Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Class Mechanics » Mages

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09/27/10, 12:23 PM   #61
Fröstler
Glass Joe
 
Undead Mage
 
Wrathbringer (EU)
Since the latest Early Frost change, this talent becomes a problem in PVE with many haste.
Also, as Lhivera stated, this talent depends on haste and becomes weaker with more haste.
Originally Posted by Lhivera View Post
Early Frost: < 1% DPS @ 2 talent points
Question: What happens if we can make this talent or maybe the tree haste independet?
Idea: Add a talent that converts haste direct into damage (1% haste = 1% damage). Instead of the cast time reduction the spell damage will be increased.

This results in:
Early frost has then a stable DPS. PvP can use this talent as R1 FB and PVE has no problem with haste.
Does not influence PvP (same DPS).
Mana efficieny is better.
Latency effect is smaller.
Frost does not have a haste cap.

Offline
Old 09/27/10, 1:43 PM   #62
Gilthanor
Von Kaiser
 
Blood Elf Mage
 
Boulderfist
Originally Posted by Fröstler View Post
Since the latest Early Frost change, this talent becomes a problem in PVE with many haste.
Also, as Lhivera stated, this talent depends on haste and becomes weaker with more haste.


Question: What happens if we can make this talent or maybe the tree haste independet?
Idea: Add a talent that converts haste direct into damage (1% haste = 1% damage). Instead of the cast time reduction the spell damage will be increased.

This results in:
Early frost has then a stable DPS. PvP can use this talent as R1 FB and PVE has no problem with haste.
Does not influence PvP (same DPS).
Mana efficieny is better.
Latency effect is smaller.
Frost does not have a haste cap.
Are you proposing that frost be given a talent that converts an entire stat into another stat just to make another talent less clumsy in pve? When it comes to things like early frost and ring of frost, I'm perfectly fine if neither are ideal for pve, as long as they have a use in the pvp part of the game. There are plenty of great frost talents, and I like having several points to subspec.

Speaking for myself only, I think some of the concern about ring of frost is due to the fact that it doesn't really add to AoE for any spec. I like the cooldown, duration, and functionionality for battlegrounds, but when "wall of fog" was first announced I was hoping for a significant damaging AoE reminiscent of the wall of fire spells from diablo and other spells. A linear consecration, if you will.

Offline
Old 09/27/10, 2:05 PM   #63
Pasture
Don Flamenco
 
Pasture's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Mage
 
Steamwheedle Cartel (EU)
Originally Posted by Gilthanor View Post
Are you proposing that frost be given a talent that converts an entire stat into another stat just to make another talent less clumsy in pve? When it comes to things like early frost and ring of frost, I'm perfectly fine if neither are ideal for pve, as long as they have a use in the pvp part of the game. There are plenty of great frost talents, and I like having several points to subspec.
This.

I don't understand the endless pages of fuss over Early Frost. The other trees have similar talents at the top of their trees that have little or no use in a PvE environment. Improved Counterspell in Arcane is obviously a PvP talent. Arcane mages won't spec it. Likewise, Frost mages need not spec Early Frost on the same basis, especially if it creates GCD issues and is next to no dps.

That said, as a PvP ability, if it is intended to replace downranking, I don't see why it can't be an 'on use' trick rather than automatic.

Offline
Old 09/27/10, 8:09 PM   #64
Tyrea
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Mage
 
Shattered Hand
There are three main things I am worried about with frost: diminishing returns, damage break on freezes and aggro switch on freezes. Mastery leans on targets being frozen. We have fingers of frost for single targets but in an aoe situation there is no way to keep targets frozen even for a full gcd. Even improved CoC breaks on damage which was surprising. Even if the current freezes did not break on damage they would be discouraged because of of possible aggro loss by the tank. Frost aoe would be much more dynamic if you had to balance freeze status with blizzard casts by using CoC, frost nova and freeze.

