Hunters do. That sheet and the list on MMO Champions do not include the hunter venoms or the pet debuffs. The 3 different hunters venoms provide (a hunter can only use one at a time, and an MM hunter gets a special effect when they use Chimera Shot):
Scorpid: armor debuff (also allows a MM to disarm the target)
Viper: spell cast speed debuff (also allows an MM to drain mana)
Widow: healing debuff (also allows an MM to self-heal)

The pet debuffs are still TBD.

He also contradicted himself though when talking about Hunters, who were asking why they brought Replenishment when they no longer needed it, although the effect was that they would also bring another raid buff... That does put Moonkin Form in an awkward place though since it is still nothing more than a skin for a raid buff (even if we almost all adore our beloved chicken forms). I'm not even against the talents that increase our spell power (read: intellect) while in Moonkin Form. I just believe that this sort of effect should be innate to Moonkin Form itself.

Edit:

I meant to bring something else up as I was skimming the changes earlier. There was an interesting Fire Mage change that should give some insight into what we can expect out of Lunar Shower. Scorch will now be castable on the move while Molten Armor is active. That gives them a DPS ability they can use while moving similar to the intended design of our wayward Moonfire talent. Now, I'll admit I have no clue how much damage scorch does now, but Improved Scorch also reduces the mana cost of the spell to 0. I think it's safe to draw the parallels between the two abilities while in movement and we can safely assume that our damage from Moonfire will be reasonably the same as the damage provided by Scorch. I wouldn't go off the edge into theorycrafting around this correlation, but like I said it does provide some useful insight.

On the Moonfire damage, I would not say anything till the final numbers are in, for all we know they could boost the damage of the spell at 85 to make Lunar Shower worth it, and if not they could simply change it so the DD portion is doubled on each stack or they implement Lissana's suggestion that has the DD damage bit naturally increased substantially and the dot tick small but stackable to 3 times. Who knows

It's sad that comment, and tbh, this is the main problem with much of balance, spells that you just cast when off cooldown or refresh when down, no real intelligent decision making necessary to further maximize damage. Effectively reducing the skill factor necessary to master the class. As it is, the difference between an unskilled moonkin and a skilled one would be small.

1. Take Eclipse, to get it going you spam one spell. It procs you spam another. Very predictable, flat. Wanna shake things up a bit? How about Euphoria adds a clause that allows MF and IS to sometimes switch the type of eclipse power gained by the wrath/starfire and increasing it by 50% on the next cast only, and also only when an eclipse is not active. So effectively, at random moments in spamming one nuke to proc an eclipse, your starfire will instead give lunar power and your wrath solar power with an extra 50% on the next cast only, so you'd sorta have to pay attention for those moments and you'd reduce your eclipse down time by switching to the opposite spell.

This immediately works some unpredictability, and rewards the more skillful players.

2. Still on Eclipse. Adopt the strategy that a balance druid will aim to maximize the uptime of eclipse (make it last as long as possible) and minimize the downtime too, point 1 made some skill involved in minimizing the downtime, lets look at ways we can intelligently maximize the uptime.

If SS casting will help eclipse uptime last longer, why don't we give the balance druid interesting ways during an eclipse to knock seconds of the cooldown of starsurge via clever casting. So the more intelligently you cast, the shorter your starsurge cooldown will be = more SS = higher uptime = more dps. You could off course cast the opposite nuke, but that's the dumb way to extend the uptime because the opposite nuke is not boosted under eclipse. Give a smarter option:

How? I'm a big fan of introducing interaction between dots and nuke, I'm also a big fan of eclipse doing exactly that as it provides the perfect vehicle for this with its Lunar eclipse tied to arcane and solar eclipse tied to nature. Lunar eclipse should allow the interaction between arcane spells dots and nukes, cooldowns, and solar eclipse nature spells. We know that arcane and nature for balance are too similar atm, they behave identically too under either eclipse, a clear way to distinguish them is to allow them to interact in interesting but different ways under their respective eclipses. I repeat, eclipse is the perfect mechanic to bake that into as you have the arcane portion and the nature portion. Let the interactions be different and you immediately give an interesting dimension,a nd also raise the level of skill needed to maximize the class.

I am a big fan of decision making, and rewarding more skillful players wiht higher dps to. I am also quite fine with the average moonkin (and hybrid caster) doing somewhat less dps than the average mage/warlock, but the master balance druid (and hybrid caster) should be neck and neck with the master mage/lock. When this happens the QQ on pure v hybrid dps will melt awya, as most players are average, pures will be happy that they do higher dps, however amongst the top players, it would be hardly distinguishable. WHen average moonkins complain, they'll alwyas be top players with the stats to prove that they just need to master. ANd the pures won't complain b/c their average skilled players are doing better. For it to work the class mechanics must create the necessary skill gap.

Concept? Good balance druids will be switching nukes to minimize downtime of eclipse as point 1 stated, they'd also be maximizing eclipse uptime by making full use of the spell interactions during an eclipse that shorten the cooldown of starsurge. Take this an rough armchair example:
They are just examples of possible interactions you can have under each eclipse, presented as talents that offer interesting options.

Moonkin form can also be something that at least requires some amount of skill. Rather than just a passive 5%haste, let the balance druid have the Moon aura regardless of form, let fuoror do something non-damage boosting to moonkin form, and voila you have a moonkin form that can do other things. Something that the player needs to make a decision, either a cooldown like ToL form, or alternatively you could make those interactions mentioned above only available if you switch to moonkin form during an eclipse. I'm a bigger fan of the cooldown though, because at least that way, finally normal balance spells will actually do something extra.

