Yes, the goal is for all stats that roll with the diseases to be taken into account for both disease damage and things like 4T9. Currently, GoD rotations (and DRW) are using a pretty simple approach to maximum stats, which is to use all on-use effects (trinkets, UA, things like that) combined with whichever one proc results in the highest damage for the given ability. Unfortunately, this doesn't account for the rather frequent cases of multiple strong procs occurring at the same time (ie pretty much any proc plus FC plus Sigil of Virulence), which will result in a slight undervaluing in these circumstances. Note that the current GoD implementation is not rolling crit values for 4T9, which will result in crit being somewhat undervalued. Note that none of this impacts gargoyle calculations currently, as I'm putting that off until I can nail down some other issues with gargoyle; namely, in-game they seem to cast quite a bit fewer gargoyle strikes than they should; over their 30 second duration, I'm regularly getting just ten gargoyle strikes per usage with zero haste equipped, when I should be getting closer to 15. As such, I need to do more thorough testing to better account for this; it seems as though the gargoyle spends the first 5-6 seconds just flying up before it starts casting, but that doesn't fully account for the total ten seconds of cast time that seem to be disappearing.

In regards to filters, I actually know embarrassingly little about them; questions or issues with them can be competently answered in the main rawr thread (http://elitistjerks.com/f31/t21713-r...leased_10_6_a/).

Check your filters; there was a release that was (briefly) up that had most of them disabled, apparently. You can either enable relevant ones, or just enable the ALL filter.

Had same problem. You have to go to Filters -> Options -> Disable BoP Jewelcrafting (Uncheck it).
It seem checking ALL in filters does not influence these "Options" settings.

On another note. Where can I find discussions on the tankDK-module?

I believe that DC and IT use the spell GDC rather then the melee GCD. While both have a base of 1.5 seconds, haste will shorten the spell GCD. Therefore I have 2 questions:

1) Does Rawr take this into account when calculating the value of haste for us?

2) Can the Rotation Viewer function take this into account when calculating the duration of a rotation?

While I do not think we will ever have enough haste to get down to the 1 second spell GCD cap, I do think we can shorten a 10.5 second rotation down to a 10 second rotation...which will probably be a larger factor with the next tier of gear when we get a buff for having all our runes on cooldown.

At some point I was in the same situation as a previous poster where it was suggested by Rawr that Razorice/Razorice was a better enchant setup, which I realized must be wrong, and in fact it was due to the model thinking you could have 2 stacks of RI. That stopped, but now it is suggesting FC/FC. I know that dual FC will give you better uptime, though I am wondering if dual FC is being handled correctly by Rawr, since at a glance it seems to be giving an inordinate amount of dps gain for FC offhand. Any clarification on FC/FC modeling?

I actually just did a lot of testing around weapon enchants for the new simulator tool that I'm working on (see this post here for more details: DW Builds 3.2 -Revenge of the Offhand, the link to the simulator itself is: Team Robot WoW Simulator).

My simulator also does gear comparisons similar to rawr, but I use a different technique. Nevertheless, I'm sure that they have run into similar problems with weapon enchants:

If you average out the FC proc, you get nearly 100% up-time (if you don't do super-crazy statistics stuff). In practice though, the randomness will cause it to drop off here and there. Thus, when I do my DPS estimates, I get a very low estimate for putting a 2nd FC enchant on, because it doesn't increase the up-time, if at all. In the actual simulation, you get a little more of a boost than the estimate says.

Nevertheless, running with FC/FC doesn't do much for you. You're always better off with Razorice or Cinderglacier on the OH for any DW spec.

I actually ran a bunch of simulations with just razorice, dual razorice, just cinderglacier, and dual cinderglacier, for both frost DW and unholy DW specs. I use that cached data to estimate the value of weapon enchants, and with no contest, it came out to:

frost DW: FC/Razorice
unholy DW: FC/Cinderglacier

Rawr is handling all of the weapon enchant proc effects as stackable, which is clearly problematic, as it doesn't reflect the diminshed value of the second FC enchant or the greatly diminished value of a second razorice enchant. It's something I'd like to fix eventually, but since runeforges are practically a given for the DW specs, it's pretty low priority.

Was thinking if you were planning to introduce so it's possible to check specs against several targets?

I've seen it in other classes Rawr's, and i think it could be a nice addition, since we don't see many single target fights these days. And several targets benefits other stats more then others, specific sigils over others and so on.

When adding glyph of rune strike, my threat actually goes down 1 point versus not activating it at all.

Hmm for some reason while im under hit cap, it prefers 10str + 10 crit over 10str + 10 hit, kind of weird, since it should be no brainer that under hit cap, hit>crit. Maybe the 4piece t9 bonus puts crit rating value too high.

Is there a Tank DK thread for rawr? I have noticed a number of issues (like sigil of virulence addings 600 strength and the relative stat value of stamina being stuck at 1) but I don't want to clutter up the DKDPS thread if possible.