Yup, that's already been changed.

Update: I have a German Vista 64-bit, but a German Excel 2003 (I assume 32-bit due to the software info; 64-bit is not mentioned there). But I still get the same error code. Any idea? I wrote "Die Todeskrallen" in the realm field (that's the german name for the server).

Is there any easy way to make the text more readable without screwing up the cells? Ever since the battle.net import feature the text has been very hard to read.

This works. It's even more computation-intensive for a small fix, but I haven't worried about that too much yet; it probably doesn't matter on most people's computers. If I really cared about making the scaling factors compute faster I could probably remove a bunch of tables for really irrelevant things.

I think Tecton just likes to save it with the zoom at 70%; check your zoom.

----------

Here's a version with a really simple Dragonwrath model. Just multiplies damage of all spells up by the proc rate, and also all energy gains. If it works the way people say above, that should actually be pretty solid except for a couple details. I have no idea what the proc rate is so I arbitrarily put in 5% for now. This makes it worth about 5.5% DPS due to increased NG uptime, which should give an idea of how it will work whenever we find out the real proc rate.

Yeah, the tooltip is wrong. Use it at a dummy and watch your mastery.

The current estimated proc rate for Moonkin is 11%. There has also been some speculation on the Rawr team that Dragonwrath has a different proc rate per spell. It'd be nice to get ahold of a few combat logs with the staff to find out.

Yeah, that appears to be the same issue (64 bit versions of Windows prior to Windows 7 are extremely poorly supported). Apologies, but I'm unaware of anything I could do to get around that.

As Hamlet says, this is my fault. I zoom it out while working on some of the hidden columns and keep forgetting to fix it back to 100% before uploading. Amending the zoom level will sort it, and I'll do my best not to forget!

That's going to be a quite astonishing amount of DPS then, from doing a quick edit. In the roughly BiS profile I have saved in the sheet, you're looking at ~5.3k DPS from the proc alone? How confident are we in these figures?

I'm not 100% sure. This info came from Hinalover, who gleaned it from the Mage and Moonkin threads in the official forums. He said the initial proc rates were estimated at 10% for mages and 11% for moonkin.

TLDR: Discussion about how WC computes some rotation numbers.

Rotation page, Nukes cast per phase. I think the right equation is

NumberOfNukeCasts = EnergyGeneratedDuringPhase / EnergyPerNukeCast

For eclipse phases, WC uses

EnergyGeneratedDuringPhase = 100 + NukeEnergy/2

which says that on average, you'll go about a half-nuke past zero when leaving Eclipse. That seems reasonable. Perhaps a bit pessimistic.

For pre-eclipse phases, WC uses (ignoring gory Euphoria details):

EnergyGeneratedDuringPhase = 100 - NukeEnergy/2

the idea being you get to use that extra energy from the eclipse phase to help reach the next eclipse. That is true, but it is also true that you'll end up wasting about half of your last nuke. 4t12 means that you actually end up wasting half of a bigger energy amount. I think this should be changed to something closer to

EnergyGeneratedDuringPhase = 100 # Possibly add 4t12Energy / 2

WC uses:

EnergyPerNukeCast = EnergyFromNuke / (1 - StarsurgeEnergyRate / NukeSpamEnergyRate)

which has the right general form of giving fewer nuke casts when you get more SS energy. However I think it has some problems (for instance if I had a glyph that caused Wrath to generate only 1 energy, this formula would give a negative number). I think the correct formula is along the lines of

EnergyPerNukeCast = EnergyFromNuke * (1 + StarsurgeEnergyRate / (NukeSpamEnergyRate * NukeUptimeRatio))

Using NukeUptimeRatio might cause a circular dependency, in which case just pick a reasonable number around 0.7s.
Even this is a bit optimistic, because it ignores the fact that most Moonkin would rather not enter Eclipse with the energy from a StarSurge.

Current WC, using the Legendary with a 11% proc rate says there are ~2.5 Starfires cast during pre-solar. To get an average that low with a discrete simulator, you'd need a rotation along the lines of (SF SS)* and that just isn't going to happen. A more reasonable average number is about 3 SF casts, and I think my suggested changes get you closer.

I read through the pages and wanted to make sure it wasn't something that somebody had already brought up, but it appears that the first and second versions of the legendary staff (being branch of nordrassil, and runestaff of nordrassil, respectively) are showing as having crit in wrathcalcs, when they actually have haste instead of crit.

EDIT: My mistake, someone did point this out for the branch. However, it is also this way with the runestaff of nordrassil, it could just be like this for the main page version of WC though. I'm an OO user so I haven't picked up the latest version from this particular thread.

Forgot Balance of Power.