Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Druids

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11/06/08, 12:09 PM   #3576
slant
Don Flamenco
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Drenden
Originally Posted by kalbear View Post
If they do not add some other method of scaling and do not change dodge's DR, simply bears will become worse than other tanks at some point in the future
That's it in a nutshell, and my concern is that the T8 content is released in 3.1, which kicks off the new arena season, and the devs are unable to fix the problem until the season is over or even worse until the next expansion. According to GC that's exactly what happened in TBC. They didn't want to implement major class balance changes due to the impact on e-sports arena play. Bear stat scaling should be addressed now, before the WOTLK arena season starts.

United States Offline
Old 11/06/08, 12:25 PM   #3577
pdpi
Von Kaiser
 
Tauren Druid
 
Argent Dawn (EU)
Originally Posted by Deathwing View Post
What's your source on the diminishing returns for bears being different than other tanks? As far as I know, it's the same for every class.
You might want to look at this.

It's not that the model is different, only that the scaling coefficients are adjusted per class.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 1:13 PM   #3578
Deathwing
Bald Bull
 
Deathwing's Avatar
 
Orc Warrior
 
Black Dragonflight
Someone pointed that out to me. Those scaling differences end up making very little difference. At very low(200 DR) percentages of raw dodge, the other tanks come out with slightly higher dodge than druids do! It takes ~1035 raw dodge rating for druids to get 1% more actual dodge than the other tanks. That's not enough of a scaling difference. My guess is that 'k' needs to lowered a bit or 'c' needs to raised.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 1:50 PM   #3579
pdpi
Von Kaiser
 
Tauren Druid
 
Argent Dawn (EU)
Originally Posted by Deathwing View Post
Someone pointed that out to me. Those scaling differences end up making very little difference. At very low(200 DR) percentages of raw dodge, the other tanks come out with slightly higher dodge than druids do! It takes ~1035 raw dodge rating for druids to get 1% more actual dodge than the other tanks. That's not enough of a scaling difference. My guess is that 'k' needs to lowered a bit or 'c' needs to raised.
From what I understood, the formulas are applied to total dodge and parry (so after agility or strength, defense and dodge/parry rating), not to the rating itself. As a druid you'll be getting plenty of agility too, at a favorable 40ish agi per dodge %, rather than slightly over 70 like warriors or DKs, or 50 for paladins, (all values before DR).

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 2:04 PM   #3580
Deathwing
Bald Bull
 
Deathwing's Avatar
 
Orc Warrior
 
Black Dragonflight
I was converting the DR to dodge before diminishing it. I realize that druids will get "better" dodge through kings/sotf/agi and the diminishing returns formula, but all of those aren't enough to overcome the stat budget's formula for single stat stacking. And lets not forget poor itemization on accessories.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 2:55 PM   #3581
tlbj6142
Piston Honda
 
Tauren Druid
 
Steamwheedle Cartel
Aaah! I'm pulling my hair out (what little is left) looking for this...

Wasn't there a post that contained DPE or DPS per talent point for each talent? I can find the bear TPS version, but I can't find the Cat version. Any ideas where that post is located? I'm trying to decide between a couple of different builds for leveling and would like that information...

Thanks.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 2:57 PM   #3582
jacclark
Von Kaiser
 
Night Elf Death Knight
 
Lightning's Blade
Originally Posted by slant View Post
The root of the problem is that bears benefit from less stats than other tanks and are asked to share the same off-set items. Previously we could (and did) just stack dodge. With diminishing returns that's markedly less effective.

Ignoring parry and block ratings for now, the solution can be pretty simple. Just give bears more miss and dodge from each point of defense. I suggest 0.10%, two and half times the normal amount, to make the numbers match up.

Take an item like [Deflection Band]. Its 28 defense rating provides the following benefit to plate tanks, barring block for DKs:

5.01 defense skill = 0.20% miss/block/dodge/anticrit/parry = 1.00% total avoidance

With the change to each point of defense skill providing 0.10% miss/dodge for bears, for druids the defense on the same ring would provide:

5.01 defense skill = 0.50% miss/dodge = 1.00% total avoidance

This is a an elegant solution. Would it scale fairly? Would we be choosing between rings, neck, trinkets that possess defense over dodge over expertise over agility / stamina?