As an example going to moonkin form could change defensive spells to work better than caster form. This is to make up for not being able to heal, no reason why thorns, roots and cyclone shouldn't be cast better always in moonkin form as it can't heal, you could add perks for typhoon, FF, solar beam and wild mushroom too. On the cooldown bit though, the offensive spells cast better and their are many things you could do. Off the top of my head: a) Hurricane doesn't require channelling, FoN & Starfall both reset cooldowns and last twice as long if cast during the empower. IS will always crit & starfire will hit 2 additional nearby targets.

This way again rewards skillful players who will have to learn the perks of using the form as it modifies spells and will have to choose when best to blow the empower cooldown. Decision making rewarded. Which doesn't happen at all currently.

ah, the failure to switch punishing dps further was with respect to the armchair design idea of dots switching the eclipse power of nukes. I was just reminding Videl that it was a raw concept to illustrate making the spam to achieve eclipse (i.e. just one nuke only) and the spam during an eclipse ( the other nuke only) more interesting and less predictable. If it were to be taken seriously, which lets face it our specific ideas never are, then it would need some work , some polish ofc to iron out some of the chinks that Videl pointed out. However there is no point exploring such things further, blizzard will surely come up with their own ways of making achieving eclipse and casting during it less predictable/monotonous/boring than the current iteration presents. IF they did decide to use something similar to what i suggested, they'd obviously implement it in a much better way at the end.

For e.g. a way to overcome VIidel's astuate observation with the mechanic would simply be to let the dot rather than inverse the eclipse power of both nukes, cause the two nukes to generate the same eclipse power instead, and reward casting the nuke that was inverted with 50% more eclipse power. That way failure to switch wouldn't double punish the bad player as Videl picked up, however switching would reward the good player with a lower eclipse downtime.. Next cast issues, the other issue he pointed out, and lag are easily overcome, we've seen them do this with other proc mechanics, what you do is make this inverse proc from the dot last up to 5 secs but only affects the next cast of the opposite nuke. So it would work like this.

e.g. You start spamming wrath and gaining lunar power (upsetting the balance), if your dots are up, this talent will proc, if you're heading towards a lunar eclipse and it procs, it simply means that if you cast starfire within the next 5secs, it will instead generate lunar power, and about 50% more eclipse power than it would normal give. afterwards casting SF again will give you its normal solar power. The same thing if you were working towards a solar eclipse it means at the proc wrath if cast within 5secs will generate solar power at 50% more than normal. Thus encouraging you to break up the mindless spam.

It's just one way of introducing some rng element to make the spamming less predictable, and to keep you reacting. Ofc how this all works depends on the model of eclipse finally used, if casting starfire during a lunar eclipse is suppose to take you to the verge of a solar eclipse and there is literally no eclipse down time, then, this wouldn't work, you'd have to find another means of doing so.

Ideally, my eclipse model will have two portions, a downtime and an uptime, and you are to employ strategies and interactions that some new exciting talents will give, (like lunar focus, solar focus and this Euphoria dot inversion in that armchair example above ) to lengthen the uptime of eclipse and reduce the down time.

Which means normally casting, before picking up those interaction talents,, there will always be an eclipse down time and an eclipse up time that can be extended, with a little room to wiggle about and not be punished by movement. All in all, a master balance druid having now picked up the interaction talents and fully using thme will be skilled at maximizing up time and minimizing downtime, and he will do this a lot better than an average balance druid and thus yield more dps.

As eclipse power generated does not scale with the damage of your wraths/starfire/SS, the amount of up time and down time will not scale with gear at all. So you don't have a situation where cleverly using your spells to maximize your uptime and reduce your downtime is meaningless because you're in super gear. Gear will cause your spell themselves to do more damage anyway in and off themselves. The flat damage of eclipse will be boosted sufficiently by mastery too. The bonus damage is what your skill increases, if you master all your rotations, sequences, react quickly, know your spec well, you should be achieving eclipse faster than poorer players and keeping it up longer, thus doing even more damage, sufficient enough for playstyle to be tweaked to account for anything from an extra 15-40% dps over poorer players in similar gear.

Skill should matter
The spec should be fun and interesting. Total predictability is boring
Eclipse should have more layers to it - i love the idea of hacing arane spell interact differently under lunar from nature spells under solar, the interactions only working during an eclipse really define the moment and demand a more skillful playstyle when they're up, but if the player isn't that skillful, then at least he still gets the flat damage boost during that.
I like that we are seeking the balance between nature and arcane, and i'd like each of these schools to have a prominent theme, could be as simple as arcane is more chancy i.e. chaotic, and nature more sustainable and steady, reflected by the arcane spell interactions involving lots of chance to do x or y based on crit, and nature more like if x is present, then y does more damage, and it builds up with z thrown into the fray etc.

I love the new eclipse model, it overcame the bad RNG from the old model that had too much of a damage swing based on whether eclipse was up or dont. The new model you can control when your eclipse procs, and you have enough leg room not to be penealized with movement, that's great... now it's a much better model to throw in a bit of r'n'g in the casting of the nukes, and some interactions between the spells to make it more interesting. We damaned blizzard when they made the old eclipse model to rng, seems ironic that we are asking now for a little bit more unpredictability in the new model, But i can hope you see that the new model is a far better model to cope with unpredictability, and that a little bit of it here and there really spice up the whole gameplay.

See very interesting beta forum topic here:
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm Beta - (English) Forums -> [Feedback] Balance Druid 12694

and Moonkin Repository Topic here:
The Moonkin Repository • View topic - 3 things about balance 12694

These themes are really been discussed at their core there. On a lighter note, judging by the classes GC is responding too on the forum, i am not expecting any balance druid changes this week or next, he tends to talk about the classes whom have just received changes and those they are working on at the moment, and whatever they are working on today is seen 1 week later on the beta patch. So, I think we'll just get minor tweaks as a result of balancing elsewhere.