 |
|
Spell Hit
|
[top]Spell Hit Rating
Spell Hit Rating is one of the most important stats to understand as a dps caster, because it can potentially do so much, or so little, for your overall dps. Spell hit rating is typically easy to acquire, so stacking the right amount of spell hit can drastically improve your dps against raid bosses. Keep in mind, though, spell hit is a weighted stat just like any other, and while powerful, there is no special significance to reaching your maximum effective spell hit. In some rare cases it can be optimal to ignore spell hit in favor of other stats.
[top]Rating Conversion
For all casters, 12.6 spell hit rating is equivalent to 1% increased chance to hit at level 70.
[top]Hit Capping
When you reach the maximum amount of spell hit that is effective for your class/spec, you are referred to as capped. All spells cap their chance to hit at 99%, meaning every offensive spell cast has an unavoidable 1% chance to resist. For a target 3 levels above your character (all raid bosses), spells have a native 83% chance to hit. That means the most effect a spell caster can ever get from spell hit rating is 16% (202 rating).
All talents that are worded "reduces your target's chance to resist by" or "increase your chance to hit with spells by" are effectively the same as spell hit gear, and should be treated as such regarding the spells they affect. Thus you can reduce the amount of hit rating needed to cap through talents. See Spell Hit Rating and Talent Specs for more information on particular class talent specs and their respective hit caps.
The level of a mob relative to your character directly impacts your native chance to hit. Assuming a level 70 caster, base hit chance is as follows:
70: 96%
71: 95%
72: 94%
73: 83%
All skull level bosses are level 73. However, many fights have adds that are level 72 or below. Because there is a steep drop off in hit cap against anything less than 73, it may be optimal to swap gear for stats other than hit rating for encounters with particularly unfriendly adds.
[top]Group Buffs
Depending on the composition of your raid, you may receive group buffs which lower the effective hit rating needed on your gear. Elemental Shaman's Totem of Wrath, which requires 41 points in elemental talents to use, increases spell hit chance by 3%. Draenei Mages, Priests, and Shaman have a group aura that increases spell hit chance by 1%.
[top]Resists and Spell Penetration
Spell Penetration and Spell Hit Rating serve entirely separate functions. What's important to note is that spell penetration is entirely useless for the vast majority of pve encounters. It's primary purpose is as a pvp stat. For more information see Spell Penetration.
|
Contributors:
|
Created by Vontre, 08/22/07 at 12:09 AM
Last edited by Vontre, 08/27/07 at 3:39 PM
24 Comments
, 11223 Views
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 9:54 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Don Lactose
Tauren Hunter
Talnivarr (EU)
|
- For a level 73 target (most raid bosses)
- Almost all skull level bosses are level 73.
What do you mean by this?
I was under the impression that every skull mob (i.e. boss) was considered to be 3 levels above you for calculating hit, crit, miss, etc.
|
SNAKEBALL™
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 9:57 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
"The Enforcer"
|
Yeah, that is my understanding as well.
|
Gurgthock: the time taken to implement the 10 hugs achievement could have been used to make a new 5-man
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 11:48 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
These Arms Are Snakes
|
Just making sure.
|
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 1:59 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Chief Passenger
Gnome Rogue
Earthen Ring (EU)
|
I thought Draenei aura did affect the player, it just didn't show as a buff?
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 3:35 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
And It's Delicious
|
Originally Posted by songster
I thought Draenei aura did affect the player, it just didn't show as a buff?
|
This was my understanding as well. Testing is probably needed.
|
http://mmorchive.net
The WoW forums, explained:
|
Originally Posted by Vontre
Oh, nah, I just type things for the sake of typing things. ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 4:58 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
These Arms Are Snakes
|
I didn't see the buff, but I really have no idea. 
|
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 5:00 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
"The Enforcer"
|
It probably isn't a displayed buff, just like the 10% HP bonus Taurens get isn't displayed.
|
Gurgthock: the time taken to implement the 10 hugs achievement could have been used to make a new 5-man
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 5:26 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Don Lactose
Tauren Hunter
Talnivarr (EU)
|
Tsk, tsk. Tauren = +5% Health.
I am of the same belief as songster and Kalman, though.
|
SNAKEBALL™
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 5:50 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
"The Enforcer"
|
Gawd you are picky sometimes :P
The Tauren racial hp bonus then!
|
Gurgthock: the time taken to implement the 10 hugs achievement could have been used to make a new 5-man
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 6:07 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
These Arms Are Snakes
|
Yar I changed it.
How is my formatting/layout/general idea? Grammar?
|
|
|
|
|
08/22/07, 6:42 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Don Lactose
Tauren Hunter
Talnivarr (EU)
|
There's a couple of capitalization things I think we should agree on for the various guides. Personally, I capitalize most stuff as I see it in-game - 'Chance to Crit', 'Level 70', 'Mage', 'DPS'. I know that some of this might seem a bit strange to some, so I'm not sure what the best solution would be.
Other than that, I don't want to be the person who signs off grammar (English isn't my first language, after all), but it seems fine to me.
When you reach the maximum amount of spell hit that is effective for your class/spec, you are referred to as capped.
'Effective' sounds a bit strange to my ears, without a definition. If, for example, after reaching 99% Hit, you now needed 5x more Spell Hit Rating per 1% Spell Hit, I wouldn't say that it was very effective, but it would still have an effect.
Something like ...that is effective (i.e. adding more Spell Hit has no effect)...?