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 3:15 PM   #3583
Neddie
Von Kaiser
 
Human Death Knight
 
Smolderthorn
Originally Posted by Vaccine View Post
You realise theres absolutely zero benefit of doing this? At best it will mean we're already crit capped from the jewelery we wear and at worse it will force us to once more bring dire PvP items into the mix for their resilience. There is no positive in doing that.
It would mean that we have to wear jewelry, trinkets or necks with defense on them. I think that's a good thing. If we're crit immune from talents and don't value armor, by default our rings, trinkets, necks, etc. will all be DPS gear. For reasons I explained earlier in the thread, I don't think that's a good thing. Tanks should have to wear at least some tanking gear while tanking.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 3:21 PM   #3584
Stejo
Von Kaiser
 
Stejo's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Priest
 
Magtheridon (EU)
The higher avoidance gets, the bigger the diminishing returns penalty. Reaching the same total avoidance through dodge or parry exclusively is exponentially more "expensive" than reaching it through a combination of the 2 stats. There's really nothing more to say about it. If a druid has 40% dodge and a warrior has 25% dodge and 15% parry, they both have 40% avoidance. If a ring drops with 40 dodge rating, the druid gets less bang for his buck out of it just because he already had too much dodge. And the gap keeps getting bigger and bigger. That would be fine if the druid could invest elsewhere to make up for it, which unfortunately isnt the case.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 3:24 PM   #3585
david0925
Don Flamenco
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Proudmoore
Originally Posted by Neddie View Post
It would mean that we have to wear jewelry, trinkets or necks with defense on them. I think that's a good thing. If we're crit immune from talents and don't value armor, by default our rings, trinkets, necks, etc. will all be DPS gear. For reasons I explained earlier in the thread, I don't think that's a good thing. Tanks should have to wear at least some tanking gear while tanking.
What you're doing here is further pigeon-hole people into using selected numbers of gear. Even with nerf to armor, and immunity from crit, a lot of stats from tanking jewelries are still desired, and avoidance/mitigation trinkets are still vastly better than DPS choices, especially on progression raids.

I would go as far as saying there are NO PROBLEM with druids using full dps gear as full tank gear if that ever becomes the case, because a max-bear role and a max-cat role still has a lot of varying talents involved in them, and you cannot switch spec during a single encounter. However, that is simply still not the case.

On another topic, getting more misses and dodge out of defense is a pretty solid idea, and AP>Armor conversion is also good. Both of these scales us with gear that we will naturally use. Challenge here is knowing how much better or worse we will scale with these stats for the sake of balancing. I will give the developers some faith since they still have 2-3 months to work out the bear overhaul, before Ulduar patch.

Until then, I will still be getting armor trinkets and jewelries, they will still be 5.5x armor for quite a while.

Edit: I still think the easiest approach at this is change the bear multiplier. As long as they are careful about other specs using bear form it will be fine.

Originally Posted by Stejo View Post
The higher avoidance gets, the bigger the diminishing returns penalty. Reaching the same total avoidance through dodge or parry exclusively is exponentially more "expensive" than reaching it through a combination of the 2 stats. There's really nothing more to say about it. If a druid has 40% dodge and a warrior has 25% dodge and 15% parry, they both have 40% avoidance. If a ring drops with 40 dodge rating, the druid gets less bang for his buck out of it just because he already had too much dodge. And the gap keeps getting bigger and bigger. That would be fine if the druid could invest elsewhere to make up for it, which unfortunately isnt the case.
This can be easily remedied by changing the DR formula for each class so that they scale equally well or ultimately reach the same level. Yes, what you said makes sense, but changing it is very easy. Easy example will be allowing bears to start getting DRs on dodge at 60%, while Warriors starts getting DR on dodge at 30% and parry at 30%. This is a very crude example and just for intuitive uses, but hopefully I get the point across.

Last edited by david0925 : 11/06/08 at 3:30 PM.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 3:29 PM   #3586
Neddie
Von Kaiser
 
Human Death Knight
 
Smolderthorn
Originally Posted by slant View Post
The root of the problem is that bears benefit from less stats than other tanks and are asked to share the same off-set items. Previously we could (and did) just stack dodge. With diminishing returns that's markedly less effective.

