Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion » Player vs. Player

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12/10/07, 5:10 AM   #1
Mearis
Mr. Sandman
 
Mearis's Avatar
 
Dwarf Priest
 
Defias Brotherhood (EU)
2 versus 2 and insane queues

I particularly enjoy smaller brackets for PvP - I love 3 vs 3 and 2 versus 2, and even though I just started PvP'ing as holy recently, it is a lot more enjoyable.

The problem is with the way Blizzard assigns servers/instance spots in the smaller brackets - 2 versus 2 is vastly more popular than 3 versus 3, and infinitely more popular than 5 versus 5. This is because the logistics of 2 vs 2 are much easier, and a lot more people enjoy playing that more casually. The problem is that unless you are willing to play at ungodly hours, you will usually have 8 or 9 minute queues waiting for an instance to free up - while for 3 vs 3 and 5 vs 5 you almost always have under 1 minute waiting times.

Could server resources be shifted around so people can play in the smaller brackets without waiting an eternity? Queues suck, they are by far the worst part of arena after the honor farming required for the resilience gear.

Last edited by Mearis : 12/13/07 at 10:35 AM.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 5:22 AM   #2
Kaber
King Hippo
 
Tauren Druid
 
Stormreaver
I hate the queues as well, but I see them as more of a balancing aspect for Arenas. 2v2 is hugely popular, but it also has the most gimicky teams and with the kind of rewards you can see, a lot of people would never bother with anything but 2v2 if you did not have to deal with queue times. This pushes more people into the 3v3 bracket that do not want to deal with queues. The ease of putting a 2v2 together is counteracted by the royal pain of 10 minute queues. Though I have to say, the only time I see 10-12 minute queues is on Monday during Prime Time when everyone is trying to get their games in at the last minute. Generally I see ~5 minute queues Tues-Sat.

I think it would be more bearable if you could queue into a battle ground while you waited for your Arena queue to pop.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 5:34 AM   #3
Yes
Bald Bull
 
Yes's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Dragonmaw
There's nothing balancing about not making enough servers to serve everyone quickly. It's the same reasoning that would say that on a 1-10 ration server in the olde times the more populous faction should wait an hour to do bgs.


Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 5:47 AM   #4
Cull
Von Kaiser
 
Cull's Avatar
 
Orc Shaman
 
Norgannon
I would not mind the 2v2 and sometimes 3v3 queue times if they were created because of unbalanced population but Blizzard has stated that it is because of the cap they place on the number of games that can be played at one time. Which is pretty ludicrous considering that the amount of money they are taking in and can't even afford to support their players with proper servers for arenas. Waiting 10 minutes to play a sometimes less than a minute match is unreal.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 6:03 AM   #5
Mearis
Mr. Sandman
 
Mearis's Avatar
 
Dwarf Priest
 
Defias Brotherhood (EU)
2 vs 2 and 3 vs 3 do have balance issues, but that's not what I am complaining about. They are by far the favorite brackets, and capping the number of matches that can take place is downright sadistic, I doubt their intention is to push people into bigger brackets.

I think they just drastically underestimated how popular arenas would end up being, and 2 versus 2 is by far the most resource intensive/player format there is. They have an insane profit margin, just buy more servers, having to wait 8 minutes between matches is just a killjoy.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 9:57 AM   #6
Keline
King Hippo
 
Keline's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Death Knight
 
Mazrigos (EU)
Blutdurst 2on2 during prime is up to 20 minutes.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 10:08 AM   #7
Suesse
Don Flamenco
 
Suesse's Avatar
 
Human Death Knight
 
Llane
I believe they made some official statement recently about 2v2 queue length. They said that they knew about it and had no plans to fix it.

I've had some luck playing before work in the morning (<1 minute queues); however, most partners are not willing to do this. Also, I'm not really playing my best at this time in the morning.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 10:14 AM   #8
Angeron
Don Flamenco
 
Angeron's Avatar
 
Dwarf Warrior
 
Lightninghoof
Originally Posted by Suesse View Post
I believe they made some official statement recently about 2v2 queue length. They said that they knew about it and had no plans to fix it.

