|
Resto (PvE) Healing Discussion
Due to several requests for a thread on this topic and the general clutter of the Itemization and Glyph thread we now have a new one to use which should keep the others from getting worse.
Things this thread is for:
Things this thread is not for:
I'm sure both lists could be expanded but hopefully common sense will prevail and it wont be needed. At some point hopefully a FAQ thread can be made (and locked) in order to cover the basic questions that seem to crop up all the time (ie: Haste and GoTEM) for people to glance at before asking the same old questions. Enjoy and remember to keep things civil and constructive :) |
I am partly guilty of derailing the resto glyph thread with what is essentially a spell/build discussion, so I thought I would try to start it here. At this point, I just wanted to throw out a few questions/thoughts:
(1) A fully talented healing touch is a good spell -- it is both highest HPS and highest HPM direct healing spell resto druids have. It is, however, slow (greater heal speed). Druids do have Nature's Grace coupled with Improved Regrowth, which can reliably shave 0.5 seconds off Healing Touch in the same way paladins shave 0.5 seconds off Holy Light. It seems like there's a lot of potential here. The problem is, fully powering up Healing Touch requires 12 talents points, on top of the standard Balance talent Moonglow that everyone takes (Tranquil Spirit, Naturalist, and Empowered Touch). It is unclear where these points should come from. There are two candidates: Living Seed and Gift of the Earthmother. This leads to: (2) What exactly is the value of Living Seed? One way to evaluate Living Seed is to just look at its healing % on the meters. I believe it is currently 1-3% depending on the fight. However, it seems to me the true value of this spell is increasing burst healing from Regrowth (since druids don't gear for crit, and most of their spells don't crit, statistically the vast majority of Living Seeds will come from Regrowth casts). What's a good methodology for evaluating this talent? |
Living Seed is a talent where i still ponder what exact value it offers. The given healing percentage seems to be correct, a naxx clear usually shows 2-3%. From my personal point of view i would judge it as a somewhat to weak reward for the invested points. I do see the point, the devs where trying to make here, i.e. giving druids a shieldlike ability without really providing control, which means, it doesn't really compare to Earthshield or PW:S. The main problem, which devalues the idea somewhat, is the old druid problem: a lot of our spells can't crit, and so cannot trigger Living Seed. The spells which are supposed to trigger this mechanic more often than not usually only provide an average Seed value (Regrowth Crits, mainly).
In its actual incarnation i do like to include Living Seed in my build, just because it works toward even more smoothing the incoming damage on a tank with being a reactive, instant heal. But it still is looked upon by me as a very weak talent which i would most likely replace, if there were a more appealing choice. Which Nature's Grace just is not in it's current state, because it only supports a somewhat lazy or nonflexible style of play (that means, trigger it with a Regrowth or hoping for a trigger during HT spam just seems to contradict druidic healing). |
For evaluation purposes, I'd view Living Seed as mechanically "increases the amount healed when you crit by 30%" which, despite what the tooltip says about multiple spells, is primarily a Regrowth boost (as is Nature's Grace), the way Empowered Touch is a HT boost. That it works with other spells critting is just an afterthought in comparison. You probably could translate that into "increases the amount healed by Regrowth's initial heal by 30%, most of the time".
Yes, the seed mechanic itself won't save a tank if the next hit were to be fatal (this is directly after Regrowth lands, so it's gotta be a pretty hefty smack), and can be 'stored' for the next hit if the target is at full HP, so it's somewhat different from a straight 30% increase, but for pure throughput scenarios, it's almost identical. The only catch is that boosting Regrowth to spam it on a single target is a waste of the HoT component compared to boosting HT to spam that. |
Nourish vs. Regrowth
I've been trying to figure out which I should primarily use as my "big heal" and before 80 it was primarily Regrowth. I liked it because I was gaining a decent amount of haste, had glyphed for 20% Regrowth bonus, talented for Improved Regrowth (yay crit)/Living Seed/Natures Grace. At first this seemed win:win to me. But as I've hit 80 and gained Nourish I have been skeptical to give it a shot and really dig into it within encounters. I recently downloaded Recount and really want to do some tests but what do you guys/gals work with mostly? I know both have their place but I want efficiency and at this point am curious what you guys think.
