Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Urban Rivals
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > Player vs. Player
Elitist Jerks Login

gamerDNA Login

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
We're testing some new features on the site regarding OpenID registration and coordination with gamerDNA. If you experience any issues with registering an account, please take the time to fill out a report and send it to this e-mail address. We would appreciate any assistance you could provide in making sure everything is functioning as intended. Thanks!

If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old 05/21/07, 9:55 AM   #26
 Maestroquark
What would you have me do?
 
Maestroquark's Avatar
 
Orc Rogue
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Vazu View Post
I'm sticking to what I wrote above.

Teams shouldn't count toward the total for .5% unless they are 1500 rated or better, and meet a minimum quote of games played for the season. Blizzard would decide how many total games would be enough. But something like 100-150 seems fair.
The number of games requirement is one thing. But by only counting +1500, you're forgetting that 1500 is supposed to be "average". At that point, why not just make it the top .25%?
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 05/21/07, 10:28 AM   #27
Tehehe
Von Kaiser
 
Tehehe's Avatar
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Black Dragonflight
Originally Posted by sp00n View Post
Well, I just checked as well.
Doing so I noticed that *every single* server of my battlegroup has ~5000 teams listed on 3v3.
The armory caps at around 5000 teams, so there are certainly more. Also most of the time these teams have a ranking of ~1200, so they are not the bottom line so far.
I think you made a mistake somewhere in your observations. Your own server (Wrathbringer) only has something like 470 2v2 teams. Another server in your Battlegroup (Dun Morogh) has ~280 teams.

I'm not sure how you got your numbers, but what I did was go to the listing 2v2 listing for each server and then look at how many pages of teams there are. Each page shows 20 teams, so 20*(# of pages) is approximately how many teams are on the server.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 05/21/07, 11:06 AM   #28
sp00n
Bald Bull
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Wrathbringer (EU)
Originally Posted by Tehehe View Post
I think you made a mistake somewhere in your observations. Your own server (Wrathbringer) only has something like 470 2v2 teams. Another server in your Battlegroup (Dun Morogh) has ~280 teams.

I'm not sure how you got your numbers, but what I did was go to the listing 2v2 listing for each server and then look at how many pages of teams there are. Each page shows 20 teams, so 20*(# of pages) is approximately how many teams are on the server.
Damn, you're right. I was looking at their rank instead counting the pages and forgot that the rank displayed there is the overall rank for the battleground and not only for the server (3v3 btw).
Hm. Still the point stands how many games / ranked weeks / arena points you will need to be included in the final standings.

 
User is online.
Reply With Quote
Old 05/21/07, 11:29 AM   #29
Tehehe
Von Kaiser
 
Tehehe's Avatar
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Black Dragonflight
Originally Posted by sp00n View Post
Still the point stands how many games / ranked weeks / arena points you will need to be included in the final standings.
Honestly, I don't think they are going to be putting any limitations/requirements on the number of games played or rating. The EU CM that posted information stated that:

"The top 0.5% of the teams of each bracket will receive the Netherdrake epic flying mount, as well as the top Arena title. This means that the top 0.5% of the teams in the 2v2 bracket, the top 0.5% of the teams in the 3v3 bracket, and the top 0.5% of the teams in the 5v5 bracket will all receive the Netherdrake and the title. "

He very specifically says "0.5% of the teams" and does not put any stipulations on the term "team". I would guess that it it will in fact be the top 0.5% of all teams in each bracket.

I am not saying that I agree with it or believe it is the best way to distribute the Drakes, just what seems most likely to me.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > Player vs. Player

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raid target debuff tracking (a.k.a. "The pDebuffList Thread") Praetorian User Interface and AddOns 137 10/08/07 3:41 PM
Arena Team "Powering" - Unsportsmanlike or not? Riot Player vs. Player 117 06/12/07 8:17 AM
"Crits can Miss" vs. "Three Outcomes" Lhivera Class Mechanics 37 05/03/07 6:15 PM
Arena Rewards (was "Arena Season only 2 months") Zeboim Public Discussion 328 02/28/07 10:09 PM