Ignoring parry and block ratings for now, the solution can be pretty simple. Just give bears more miss and dodge from each point of defense. I suggest 0.10%, two and half times the normal amount, to make the numbers match up.
This is the solution I've been pushing for for a long time. My warrior loves defense. It increases 5 stats that are all useful to me. Even after I become crit immune defense is a great stat because it still increases the chance to be missed, chance to dodge, chance to block, and chance to parry. If I want to focus on threat I'll look for more block value. If I want to increase avoidance I'll look for parry or dodge, but I never worry too much about getting over the crit immune cap because defense continues to be good.

On my druid, I tweaked my gear constantly to make sure I had just enough defense to be crit immune, then started looking for other stats. If I upgraded from a trinket with no defense to one with a lot, I started looking for places where I could take off defense because getting only the dodge / chance-to-be-missed out of defense made it a pretty lousy stat to have a lot of.

If the "chance to be missed" and dodge values of defense were doubled for druids (since they can't take advantage of dodge or block) it might not be the ideal stat to look for, but it wouldn't be something you tried to avoid. DKs should also have defense adjusted slightly to account for their not being able to block.

It would be easy to make defense too good, since dodge, chance-to-be-missed and parry are all much better stats than chance-to-block, but a step in this direction would solve a lot of issues. (Incidentally, I'd push for just double the normal value, perhaps even less, so each point of defense offered 0.6-0.8 dodge / chance-to-be missed for ferals).

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 3:32 PM   #3587
david0925
Don Flamenco
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Proudmoore
Originally Posted by Neddie View Post
This is the solution I've been pushing for for a long time. My warrior loves defense. It increases 5 stats that are all useful to me. Even after I become crit immune defense is a great stat because it still increases the chance to be missed, chance to dodge, chance to block, and chance to parry. If I want to focus on threat I'll look for more block value. If I want to increase avoidance I'll look for parry or dodge, but I never worry too much about getting over the crit immune cap because defense continues to be good.

On my druid, I tweaked my gear constantly to make sure I had just enough defense to be crit immune, then started looking for other stats. If I upgraded from a trinket with no defense to one with a lot, I started looking for places where I could take off defense because getting only the dodge / chance-to-be-missed out of defense made it a pretty lousy stat to have a lot of.

If the "chance to be missed" and dodge values of defense were doubled for druids (since they can't take advantage of dodge or block) it might not be the ideal stat to look for, but it wouldn't be something you tried to avoid. DKs should also have defense adjusted slightly to account for their not being able to block.

It would be easy to make defense too good, since dodge, chance-to-be-missed and parry are all much better stats than chance-to-block, but a step in this direction would solve a lot of issues. (Incidentally, I'd push for just double the normal value, perhaps even less, so each point of defense offered 0.6-0.8 dodge / chance-to-be missed for ferals).
Defense still provides less avoidance than dodge even for a warrior, item point for item point. Just because a stat covers a wide array of other stats doesn't necessarily make it optimal. This can be changed through stat conversion if re-balancing is necessary.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 4:13 PM   #3588
Brute
Von Kaiser
 
Tauren Druid
 
Ner'zhul
Originally Posted by david0925 View Post
Edit: I still think the easiest approach at this is change the bear multiplier. As long as they are careful about other specs using bear form it will be fine.
Agreed. The could also slightly adjust Protector of the Pack upwards too (say to 15%) which would make up more of the shortfall (instead of shunting it all into bearform/thick hide modifiers).

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 4:56 PM   #3589
Astrylian
Rawr
 
Astrylian's Avatar
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Stormrage
Originally Posted by Stejo View Post
The higher avoidance gets, the bigger the diminishing returns penalty. Reaching the same total avoidance through dodge or parry exclusively is exponentially more "expensive" than reaching it through a combination of the 2 stats. There's really nothing more to say about it. If a druid has 40% dodge and a warrior has 25% dodge and 15% parry, they both have 40% avoidance. If a ring drops with 40 dodge rating, the druid gets less bang for his buck out of it just because he already had too much dodge. And the gap keeps getting bigger and bigger. That would be fine if the druid could invest elsewhere to make up for it, which unfortunately isnt the case.
This is not completely true. Look at the effective caps for Dodge and parry for Warrior vs Druid. 116 Dodge for Druids vs 47parry+88dodge for Warriors. It's still 116 vs 135, but also keep in mind that druids get much more avoidance that bypasses DR than the others, which makes up that difference.