This might be just lack of sleep talking, though.
|
SNAKEBALL™
|
|
|
|
08/26/07, 2:23 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Paid $25 To Raid
Draenei Shaman
Burning Blade
|
I like how it's phrased now, actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/27/07, 9:14 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
The Google Map Team can no longer help you
Tauren Shaman
Skullcrusher
|
I was reading this today and having no clue about spell hit stuff, the following occurred to me as I read it:
You have the statement about what the standard resist rate is for a raid boss, but you phrase it as a "level 73 mob". I thought it might be better if you just said "raid boss, which are always 3 levels above the player" - since that will hold true at lvl 60, 80, etc etc.
That in turn made me wonder what the inherent resist rates were for mobs that are 1 and 2 levels above the player, such as typical raid zone trash, or even mobs that you might be grinding while solo playing.
|
|
Why all thinks that WF is better than rock?
|
~Rocks, coming to a shaman near you in the next expansion~
Originally Posted by Bluur
Oh, and btw, vulajin, I don't know why we gave you those fucking pants and the muramasa - maybe if your dps was anywhere near your precious spreadsheets you'd actually beat my DPS once in a while.
|
|
|
|
|
08/27/07, 11:16 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Bald Bull
|
this pretty much covers it, the table is at least worth copying
Spell hit rating - WoWWiki, the Warcraft wiki
|
<superblotto> Last I heard the Arcane Believers were going to burn the Infidel normal people at the stake but refused to use fire. Things went down hill from there
<arioch> arcane blast the firewood
<Blackpatch> they tried
<Blackpatch> but went OOM
Manly <Jet Silk Tires> / Lich King
|
|
|
|
09/13/07, 10:07 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
HP/MP restored, but you're still hungry
|
For completeness, it decays by 11% per level after that.
Also, are we bothering to disclaim information that's not accurate for PvP?
|
Carrot Cake Soup is like the taste of watching girls make out.
|
|
|
|
09/13/07, 10:27 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Lifebloom Whore
Night Elf Druid
Laughing Skull
|
|
Spell Penetration and Spell Hit Rating serve entirely separate functions.
|
How do they differ in PvP? If enemy resistance increases the 4% chance to miss a level 70 opponent, does hit reduce that chance? Or is resistance-based miss computed separately, and only affected by penetration?
|
|
|
|
|
|
09/17/07, 1:31 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
These Arms Are Snakes
|
Penetration is computer first and only affects the amount of "active" magic resistance your target has (buffs, gear, etc).
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/07, 7:20 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Until your thumbs break
Blood Elf Warlock
Mal'Ganis
|
Originally Posted by songster
I thought Draenei aura did affect the player, it just didn't show as a buff?
|
I can confirm that it helps the player, but is listed nowhere on the character sheet, for melee hit at least (on my draenei warrior), and my Draenei friend has results to say the same on his shadow priest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/07/08, 9:07 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
Dwarf Priest
Khaz'goroth (EU)
|
Feedback: The link in talents to "Spell Hit Rating and Talent Specs" returns a page not available to me. If this is intented please delete this post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/07/08, 10:37 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Bald Bull
Blood Elf Paladin
Mal'Ganis
|
That's an article which hasn't been written yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/21/08, 7:40 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Spell hit and binary spells is missing.
When you cast binary spells at a target which has resistances to your spell's school, your spell hit chance is actually lower than 83%. E.g. when you cast Frostbolts at Rage Winterchill, your spell hit chance will be 83% - ( (Winterchills frost resistance - CoE - casters spell penetration) translated in spell "miss" chance, let's say 20%) + casters spell hit items, buffs, talents.
So at Winterchill a Frostmage can easily equipp 30% spell hit and still be under the cap. In other words: When you cast binary spells against a resistant mob, you can increase your dmg with spell penetration, spell hit or a combination of both.
The 2nd. point I'm not sure if worth adding:
Spell hit chance is scaling non linear: When you have 10% spell hit chance at your target (e.g. lvl60 player against lvl70 mob, or really high binary resistance) and you equipp 1 extra % spell hit, this will increase your dps by 10%. The effect is not that extreme at 83% but still there. Also spell hit indirectly increases your crit chance because of the 2 roll system.
Also a source: WoW Forums -> +Spell Hit Chance - 10/5/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/30/08, 10:35 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
|
Forgive me if I missed this, but I was reading on the WoW Mage forums, that if your a frost mage and you take Elemental precision, that your spell hit rating didn't have to be the 164 cap, and it could be lower than that. I ask, cause I have a 174 Spell hit, and while being mainly in the Arcane Tree, i still put the remainders into the Frost Tree with particular attention payed to getting Elemental Precision.
I was always under the impression that 164 spell hit was required, period. untill I hear otherwise I will continue to believe that, and will advise the mages in my guild to keep getting spell hit.
thank you for your time, and I appologize if my spelling is bad - im a horrible typist, and bandaged fingers doesn't help either 
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/30/08, 9:50 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
|
Remember that Elemental Precision only applies the +3% hit to fire and frost spells, so it does nothing for your Polymorph, Arcane Blast, Arcane Missiles, Spellsteal etc. There's a separate talent giving a +hit bonus to Arcane spells.
I think what you're referring to is a bug with Elemental Precision and Frostbolt. It was (and possibly still is) the case that the Elemental Precision bonus was being incorrectly applied twice to Frostbolt, and Frostbolt only. So you would only need +10% spell hit to reach the cap with Frostbolt. However, I don't know if this bug is still current (apparently it was slated to be fixed in 2.4).
|
|
|
|
|
|
05/01/08, 11:35 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
|
ahhh cool - im not sure if it is or not, was just something I read - and as CL for my guilds raiding mages, I just wanted to be sure I was passing correct (or as correct as possible) information to help us progress.
ty for the info 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|