Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Class Mechanics » Druids

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09/16/08, 2:03 PM   #1951
Malazaar
Don Flamenco
 
Tauren Druid
 
Gul'dan (EU)
Mijae, could you please post the stats you are basing your calculations on ?

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 2:05 PM   #1952
Tap
Don Flamenco
 
Tap's Avatar
 
Fyte
Worgen Druid
 
<TTU>
No WoW Account
Mijae, are your Avoidance values based against mobs that are level 80, or versus ??? level bosses?

Last edited by Tap : 09/16/08 at 2:24 PM.

Originally Posted by Scorned
Be careful what you wish for. AUGH TANK TIME is always skulking in the shadows, waiting to strike.

United States Offline
Old 09/16/08, 2:14 PM   #1953
foxglove
Piston Honda
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Uldum
Originally Posted by Liar View Post
You do realize that Mother Bear (or Protector of the Pack like it's called now I believe) is also giving you magic mitigation which you did not have before, right? So it's not really fair to say you need to dump 3 points in there just to be even.
Well, yes and no. With the changes to T6 and dodge diminishing returns, I need the new talents (Mother Bear, Natural Reaction) in order to get back to near the same level of time-to-live. Assuming 12% damage reduction from Mother Bear, I estimated that I'll be taking about 7% more physical damage and of course 12% less magic damage; and the 6% dodge from Natural Reaction more or less makes up for the lost dodge due to DR. Are these good changes in the long run? Probably. However, it still is pretty much required to take those points at 70 if I want to continue tanking in Sunwell.

Edit: Of course, Blizzard really did need to nerf T6 in order to add Mother Bear; we'd have been ridiculously strong tanks otherwise.

The side effect I don't like is that I have to give up my points in Resto to get that tank spec and cripple somewhat my cat DPS, which is disappointing. I liked seeing that orange bar in the top 3 or so.

Originally Posted by halmmar View Post
Not to mention the ability to use things like healthstones, ironshield potions and benefit from ancestral fortitude/inspiration.
The huge array of cooldowns we can use to tank bosses during enrage phases / survive burst damage is greatly improved (especially since incoming damage will be more predictable).
Well--I already had the ability to use healthstones and potions, albeit only when the GCD was up. And doesn't the new "potion sickness" sort of declaw whatever benefit we might get from easier consumable use in forms? Edit: I do agree that having a use for Inspiration is nice; it always annoyed me a bit that one part of my healer's heals was wasted on me but not the prot tanks (even if being armor capped made me the preferred tank for a lot of encounters).

Last edited by foxglove : 09/16/08 at 2:26 PM.

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 3:26 PM   #1954
Garanthir
Piston Honda
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Eldre'Thalas
Glyph of Mangle

I was looking at this Glyph last night on Beta and I think this would be a way to save a few talent points by not using Improved Mangle(if anyone is). In Cat form with the Glyph it appears to be an obvious DPS bonus via an 18 second duration. I was thinking that it also might be a way to save points in Bear form too. I guess it would be a comparison of Mangle more often vs Maul/Swipe/Lacerate more often, but possibly buffed with other "Cat" form talents picked up with the saved points.

Does that make sense? I am having an extremely hard time putting this thought in to words today.

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 4:03 PM   #1955
Mara
Glass Joe
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Cenarion Circle
Originally Posted by Mijae View Post
Note - if my calculations are right, our threat isn't nearly enough to keep up with dps. Have they made more changes to threat other than making the bear bonus passive? I remember hearing something about changes to give passive blessing salvation also?
Mijae: They "baked in" the threat from talents into Warriors and Paladins. They DID NOT do this for Bears. Supposedly, they adjusted bear dps upwards, to increase our threat to comparable levels [i.e. talent increases swipe damage and base damage values were supposedly increased]. Color me skeptical, but I'm certainly open to seeing figures. Maybe I can get our Warrior MT to do some threat tests with me.

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 4:14 PM   #1956
kalbear
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Balnazzar
Mijae: They "baked in" the threat from talents into Warriors and Paladins. They DID NOT do this for Bears. Supposedly, they adjusted bear dps upwards, to increase our threat to comparable levels [i.e. talent increases swipe damage and base damage values were supposedly increased]. Color me skeptical, but I'm certainly open to seeing figures. Maybe I can get our Warrior MT to do some threat tests with me.
They baked in the threat for bears as well. This was not mentioned in patch notes but was confirmed from blizzard comments. All 'improved' versions were brought as baseline, making druid threat in bear form a stock 45% increase.

