[Balance] WrathCalcs - Page 37

♦ Tecton · 10/08/12, 4:15 AM

Originally Posted by Latas

I'm pretty sure it is just the jp and honor items. Might want to double check after updating those to be sure though.

Also one other thing I just found out. Wrathcalcs seems to be calculating the base int of at least worgen at 90 as 152 when my character is showing 183. Spirit should also be 187 and stamina 120. I don't know the correct values for the other races but it's something to look into.

Looks like the base stats have changed since some time in beta, then. Can I get a night elf, tauren and troll to post their base stats too? Thanks! Will update once I have them all.

Originally Posted by CaseyTheRetard

The trinket with Item ID 77530 has some incorrect info in the WrathCalcs gear database:
is: "Pandaren Dragonling" item level 457 with 801 Mastery.
should be: "Ghost Iron Dragonling" item level 450 with 0 Mastery.

Thanks! Updated.

Originally Posted by nephyron

Gem id: 76651
Energized Wild Jade
+160 Haste and +160 Spirit
Item Level 90
"Matches a Yellow or Blue Socket."
Sell Price: 4

Gem id: 76585
Perfect Energized Alexandrite
+160 Haste and +160 Spirit
Item Level 88
"Matches a Yellow or Blue Socket."

Those gems are missing and the Dreadful Gladiator items' stats need to be updated.

Added all Energized gems, thanks for the catch on that. I think it was just the OH changes I'd missed in the previous version regarding the PvP gear, that should be updated now too.

Originally Posted by Stommped

I think it would be cool if we could at button to lower the item level of our gear to 463. This way if we are attempting to do Challenge Modes, we know how to change our reforging to stay above the haste cap. Not sure if this is possible or not.

How easy this will be to implement really depends on the way the gear is scaling. At least it's fairly easy to do tests!

New version below.

Please note: judging from my profile, the armory appears to displaying slightly old information. Specifically, I had two upgrades last night that aren't showing on my gear sheet or in my activity feed. I'm sure it'll catch up shortly, but please don't report incorrect items if that's what is actually on your armory page! That said, all the feedback/checks are much appreciated.

Stommped · 10/10/12, 7:17 PM

You can go ahead and change Windsong back. They seemed to have fixed whatever it was causing it to not proc enough for casters.

• Hamlet · 10/10/12, 7:29 PM

Good to know--will fix once I see what actual proc rate is.

(Surely not the 1ppm or so for each proc that I had on beta--that would still be way too good.)

Stommped · 10/11/12, 1:15 AM

Yeah it doesnt feel as good as it was on beta, and it still (correctly) does not proc from dots. But there were several situations tonight where I noticed multiple procs, which was almost never happening before. It procs the most by far during Starfall which is nice because you usually end up with at least a double proc going into your first CA at the start of the fight.

• Hamlet · 10/11/12, 2:03 AM

Sure it's not proccing from DoT's. Thought I saw it proc from a HoT earlier--will look again tomorrow. Either way, doing any kind of full-time casting as either Balance or Resto was getting me multiple procs per minute.

Sunfyre · 10/11/12, 7:51 PM

WrathCalcs is showing HotW+FoN as my best combination, by a considerable amount, with SotF+HotW being a distant second. All my logs with trees don't reflect this. Any ideas?

♦ Tecton · 10/11/12, 7:54 PM

You're probably using an older version which had 11 casts put in for checking T14 BiS. Either download a newer version (which should have 6 casts) or edit it. The precise number of casts is still needing testing at various haste levels.

Sunfyre · 10/12/12, 2:24 AM

Originally Posted by Tecton

You're probably using an older version which had 11 casts put in for checking T14 BiS. Either download a newer version (which should have 6 casts) or edit it. The precise number of casts is still needing testing at various haste levels.

Thanks, that seems to have fixed it. I'm still showing SotF+HotW as the best combination and from what I've seen from testing and logs, that doesn't seem to be the case. I've been favoring Inc/NV (as have most top parses). I'll keep playing around on dummies and in logs. We have two similarly geared moonkin so I'll see if we can try opposite specs.

• Hamlet · 10/12/12, 11:37 AM

Here's updated nuke coefficients and Windsong. Windsong is just back to what I did in beta--each proc procs once per minute, increased by haste, independently of each other. It's not super detailed, but should be in the right ballpark and scales with haste. Currently getting about 30% uptime for each buff (in the BIS high-haste setup), let me know if that seems like it's way off.

♦ Tecton · 10/12/12, 12:59 PM

Just noticed that Perfect Piercing Alexandrite is mislabelled as Haste/Crit. It's giving the right stats (Crit/Hit) though. I'll fix it next time I update. LFR Feng's Ring of Dreams needs to be added too.

Latas · 10/12/12, 3:58 PM

I can't seem to import my old profile. It keeps saying the clipboard doesn't contain a profile. Usually when I import wrong it just claims the clipboard contains nothing so I am not sure what the problem is now.

♦ Tecton · 10/12/12, 4:01 PM

How old is this profile? They got updated a while ago to a new format for all the talent changes/etc.

Latas · 10/12/12, 4:17 PM

Originally Posted by Tecton

How old is this profile? They got updated a while ago to a new format for all the talent changes/etc.

I am trying to export my profile from the 121005 version.

• Hamlet · 10/12/12, 4:29 PM

In case this matters, check that the names used for talent cells ("tal15" "tal30" etc.) haven't changed--at least one version of Excel I tried to open in recently wanted to add an underscore since the names might crash with valid cell references.

Latas · 10/12/12, 5:18 PM

Originally Posted by Hamlet

In case this matters, check that the names used for talent cells ("tal15" "tal30" etc.) haven't changed--at least one version of Excel I tried to open in recently wanted to add an underscore since the names might crash with valid cell references.

The names all seem to be the same in both versions.