to get a spawn point near the boss skipping 5-10 places (as it is now).

You would have to take the base in front of the one you are trying to take. Totally remove guards and bosses in the place, make it completely player controlled GY's / Buildings. Give buildings emplacement type things that give the defenders a slight edge which needs a co-ordinated attack to overrun a defence point. Lessen the amount of Graveyards and shorten the distance to run.

This will enforce a battlefront and force people to fight each other to gain control, get rid of stupid choke points (horde twin towers and Alliance bridge style in AV) and give alternate routes to attack and weaken.

I think they need a more variety of BG's, not just in locations but sizes of the teams.

I personally would like to see flying mounts implemented in a BG, though obviously without the ridiculous invulnerabilities they grant currently. Polymorphing people off their mounts so they fall to their death and hibernating stormcrow druids would be gold.

A dota style map would be sex for this. Possibly allow people to fly over the trees to other paths, but implement a hp drain for every second you're airborne (it's windy... ACID wind!) so there's a tradeoff for taking the shortcut.

Would need to have mounts all the same speed or people without epics would cry bloody murder.

There's plenty of oddball FPS scenarios that would be very dynamic if they make a system with more than two teams. As an example - king of the hill and football. King of the hill is when an area is marked as a 'hill' and a player from a given team standing in it gets points per second. You could have the 'hill' move and conflict resolution upto your imagination. Football is similar but now there's a flag one of the people carries, you get points per second for holding the flag. These wouldn't be nearly as good with 2 teams only.

I'm not fond of promoting "world pvp" too heavily. Honestly, I just want to be able to go out and farm shit when I need to. I'm a pvp oriented player but I'd rather not be dealing with people on epic flyers zooming in every 5mins to fuck with me while I'm trying to grind up some Primals or whatever. I'd personally like to see a 1v1 skirmish-only arena to play in. Scouting for duels outside capitals is pretty limited. Would give me everything I want from world pvp. To me it's about smacking people up mano a mano rather than in the damn zerg in BGs.

They already did that when we were dealing with 60/100% mounts, and we seem to have survived. I don't see why this would be any different.
(I say this as someone without a 240% mount)

Yeah, it might cause a lot of issues. Not sure. It's just very very frustrating that I signed up for a PvP server, and that just means there's more Battlegrounds going on. I want people fighting over the top farming spots(even more than they are at elemental plateau atm, where there's just random gankings).