I've had some luck playing before work in the morning (<1 minute queues); however, most partners are not willing to do this. Also, I'm not really playing my best at this time in the morning.
I've resorted to doing this as well (EARLY EARLY queues) and it's really just a totally punishing requirement. If Blizzard really has no intention to *fix* 2v2 queues (a 5 minute queue time at eleven AM on a weekday is just absurd, let alone the 17-30 minute queues during prime time weekends and monday nights), the least they could do is allow people to queue for BGs simultaneously.

Though I can hide my cold gaze, and you can shake my hand and feel flesh gripping yours, and maybe you can even sense our lifestyles are probably comparable; I simply am not there.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 10:18 AM   #9
Mearis
Mr. Sandman
 
Mearis's Avatar
 
Dwarf Priest
 
Defias Brotherhood (EU)
Did they expand on why they aren't interested in fixing it?

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 10:30 AM   #10
Suesse
Don Flamenco
 
Suesse's Avatar
 
Human Death Knight
 
Llane
Originally Posted by Mearis View Post
Did they expand on why they aren't interested in fixing it?
I think they even suggested playing off-hours. I think it's a matter of "hey we'd love to fix this, but someone in management has determined that it's not worth investing our time at this time."

WoW BlueTracker: I'd love a response regarding 2v2 queues

Last edited by Suesse : 12/10/07 at 10:32 AM. Reason: Link

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 11:40 AM   #11
Avair
The Howard Roark of Shipwrights
 
Avair's Avatar
 
Avair
Human Rogue
 
No WoW Account
This is purely a capacity issue as far as I can tell. Basically, they have more demand for instance servers than servers to fill them. I suppose it's good problem to have, since it means you have a popular feature on your hands. Arena instances would seem to be a really easy problem to scale up. You need more instances? Add more instance servers. Each instance server should be almost completely standalone. They should be 'share nothing' architecture (as in the communication between 10 instance servers is no different than 20 instance servers), which is the most scalable kind of enterprise system.

Unless there is some weird poorly designed architecture which prevents just plugging in more servers, I would guess they think they might add too much capacity for what might be a temporary problem. I.e. arena are popular now, but they don't want to over buy. I don't really buy that though, since I was having queue problems last season too. Monday night 2v2's have been impossible for months.

It's kinda excusable in my mind that one of the most popular feature's in wow is mostly inaccesable during prime time.

United States Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 11:52 AM   #12
Mearis
Mr. Sandman
 
Mearis's Avatar
 
Dwarf Priest
 
Defias Brotherhood (EU)
Yeah, I understand why there are long waiting times, I just don't understand the justification for it. It is by far the most popular arena setting, and what most people want to play, yet we want to push people to do something else?

That makes no sense to me at all.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 11:56 AM   #13
Vectivus
foreign contaminant
 
Vectivus's Avatar
 
Tauren Death Knight
 
Mal'Ganis
Part of it is a user-density issue - everyone transfers to the 'big' battlegroups to face the 'real' competition.

In Retaliation, I've never - literally, never - seen a queue of more than 2 minutes.

Originally Posted by Theras View Post
Frankly I don't know how you non-Nordic people can breed in good conscience.

Canada Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 12:02 PM   #14
Tower
King Hippo
 
Undead Rogue
 
Blackhand
Well, Rampage is an "old" and "popular" cluster, I don't think anyone is transferring to the battlegroup to PvP though. And 2v2 queue times are 8m+, anything over 4-5m in my opinion is ridiculous and should be fixed. It's bad business to have a part of the game become so popular but you continually to ignore the growing need to support that popularity.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12/10/07, 12:05 PM   #15
• Snowy
Mitt Romney?
 
Snowy's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Priest
 
Mal'Ganis
On Stormstrike, our 2v2 queue's during prime time can easily shoot over 10 minutes, even 15. Even at times like 4 pm, they're usually at least 5 minutes or so. As noted, Blizzard actually posted suggesting that you queue for 3v3 or 5v5 instead, or queue at off-peak times, as they had no intentions on alleviating this problem.

It's not quite as simple as shifting resources from 5's to 2's -- 2's are VASTLY more popular. Just look at the number of teams in 2v2 compared to 5v5. Now consider how easy it is to play those 2v2 teams. Your teammate is on -- great, queue up. It's not like 5v5 where your teams probably schedule their times in advance and maybe play once or twice a week.

United States Offline
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion » Player vs. Player

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
insane procrates since patch 1.9? Vesperia Public Discussion 18 02/04/06 3:58 PM