Deep freeze becomes pretty worthless on stunnable mobs especially if there is more than one frost mage in the group due to diminishing returns. I don't have numbers but I have noticed my dps rise significantly when I work deep freeze into my rotation even on stunnable targets so I don't think this is an issue blizz should shrug off. Even if they tune other ablities to compensate it removes an interesting part the frost rotation when fighting stunnable mobs. Also I have not run into this in a long time (might be fixed) but I have gotten immune messages on stun-proof mobs when using deep freeze, in a group with another frost mage. (and using cold snap for 2 DFs in a row). I believe this is due to a bug when diminishing returns are still applied to deep freeze even when it is not stunning the target and eventually that target becomes "immune" to that ability.

Offline
Old 09/28/10, 7:53 AM   #65
vukae
Von Kaiser
 
Human Mage
 
Defias Brotherhood (EU)
Originally Posted by Pasture View Post
That said, as a PvP ability, if it is intended to replace downranking, I don't see why it can't be an 'on use' trick rather than automatic.
I agree. It would have a greater utility in levelling as well (as a first rank talent you can get it pretty early), where you generally don't care how long your opener takes to cast but being able to drop a quick snare on a second mob for example is immensely valuable. In fact I guess for some encounters (say where add control is required) a controllable early frost might even find a place in endgame PVE builds.

Great Britain Offline
Old 09/28/10, 9:01 AM   #66
Endario
Glass Joe
 
Endario's Avatar
 
Gnome Mage
 
Proudmoore
Originally Posted by Tyrea View Post
We have fingers of frost for single targets but in an aoe situation there is no way to keep targets frozen even for a full gcd.
Technically speaking, Squirtle's Freeze does not require a GCD from you and is your most effective method of freezing targets for AoE.

Originally Posted by Tyrea View Post
Even if the current freezes did not break on damage they would be discouraged because of of possible aggro loss by the tank.
There's also the high possibility of a rooted mob turning around and smacking the Rogue (or the warlock pet, but we meant to do that).

I'm assuming Blizzard is going to be balanced primarily around hitting targets that are not frozen. If it falls behind, they can probably bump up the damage safely or add the spell to Fingers of Frost. I'd rather save my freezes for actual control than for boosting the damage of AoE to acceptable levels.

Originally Posted by Tyrea View Post
Deep freeze becomes pretty worthless on stunnable mobs especially if there is more than one frost mage in the group due to diminishing returns.
This has been said elsewhere a number of times, but it bares repeating: stunning mobs isn't a bad thing. If a mob is stunnable, then Blizzard intended for tossing a stun at it to be profitable in some sense. Sure, you're not going to get your 50k Deep Freeze crit in, but that's 5 seconds where the mob isn't smacking the tank while enraged, casting a big heal or lobbing a fireball at the Shaman.

Take the Valithiria encounter for example. The Archmages can be stunned and you want them to be stunned. Deep Freeze can lock them down from casting their Volley. The Blazing Skellies can't be stunned but you want to burn down immediately. Honestly, I've gone through all of ICC as Frost and the only time I wanted Deep Freeze to do damage and it didn't was on the Frost Tombs in Sindragosa (this was more a problem with the mob than the spell though.. as it was unstunnable but not technically "immune").

All that aside: it's trash. Don't worry about it.

Originally Posted by Tyrea View Post
Also I have not run into this in a long time (might be fixed) but I have gotten immune messages on stun-proof mobs when using deep freeze, in a group with another frost mage.
This isn't a problem with there being another Frost Mage: this is a problem with Deep Freeze since its inception as a damage attack. The "Immune" message will pop up every time you use it and it does damage. The "Immune" message is for the stun (the damage still happens). There is no diminishing returns for the damage portion of Deep Freeze. Yes, it is annoying. Yes, I want it gone. No, it is not more important than getting a giant icey explosion particle effect when Deep Freeze does damage *crosses fingers*.

Offline
Old 09/28/10, 10:26 AM   #67
Adyssa
Von Kaiser
 
Night Elf Hunter
 
Dalvengyr
Originally Posted by Tyrea View Post
Deep freeze becomes pretty worthless on stunnable mobs especially if there is more than one frost mage in the group due to diminishing returns. I don't have numbers but I have noticed my dps rise significantly when I work deep freeze into my rotation even on stunnable targets so I don't think this is an issue blizz should shrug off. Even if they tune other ablities to compensate it removes an interesting part the frost rotation when fighting stunnable mobs.
If what you say is true and your DPS goes up, then so long as you don't both cast Deep Freeze simultaneously, reaching the diminishing return limit should mean your DPS increased further, because that means there was more Deep Freeze uptime than you could possibly have done alone. Especially true because you can keep pumping Frostbolts into the target during the other mage's Deep Freeze.

