Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Urban Rivals
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > Class Mechanics > Mages
Elitist Jerks Login

gamerDNA Login

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
We're testing some new features on the site regarding OpenID registration and coordination with gamerDNA. If you experience any issues with registering an account, please take the time to fill out a report and send it to this e-mail address. We would appreciate any assistance you could provide in making sure everything is functioning as intended. Thanks!

If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack (132) Thread Tools
Old 10/30/09, 7:58 AM   #901
Blatty
Glass Joe
 
Troll Mage
 
Ysondre (EU)
I have a question concerning Firestorm Band - Item - World of Warcraft
and Polished Dragonslayer's Signet - Item - World of Warcraft

How is it possible that, for an arcane mage, Rawr rates Polished Dragonslayer's Signet - Item - World of Warcraft as the better one, dps wise?

I mean isn't 19 SP supposedly better than 1%ish crit for arcane?
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 10/30/09, 12:53 PM   #902
Wizeowel
old and slow
 
Wizeowel's Avatar
 
Human Mage
 
Nordrassil (EU)
Originally Posted by Blatty View Post
I have a question concerning Firestorm Band - Item - World of Warcraft and Polished Dragonslayer's Signet - Item - World of Warcraft

How is it possible that, for an arcane mage, Rawr rates Polished Dragonslayer's Signet - Item - World of Warcraft as the better one, dps wise? I mean isn't 19 SP supposedly better than 1%ish crit for arcane?
You are talking about 51 crit rating versus 19 spellpower. Even if crit rating were only half as effective as spellpower (which it's not, it's about 60%) it would still be better. However, you seem to have ignored the 56 hit rating on the Firestorm Band. Rawr does not ignore hit rating, but values it dependent on the gear you have selected for your character. So when you are undercapped, Rawr correctly rates Firestorm Band about 155 dps higher than Dragonslayer's Signet. When you are hit capped, Rawr correctly rates the latter higher. Try turning off misery in the buffs section to see the difference, or remove another hit gear piece from your character.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 11/03/09, 5:02 PM   #903
hkkilian
Glass Joe
 
Gnome Mage
 
Terenas (EU)
Possible bug?

I'm seeing something that I don't understand.
With my current setup, Rawr says my DPS is 6020.208. I have enough emblems to buy the Talisman of Resurgence trinket, and when I tell Rawr that that's available and hit optimize (with maximum thoroughness) it tells me to re-gem some stuff and then I'll get 6123.9 DPS.
But if I simply replace my Sundial trinket with Talisman of Resurgence, it says I get 6135.76.

I don't understand why the optimizer doesn't find the 6135.76 solution.

I've uploaded my xml file here: RapidShare: 1-CLICK Web hosting - Easy Filehosting
Since it can only be downloaded 10 times, I'd appreciate it if you only download it if you *really* want to see it

This is with Rawr 2.2.24, btw...
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 11/03/09, 5:55 PM   #904
Kavan
King Hippo
 
Gnome Mage
 
Kilrogg
Originally Posted by hkkilian View Post
I don't understand why the optimizer doesn't find the 6135.76 solution.
Short story, it does find that solution. It actually finds a better solution. If you had accepted the optimization result you'd see that the actual dps of the solution it finds is 6136.44 dps.

Now the long story. Why does it say it's only 6123.9 dps when it actually is 6136.44 dps? The reason comes from Incremental Optimizations. What Incremental Optimization does is it assumes that when you're making small changes to gear your optimal cycles won't change. By making this assumption it's able to compute gear comparisons a lot faster. It only computes the true optimum for the character that is loaded and makes comparisons/optimizations based on that. It does have a problem though that when you're on a boundary where your optimal cycles change it'll underreport the value. In your particular case you're right on a boundary between 2 arcane cycles since you're low on mana regen.

What can you do about it? If you want to have 100% accurate comparisons/optimizations then you should disable Incremental Optimization. The other more practical solution is to take into account that even though it is underreporting values it's doing so uniformly for all comparisons, so in almost all cases it'll still correctly rate which gear combination is best. And once you load in the new gear it'll give you the correct dps and further comparisons/optimizations will go based on this starting point.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > Class Mechanics > Mages

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rawr (v2.2.27 released on 11/9) Astrylian Class Mechanics 2537 11/16/09 11:55 AM
Rawr Healadin Model Endoscient Paladins 252 10/08/09 8:45 PM
Is RAWR the be all end all ? Blackwater The Dung Heap 4 07/15/08 5:59 PM
[Mage] Rawr Spec Shootout MyrddinE Class Mechanics 18 06/11/08 7:25 PM