United States Offline
Old 09/16/08, 4:15 PM   #1957
• Melthu
Confused
 
Troll Druid
 
Alterac Mountains
Originally Posted by Garanthir View Post
I was looking at this Glyph last night on Beta and I think this would be a way to save a few talent points by not using Improved Mangle(if anyone is). In Cat form with the Glyph it appears to be an obvious DPS bonus via an 18 second duration. I was thinking that it also might be a way to save points in Bear form too. I guess it would be a comparison of Mangle more often vs Maul/Swipe/Lacerate more often, but possibly buffed with other "Cat" form talents picked up with the saved points.

Does that make sense? I am having an extremely hard time putting this thought in to words today.
If I understand you right you're saying that we would be able to leave Improved Mangle at 0/3 and spend those points on other threat improving talents since we could extend Mangle's duration with the glyph. The problem with that way of thinking is that we don't use mangle for the debuff (at least not while tanking), we use it because it's our highest threat per rage attack. Lowering its cooldown allows us to use it more often, leading to improved threat generation. The duration of its debuff is irrelevant.

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 4:23 PM   #1958
Selmarix
Piston Honda
 
Dwarf Hunter
 
Turalyon (EU)
Salvation is also included in the threat of tank classes now, probably by applying this:
Tank Class Passive Threat - Spell - World of Warcraft

Why they did not include it in the existing passive tanking buffs I can only guess that it is because Righteous Fury currently only increases holy threat while the new buff increases all threat even for paladins.

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 4:27 PM   #1959
kalbear
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Balnazzar
Why they did not include it in the existing passive tanking buffs I can only guess that it is because Righteous Fury currently only increases holy threat while the new buff increases all threat even for paladins.
I don't believe this is implemented currently; it probably was a datamined spell that doesn't actually get applied. Salvation was baked in basically to tank's abilities by increasing the threat they output, usually by increasing the damage they do.

United States Offline
Old 09/16/08, 4:30 PM   #1960
Garanthir
Piston Honda
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Eldre'Thalas
Originally Posted by Melthu View Post
If I understand you right you're saying that we would be able to leave Improved Mangle at 0/3 and spend those points on other threat improving talents since we could extend Mangle's duration with the glyph. The problem with that way of thinking is that we don't use mangle for the debuff (at least not while tanking), we use it because it's our highest threat per rage attack. Lowering its cooldown allows us to use it more often, leading to improved threat generation. The duration of its debuff is irrelevant.

Yes that was my thought, although I believe the debuff IS of importance in Bear form since it buffs Maul and Swipe damage. So lets say you traded 3/3 Imp Mangle to help finish out Master Shapeshifter. You're trading a reduced cooldown for a 4% buff to ALL physical damage.

I guess it comes down to how much TPS is a 4.5 sec CD Mangle vs. a 6 sec CD Mangle and increased Maul,Swipe, Lacerate, and white damage?

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 5:24 PM   #1961
halmmar
Piston Honda
 
Tauren Druid
 
<Zen>
Xavius (EU)
Originally Posted by Garanthir View Post
Yes that was my thought, although I believe the debuff IS of importance in Bear form since it buffs Maul and Swipe damage. So lets say you traded 3/3 Imp Mangle to help finish out Master Shapeshifter. You're trading a reduced cooldown for a 4% buff to ALL physical damage.

I guess it comes down to how much TPS is a 4.5 sec CD Mangle vs. a 6 sec CD Mangle and increased Maul,Swipe, Lacerate, and white damage?
If we just compare those two talents and figures I have from live servers...
I do around 1100 TPS (700 DPS). A 4% DPS increase is around 40 TPS (a bit lower than a 4% threat increase due to static values on skills).

Each mangle is around 1380 threat. A Swipe is 470 threat (T6 bonus, similar to 2.3 talents). If you go from 3 * (1 Mangle 3 Swipe) to 4*(1 Mangle 2 Swipe), you will generate 8370 vs. 9280 threat (over 12*1.5 = 18 seconds). That's a 50 TPS increase (on single targets).

So Improved Mangle should be better for threat, and will cost you fewer talent points than master shapeshifter. Not to mention, you can skip OoC if you want to be a pure bear.

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 5:45 PM   #1962
Garanthir
Piston Honda
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Eldre'Thalas
Originally Posted by halmmar View Post
If we just compare those two talents and figures I have from live servers...
I do around 1100 TPS (700 DPS). A 4% DPS increase is around 40 TPS (a bit lower than a 4% threat increase due to static values on skills).