Offline
Old 09/28/10, 6:31 PM   #68
Tyrea
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Mage
 
Shattered Hand
I'm not complaining about deep freeze not doing damage on stunnable mobs. You gain dps from the 5 seconds of freeze status which from my experience is worth the gcd (no numbers to support this though). What I am complaining about is the lost dps due to diminishing returns on stuns. Depending on how many other players are stunning a mob my deep freeze may last on 1-3 sec or be immune altogether.

As for aoe; sure Blizzard could tune blizzard to match other class/spec's dps but then the casting dynamic becomes flat and boring. It seems from the new mechanics that their intention is for mobs to be frozen during an aoe rotation. If this is the case they need to at least fix the "break on damage" mechanic for at least some of the freeze spells as now they vanish almost immediately.

Offline
Old 09/28/10, 8:38 PM   #69
Elimbras
Don Flamenco
 
Dwarf Priest
 
Eitrigg (EU)
Most specs have boring and dull aoes.
Hunters / rogues / warlocks / kitties spam the same spell over and over again (kitties sometime try to maintain Savage Roar up, but that really depends on the encounter).
Paladins / warriors have (nearly) the same rotation for aoe and single target damage.
Priest usely spam the same spell, sometimes also multidot.
I don't know for shamans, nor for DK or boomkin.

The only interesting aoe I know about is cataclysm fire aoe, which uses several spells and interactions. And that's clearly the exception, not frost.

Offline
Old 09/29/10, 5:07 AM   #70
Light4
Piston Honda
 
Gnome Mage
 
Antonidas (EU)
I have been playing some bosses in ICC as frost lately (just for some new experience) and I wonder if some of you noticed that you can DF stun-immune bosses without actually doing damage. This happens because DF does not need a LoS to be executed, however, it requires a LoS to do damage. Can someone verify, if this behaviour is still the same on the Beta-Server?

Offline
Old 10/01/10, 11:14 AM   #71
Tyrian
Bald Bull
 
Tyrian's Avatar
 
Human Mage
 
Frostmourne
Some pretty interesting changes to Ring of Frost lately:

- Animation improved: YouTube - RING of Frost
- RoF in action: YouTube - Ring of Frost Mob Effect
- 2 minute cooldown
- Ring of Frost targets treated as Frozen
- Ring of Frost targets interact with Shatter and Frostburn
- Freeze effect now breaks after moderate damage, not after any damage like the previous builds.

These are certainly sweeping improvements. The graphic now looks complete, and has come such a long way from that embarassing line on the ground it used to be. The shorter cooldown feels more appropriate, striking a better balance between 'use liberally' and 'save only for emergencies'.

(Edit - Some of this paragraph is inaccurate. Mobs appear to break on damage, dummies do not). The most interesting change however, is that PVE mobs will get stuck in the freeze and damage won't break them out. With a 2 minute cooldown usable every couple trash packs, this is pretty powerful. A Frost Mage could even Cold Snap + Ring of Frost Freeze mobs for 24 seconds.

I'm now in two minds about the 'ROF needs a more compelling use in PvE, outside of gimmick/situational uses' argument - because its current incarnation is damn strong, and with a 2 minute cooldown, one could easily overlook other shortcomings.

I feel the base spell is pretty much complete. All that's needed now is a couple Glyphs which allow players to tweak RoF slightly - according to their personal preferences. For example, a PvP Glyph which reduced the 3 second coalescence time to 1 or 2 seconds. Or maybe a PvE Glyph which removed the Freeze effect, and instead allowed the spell to do damage to mobs on contact (for raid bosses). But the base spell itself is pretty impressive now.

We also need to compile a list of abilities which can negate Ring of Frost, such as Heroic Leap or Demonic Portal.

Last edited by Tyrian : 10/01/10 at 12:52 PM.