Much appreciated. -Luradanen | Kael'Thas |
Quote:
Question on Add-ons: I have been using DoTTimer to track HoTs, but WG spams it and will push tank HoTs down out of my immediate field of vision (thus making it harder to track). Is there anyway to take WG off of the DoTTimer? Or, alternatively, I have been told that Grid can display almost all the pertinent information needed about my HoTs, but I have not been able to find a way to convey all the information (how long is left, how many stacks do I have up, etc.). |
Quote:
Direct Healing In Wrath' post (second one at the time of this posting), you will find some math that answers your question pretty conclusively. At the time of this posting Nourish is rather expensive and ineffective until you gain the 4pc T7 bonus when it becomes very viable. If the recent posting from Ghostcrawler that Nourish may also be affected by Wild Growth HoTs goes live this would seem to make Nourish that much more viable as a big heal. Until that happens stick with Regrowth or go the glyphed HT route. |
Quote:
I prefer to wait on the OP's permission to post my UI here since he said it's not the good place to do so. Altho, if you want more information, I guess we can use PM, just let me know. |
Question on Lifebloom:
Currently I am in a regrowth-centric build, stacking regrowth, lifebloom one-stack, rejuvenation and sometimes wild growth. Is it better to let lifebloom only stack once and run out, or try to keep it at a 3 stack? the direct heal portion of lifebloom has gotten a huge buff recently, and it might be better to simply let it run out. Talents that increase the lifespan of bloom must also be taken into account. Between Nature's Splendor and the lifebloom glyph, it could be a 9 second 3 stack lifebloom is less HPS then a 6 second 1 stack lifebloom. |
Taking some figures from my lifebloom last raids it seems to tick for 470 and bloom for 3600 (thats actually higher then the parses show on the bloom and lower on the tick). That means it takes 4s for those two extra stacks to beat the bloom (3760 healing done) plus you then get another 3 seconds (it's 7s pre talent/glyph) for an additional 2820 healing (in reality it is 4700 extra since everyone takes splendor). So no, not in any case (other then Loatheb) is it benificial to let lifebloom expire instead of rolling a 3 stack.
It seems alot of druids have stopped rolling lifebloom on the tank just because it got nerfed and that's just stupid. A 1200/s hot (should be around there at 2400sp which is what most have) sure is less of the total tanks health compared to TBC but it's not anywhere near the realm of useless. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As a general rule stacking lifebloom on the tank is never a bad idea. How much you actually gain compared to how much some other action might give you varies from encounter to encounter, though. Lifebloom serves a few functions in healing: firstly it might provide a sort of buffer against spike damage (albeit very small) but more importantly it allows other healers not to worry about keeping tanks 100% topped off. In some cases (particularly for offtanks) lifebloom can give them a lot of room to maneuvre in.
If MT is at 90% then a paladin might need to use FoL to top him up but with druid hots (lifebloom+rejuvenation) he can just concentrate on doing his holy lights and need not "risk" the FoL (or he can afford to try & get more value out of his beacon without risking tank death). |
Quote:
Second question : I use a mix of both, depending of what the situation is. Sapphiron like damage, rejuvenation is pretty good to counter the frost damage. For small unknown damage, lifebloom may be enough, for Loatheb, lifebloom last tick is very good. I guess I just go by extinct, on melee I would say I prefer rejuvenation tho, to use swiftmend and save their arse from a cleave, WW or aggro. |
I'm not sure if I'm "doing it right" but I find regrowth to be my spell of choice in too many situations. It's fast, it's hefty, it's not horribly inefficient, it procs living seed, and it procs nature's grace. My "heal plan" is Wild Growth where applicable, Lifebloom on tanks and targets taking steady damage and targets that I anticipate will take damage soon, and Regrowth for most everything else. I don't find myself using healing touch due to the speed and I don't find myself using Nourish because...well Regrowth pre-empts Nourish in almost all situations it'd be useful. Am I missing something or is this actually how I should be healing?
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 2:25 AM. |
Forum Infrastructure by vBulletin 3.6.12 ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.