Rawr!

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 4:58 PM   #3590
Monedula
Piston Honda
 
Monedula's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Defias Brotherhood (EU)
Hello,

I am new here and tried reading up on the threat but realized it has very outdated posts in em.
2 questions.

The first: Will there be a new threat on feral druids come WotLK. One that has no "lets try this change"-Beta info, one that possibly has good tips on people playing WotLK, like a nice place to get good items while leveling etc.
Possibly it would be a good Idea to make 2 threats. Kitty DPS and bearform tanking. As it is now the feral tree can be specced either for tanking or for dps. Some talents are great if you are a cat in the raid, others are useless and same for tanking. Might be a good idea to split those 2 up. Since imo feral is no longer the feral we are used to.

The second. Is there anyone who has absolutely nothing to do? I used to be resto hardcore raiding and have been casual feral for the last few months. I really need an update on feral and all the new stuff. Not saying I am a complete noob but as to certain things I sure am. If you have nothing to do and are a kind spirit contact me so we could have a small chat about tanking.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 5:35 PM   #3591
 sordee
Priest for Hire
 
sordee's Avatar
 
Tauren Priest
 
Dethecus
Originally Posted by Neddie View Post
It would be easy to make defense too good, since dodge, chance-to-be-missed and parry are all much better stats than chance-to-block, but a step in this direction would solve a lot of issues. (Incidentally, I'd push for just double the normal value, perhaps even less, so each point of defense offered 0.6-0.8 dodge / chance-to-be missed for ferals).
Agreeing with Neddie here. .1% per point would be a little too high (up from .04% base).
1.5x or 2.0x for defense baked into a deep core cat/bear talent (Like HotW) would be more than sufficient for druids to make good use of a +def item. (like the oh so pretty [Signet of the Impregnable Fortress])

1.5x would give us mythical parry lost, while 2.0x would gives us the missing Anti-Crit we don't need. (The other .5X is for block, which our armor will still be able to absorb)

United States Offline
Old 11/06/08, 6:03 PM   #3592
TheNameLessOne
Von Kaiser
 
Tauren Druid
 
Spirestone
Originally Posted by Astrylian View Post
This is not completely true. Look at the effective caps for Dodge and parry for Warrior vs Druid. 116 Dodge for Druids vs 47parry+88dodge for Warriors. It's still 116 vs 135, but also keep in mind that druids get much more avoidance that bypasses DR than the others, which makes up that difference.
You are forgetting that warriors will have a higher miss than druids.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 6:09 PM   #3593
Astrylian
Rawr
 
Astrylian's Avatar
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Stormrage
Originally Posted by TheNameLessOne View Post
You are forgetting that warriors will have a higher miss than druids.
Thanks, but I'm not. That's accounted for.

Rawr!

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 6:19 PM   #3594
TheNameLessOne
Von Kaiser
 
Tauren Druid
 
Spirestone
Originally Posted by Astrylian View Post
Thanks, but I'm not. That's accounted for.
Druids have 10% dodge with talents plus the 5% baseline bonus and some unknown amount of miss (defense skill can be all over the map).
Warriors have 5% parry and 5% dodge with talents plus 5% miss due to defense

Or did I miss something?

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 6:41 PM   #3595
Astrylian
Rawr
 
Astrylian's Avatar
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Stormrage
1.5% higher base dodge. Not insignificant amount of Miss from defense. More dodge from base agi. They have to spend itemization points on that higher miss from defense rating, we don't. Our k value is higher.

Rawr!