Australia Online
Old 10/01/10, 12:23 PM   #72
Taelons
Glass Joe
 
Human Mage
 
Bloodhoof (EU)
As most of you know I made a list of most of the abilities classes can use to avoid RoF. The post is located here
Because of time I won't be retesting them all of them again with the new patch 13117.

- Freeze effect on PvE mobs does not break with any damage. Breaks after 20-30k damage in PvP.
Have you tested this yourself? I havn't tested this enough yet, but it seemed that RoF breaks at 5-10k and frostnova, hex at 20-30k. Mind you this is a very rough test.

I feel the base spell is pretty much complete. All that's needed now is a couple Glyphs which allow players to tweak RoF slightly - according to their personal preferences. For example, a PvP Glyph which reduced the 3 second coalescence time to 1 or 2 seconds. Or maybe a PvE Glyph which removed the Freeze effect, and instead allowed the spell to do damage to mobs on contact (for raid bosses). But the base spell itself is pretty impressive now.
I agree with you that the spell is pretty much complete. I do believe blizzard doesn't want to implement glyphs for any of the new spells introduced in Cataclysm. Ofcourse there can be exceptions but I don't expect a glyph that reduces the Coalescent effect from 3 to 2 seconds. If they would make a glyph for the spell I'd see it in a form that allows RoF to be used in certain Arena teams (like polymorph glyph did) or make it do damage if the target is immune in pve. I do however think it's not needed for it to deal deal damage in raids, unless all trash and AoE encounters are immune to the Iced effect.

Offline
Old 10/01/10, 12:45 PM   #73
Tyrian
Bald Bull
 
Tyrian's Avatar
 
Human Mage
 
Frostmourne
It appears that ROF functions differently on dummies to normal PVE mobs. I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard decided not to implement new Glyphs for Cata spells, as you said, But I think the best way to approach a PvE focused RoF Glyph would be to give it an additional effect when cast around the Mage. Something such as, "When standing within your own Ring of Frost, X happens".

Given other classes' utility abilities such as Smoke Bomb, it's hard to imagine Blizzard wouldn't go out of their way a little to design encounters which let these abilities shine.

Last edited by Tyrian : 10/01/10 at 12:50 PM.

Australia Online
Old 10/02/10, 5:17 AM   #74
Taelons
Glass Joe
 
Human Mage
 
Bloodhoof (EU)
I'm having a hard time figuring out the damage breaking point on frostnova and RoF. I don't believe there is adifference in it between pve and pvp.

I expect it to be working either in the following way:
- the Breaking point is based on the maximum health of the mob
- After a certain amount have damage has been dealt, the chance of breaking it earlier is increased.

or

- the breaking point is based on the level of the mob
- After a certain amount have damage has been dealt, the chance of breaking it earlier is increased.



While testing I was sometimes able to put out 3noncrit Icelances (as firespec) and sometimes 4. The higher lvl mob I sought out the higher the chances of getting extra Ice Lances of. On the lvl 85 mob I was even able to get 5 Ice Lances which was about the same duration as the Frostnova itself. These 5 Ice Lances happened quite often. RoF breaking point is definitely lower than frostnova.

MY Icelances did about 3700-4000 damage. During my tests I got the feeling Flame Orb doesn't break any of the effects while doing damage, not sure.

Offline
Old 10/03/10, 10:29 AM   #75
Zeldyrr
Piston Honda
 
Human Mage
 
Garona
I would like to start to morph this thread from "how is it looking in beta" mode to to "how is frost behaving on live" mode as patches 4.0.1 and 4.03 are released. I've updated the original post to include a section on the three new mages spells and how they interact with frost talents.

I would also like to add sections on coefficients (as they stabilize) and suggested talent builds, with required and optional points. If people could reply here with such information I will check for accuracy/consistency and summarize in the original post.

Offline
Closed Thread

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Class Mechanics » Mages

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fire Cataclysm Discussion: OP Updated for Release Tyrian Mages 710 12/06/10 2:27 PM
[WOTLK 4.0] Restoration Discussion Carebare Druids 832 12/04/10 11:34 PM
Arcane Design Tyrian Mages 311 11/27/10 10:09 PM
The DK Cataclysm changes discussion thread Khaosknight Death Knights 9 08/22/09 4:02 AM