Originally Posted by baklava
I believe this is a wrong information. Nowadays SV is as best as MM for AOE. The main reason is that SV can crit more than MM hunters
WoW Meter Online - Combatlog Replay
This link shows how much volley can critically hit (up to 4500) and how much crit with Volley (66%) with a good geared hunter.
If we take a MM as example;
WoW Meter Online - Combatlog Replay
The crit rate drops to 63% and with max 4.4k crit damage.
They are very close, but SV seems a little better.
|
SV may or not be better Volley AoE than MMs, but your example does not really provide real evidence of it. Just taking the results of two player's fights and drawing conclusions is fraught for several reasons:
- RNG: Its not enough of a sample to provide definitive results.
- Average Damage: Despite the low crit rate, the MM hunter in your example still had higher average Volley damage (2841 to 2653) than the SV hunter. In addition, the MM had higher lowest damage too (1127 to 987).
- Different raids, different buffs: It is not a fair comparison. For instance, the raid for the SV hunter listed had a Feral Druid providing the +5% crit always while the MM hunter did not and only had 95% uptime of Rampage.
- Different Gear: Although their gear is comparable, its hard to compare when they are not exactly the same. One of the factors is that although the range weapons for both hunters had the same DPS, the SV hunter's was the slower of the two weapons, with a higher max and lower min damage. Hence, if everything else was equal, he was likely to have the high max crit as well as the lowest min non-crit, which leads to once again average damage is what is important.
Hence, with the examples you provided, my conclusion would be that MM does better Volley damage than SV, but that wouldn't be an accurate conclusion either per the reasons listed above.