Kahorie's DK simulator 2.0 Beta - Including Cataclysm. - Page 61

Relai · 04/14/10, 4:29 PM

I've looked through this thread and haven't found anything about it. I've been running the simulator using a frost spec. But razorice doesn't seem to be accounted for. Frost Strike and Howling Blast seem to be staying at the same average damage.

I ran two simulations. The first with Fallen crusader in the MH and Razorice in OH. The second was with Fallen Crusader in MH and nothing in OH. I'm using this spec 0/53/18.

The damage for both FS and HB is the same in both. Neither of the two abilities seems to increase by 10% with Razorice on, which I assumed that they would.

Larisroth · 04/14/10, 7:03 PM

Yeah it looks like I broke razor-ice at some point. I now get RI > CG > CG (with CGDiseases) for my DW Frost test data. For some reason the CGDisease optimisation doesn't work very well with Frost though. It's pretty close however (within 50 dps).

Afabar · 04/15/10, 9:01 AM

1.2.1.5 Release notes
* Bug fixes: Razorice, 4PT9, Bloodboil, KM + Rime
* Added Rune, GCD usage to the report.

Kahorie's DK Simulator 1.2.1.5

Vajrus · 04/15/10, 1:29 PM

Is it just me or is the 1.2.1.5 version having some processing improvements ? I get the DPS calculaction done in 1sec, usually that took me ~30sec. Anyway its really nice

kc102 · 04/15/10, 1:44 PM

It defaults to one hour of testing. Change it to 100 hours for your old times.

Teohetimokan · 04/16/10, 12:04 PM

It's apears that macro BT/UA (after BS) doesn't work very well, (i think), cause when I don't take UA in my template, i do more DPS.

My seconde template is a 15-56-00 and I can't make rotation properly:
HB OB BS (BT/UA) BS dump - HB OB OB dump. My probleme is when i proc Rime, I can make one more OB. How can i make this work ?

kc102 · 04/16/10, 8:07 PM

You might be using an old version. I just tested out my Unholy and Frost builds with Bone shield/UA after BS/BB and instead of BS.

After BS/BB
Unholy: 11663
Frost: 12094

Instead of BS/BB
Unholy: 11662
Frost: 11508

As you can see, it's an almost nil change for Unholy, while huge for Frost. This is using a priority and the options in the first tab of the sim.

bobsmith6 · 04/16/10, 11:16 PM

so first time post long time reader, recently downloaded the sim. with DBW and DC it has me simmed 13967 (+- 1456)
i replaced DC with HWT and it sims me at 18456(+- 567) should i go for the war token if its that much of an increase or just ignore it im not sure feel free to comment

Teohetimokan · 04/17/10, 3:30 AM

frostmonger · 04/17/10, 11:15 AM

I keep getting this error message. Anyone know how to fix? Thanks

See the end of this message for details on invoking
just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.

************** Exception Text **************
System.UnauthorizedAccessException: Access to the path 'C:\Program Files\Kahorie's DK Simulator\Kahorie's DK Simulator 1.2.1.5\EPconfig.xml' is denied.
at System.IO.__Error.WinIOError(Int32 errorCode, String maybeFullPath)
at System.IO.FileStream.Init(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, Int32 rights, Boolean useRights, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES secAttrs, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy)
at System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share)
at System.Xml.XmlTextWriter..ctor(String filename, Encoding encoding)
at System.Xml.XmlDocument.Save(String filename)
at DKSIMVB.MainForm.SaveEPOptions()
at DKSIMVB.MainForm.LoadBeforeSim()
at DKSIMVB.MainForm.Button1Click(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnClick(EventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.Button.OnClick(EventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.Button.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mevent)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.ButtonBase.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.Button.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

************** Loaded Assemblies **************
mscorlib
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.3074 (QFE.050727-3000)
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll
----------------------------------------
Kahorie's DK Simulator
Assembly Version: 1.2.1.5
Win32 Version: 1.2.1.5
CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/Kahorie's%20DK%20Simulator/Kahorie's%20DK%20Simulator%201.2.1.5/Kahorie's%20DK%20Simulator.exe
----------------------------------------
Microsoft.VisualBasic
Assembly Version: 8.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 8.0.50727.3053 (netfxsp.050727-3000)
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic/8.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll
----------------------------------------
System
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.3053 (netfxsp.050727-3000)
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Windows.Forms
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.3053 (netfxsp.050727-3000)
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Drawing
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.3053 (netfxsp.050727-3000)
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Runtime.Remoting
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.3053 (netfxsp.050727-3000)
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Runtime.Remoting/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Runtime.Remoting.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Xml
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.3074 (QFE.050727-3000)
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll
----------------------------------------

************** JIT Debugging **************
To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this
application or computer (machine.config) must have the
jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.
The application must also be compiled with debugging
enabled.

For example:

<configuration>
<system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" />
</configuration>

When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception
will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computer
rather than be handled by this dialog box.

kc102 · 04/17/10, 2:38 PM

Teoh, are you simming with a rotation or a priority?

Bandee · 04/18/10, 4:21 AM

With the new 1.2.1.5 version of the simulator I've noticed a huge increase in the value of haste. I was getting EP values of <2 before, and now I'm sitting at 2.6. On the Unholy DPS thread there's a big discussion of the value of haste going on. All the previous versions didn't have such high values for haste, so my question is did you guys make any mistakes that would lead to such a large discrepancy, or did you fix a mistake from the previous incarnations and the current haste values are indeed accurate?

Teohetimokan · 04/18/10, 4:26 AM

Originally Posted by kc102

Teoh, are you simming with a rotation or a priority?

I use the default priority.

Lamperouqe · 04/18/10, 6:13 AM

Originally Posted by Bandee

With the new 1.2.1.5 version of the simulator I've noticed a huge increase in the value of haste. I was getting EP values of <2 before, and now I'm sitting at 2.6. On the Unholy DPS thread there's a big discussion of the value of haste going on. All the previous versions didn't have such high values for haste, so my question is did you guys make any mistakes that would lead to such a large discrepancy, or did you fix a mistake from the previous incarnations and the current haste values are indeed accurate?

I am not using 1.2.1.5 and am getting haste values of 2.78 in 0/17/54.
I read that the default simulated time in was changed to 1h, so check that you've changed it and that you're using a rotation while simming. Though rather than the new version being broken, it seems that your haste was undervalued in the last versions (even though nothing Unholy/haste related changed), so I suspect that your current values are actually correct.

I noticed you're playing 3/3 Reaping and 2/3 Subversion which might make your results differ slightly from people using the 0/17/54 spec.

Bandee · 04/18/10, 4:14 PM

Originally Posted by Lamperouqe

I am not using 1.2.1.5 and am getting haste values of 2.78 in 0/17/54.
I read that the default simulated time in was changed to 1h, so check that you've changed it and that you're using a rotation while simming. Though rather than the new version being broken, it seems that your haste was undervalued in the last versions (even though nothing Unholy/haste related changed), so I suspect that your current values are actually correct.

I noticed you're playing 3/3 Reaping and 2/3 Subversion which might make your results differ slightly from people using the 0/17/54 spec.

Oh, believe me I know how to use the sim. I also used Consider's gear, and the standard 0/17/54 spec for the sim. I don't check here often so my last version was actually 1.2.1.2, if that makes any difference. I noticed that there was a lot of talk on haste going on in the unholy thread, and the discussion coincided with when the newest version of the sim was released.