Each mangle is around 1380 threat. A Swipe is 470 threat (T6 bonus, similar to 2.3 talents). If you go from 3 * (1 Mangle 3 Swipe) to 4*(1 Mangle 2 Swipe), you will generate 8370 vs. 9280 threat (over 12*1.5 = 18 seconds). That's a 50 TPS increase (on single targets).

So Improved Mangle should be better for threat, and will cost you fewer talent points than master shapeshifter. Not to mention, you can skip OoC if you want to be a pure bear.
Are those rotations with or without Maul? I should also add what prompted me to think about all this was trying to have a single PvE spec and try to give up as little as possible on both sides. I am still clinging to simply swapping gear instead of specs when we change roles.

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 5:58 PM   #1963
kalbear
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Balnazzar
Are those rotations with or without Maul? I should also add what prompted me to think about all this was trying to have a single PvE spec and try to give up as little as possible on both sides. I am still clinging to simply swapping gear instead of specs when we change roles.
Maul doesn't matter one way or another in this. A 6 second or 4.5 second mangle will keep the mangle debuff up, and Maul doesn't take any GCD.

In addition to this, the damage that mangle is doing is going to be buffed with talents in WotLK, so the effect of more mangles should be even more greatly pronounced.

That all being said, when looking at the analysis of my own threat parses, I notice that mangle is about 20% of my total threat, and lacerate & swipe is also about 20% of my total threat. Increasing the number of mangles by 33% is going to reduce the number of swipes/lacerates by a similar 33%. This may not end up being that great a talent unless mangle is significantly buffed.

United States Offline
Old 09/16/08, 6:01 PM   #1964
Garanthir
Piston Honda
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Eldre'Thalas
Originally Posted by kalbear View Post
Maul doesn't matter one way or another in this. A 6 second or 4.5 second mangle will keep the mangle debuff up, and Maul doesn't take any GCD.

In addition to this, the damage that mangle is doing is going to be buffed with talents in WotLK, so the effect of more mangles should be even more greatly pronounced.
Wouldn't Maul benefit from the 4% increase in damage with Master Shapeshifter?

Edit: I replied too quickly and missed your last statement. I agree that it might turn out to be a "low priority" talent, especially for those who attempt to build a "multi role" spec.

Offline
Old 09/16/08, 6:11 PM   #1965
foxglove
Piston Honda
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Uldum
Originally Posted by Garanthir View Post
I was looking at this Glyph last night on Beta and I think this would be a way to save a few talent points by not using Improved Mangle(if anyone is). In Cat form with the Glyph it appears to be an obvious DPS bonus via an 18 second duration. I was thinking that it also might be a way to save points in Bear form too. I guess it would be a comparison of Mangle more often vs Maul/Swipe/Lacerate more often, but possibly buffed with other "Cat" form talents picked up with the saved points.

Does that make sense? I am having an extremely hard time putting this thought in to words today.
The mangle glyph is pretty much entirely a cat glyph as I see it. It would certainly be useful--managing the "out of synch" Rips and Mangles is a bit of a headache for me on the PTR. It'd definitely be a good choice for cat because it:
  • Increases DPS by allowing us to "convert" Mangles to Shreds
  • Eliminates the worry of Mangle dropping mid-cycle (risk of non-mangled Rip ticks, snarled-up timing of TF and FB, etc.)
  • Makes cat more playable and reduces tunnel vision

My only concern is that I am pretty sure I want to get both the Frenzied Regeneration and Swipe glyphs, leaving only one DPS glyph (as I mentioned earlier). If they keep the system and mats as they currently are, I might be carrying around stacks of Swipe and Mangle glyphs in my raid bag. (I don't particularly want to make my raiding main a scribe just for an extra inscription slot, if indeed that becomes an option.)

Originally Posted by Garanthir View Post
Wouldn't Maul benefit from the 4% increase in damage with Master Shapeshifter?

Edit: I replied too quickly and missed your last statement. I agree that it might turn out to be a "low priority" talent, especially for those who attempt to build a "multi role" spec.
See Mijae's post with TPS values per point for each talent (back a few pages). The spreadsheet in Mijae's signature also has TPS calculations based on the stats/gear you input, with a couple "default" level 80 setups.

Personally, based on the preliminary TPS numbers, I decided to move those 5 points (Natural + Master Shapeshifter) into Feral talents that have about-equal Cat utility and better TPS (Predatory Instincts or Rend and Tear, depending on your preference).

Last edited by foxglove : 09/16/08 at 6:37 PM. Reason: added link to cited post since it's 10 pages back already

Offline
Closed Thread

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Class Mechanics » Druids

Thread Tools