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 8:03 PM   #3596
slant
Don Flamenco
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Drenden
Originally Posted by Brute View Post
Agreed. The could also slightly adjust Protector of the Pack upwards too (say to 15%) which would make up more of the shortfall (instead of shunting it all into bearform/thick hide modifiers).
I really wish they wouldn't. I don't want flat mitigation baked into the class, I want to scale with gear like everybody else. Anything less and you end up working great at tier X, falling well behind at X+1, and being essentially useless at X+2, like cat druids in TBC.

The appropriate solution is to make bears want tank cloaks, rings, necklaces, and trinkets as currently itemized.

The obvious alternative is to make standard DPS stats (AP, crit, hit, etc) provide tanking ability (armor, dodge, miss) through yet another bandaid conversion mechanism. That would work too, and the devs have shown no reluctance to do such things in the past, but it's not an elegant solution.

United States Offline
Old 11/06/08, 8:12 PM   #3597
Jone
Piston Honda
 
Jone's Avatar
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Proudmoore
Originally Posted by slant View Post
I really wish they wouldn't. I don't want flat mitigation baked into the class, I want to scale with gear like everybody else. Anything less and you end up working great at tier X, falling well behind at X+1, and being essentially useless at X+2, like cat druids in TBC.
A flat percentage damage reduction scales perfectly: 12% is better on Illidan than Prince, and 12% of damage after armor is 12% whether you have 10k armor or 40k. It's linearly better, not exponentially better the way dodge used to be. Given that Blizzard nerfed dodge because of the unintended high-end effect of exponential scaling, I doubt we will ever see this scaling for anyone's tanking again.

United States Offline
Old 11/06/08, 8:18 PM   #3598
Deathwing
Bald Bull
 
Deathwing's Avatar
 
Orc Warrior
 
Black Dragonflight
Originally Posted by Astrylian View Post
1.5% higher base dodge. Not insignificant amount of Miss from defense. More dodge from base agi. They have to spend itemization points on that higher miss from defense rating, we don't. Our k value is higher.
Higher k value is actually a bad thing. Also, don't forget warriors have 5% base parry.

Offline
Old 11/06/08, 8:40 PM   #3599
kalbear
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Balnazzar
A flat percentage damage reduction scales perfectly
Not exactly. The fear isn't the flat percentage damage or avoidance; the fear is that other tanks will scale more quickly, making them more desirable.

Let's take a hypothetical. I hate these, but it works in this case. Tank A has a base avoidance of 12% and scales at a rate of 20% per tier. Tank B has a base avoidance of 8% and scales at a rate of 24% a tier.

At tier 1, they're equivalent and balanced.
At tier 2, tank B is better by 4%, a minor difference.
At tier 3, tank B is better by 8%. A major difference.

Unless you allow all the tanks to scale with gear similarly, this is going to happen. Is it guaranteed to? No. But that's what the values of diminishing returns combined with having only a couple of stats to scale with imply.

United States Offline
Old 11/06/08, 9:27 PM   #3600
Jone
Piston Honda
 
Jone's Avatar
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Proudmoore
Originally Posted by kalbear View Post
Not exactly. The fear isn't the flat percentage damage or avoidance; the fear is that other tanks will scale more quickly, making them more desirable.
You propose that other tanks' avoidance will scale super-linearly due to a varied stat allocation, while we only scale linearly because of a more limited selection of defensive stats. This is a reasonable fear, and nothing I disagree with -- for example, unholy DKs are predicted to come to a point in gear scaling where they become massively higher mitigation than other DKs specs. If you linked PotP to a gear stat (preferably one favored on rogue gear), we would have our own super-linear scaling to match; I agree it could very well be beneficial and give us some interesting rock-paper-scissors games to play with gear.

I hope we can stay clear though: if PotP is intended to scale linearly, it does so perfectly, being more useful at reducing damage as content becomes more difficult, and providing the same linear benefit at each level of gear. It shares this in common with defensive stance and imp RF. Suggestions that only druids' linear damage reduction be modified by gear to be super-linear are suggestions for a new mechanic in game, not pointing out a flaw in the existing mechanic. Given that other tanks are likely to scale better with avoidance than we are, I suspect any alterations we get will be more along the lines of improving our avoidance scaling per stat than the introduction of a whole new axis along which we can scale.

United States Offline
Closed Thread

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Druids

Thread Tools