Originally Posted by mesh7
Who's correct Toskk/Rawr or Nightcrowler's method?
|
This is theorycrafting. If that were an easy answer, everyone would already be agreeing. The main issue is that calculators try to guess what your cycles will look like
averaged over time. However, they will only be accurate if you are performing your cycles exactly like the calculator describes. So, it depends on your cycle and I can guarantee that none of them match exactly what occurs in game.
If the FBN addon follows the
exact same rules that his simulator does AND you are following the addon with
zero errors, his results should be valid. Otherwise, they won't be a perfect match and your real stat values will vary.
Nightcrawler - I really think you should post the explanation of stat importance you gave
here on the main post. It could really help to clear up the questions people might have as to why one stat might be better than another. I've always tried to explain the difference in value between Str and Agi in the past (when they were nearly equal), and it seems that basically ArP has just replaced Str now.