Another thing to know when looking at gem charts is that that shows the value of adding one gem in addition to all your gear, not replacing another gem. So it is not exactly the same thing as the gear comparison charts show. In most cases this distinction is not important, but if you're close to a step in haste value (which you can check in stats graph) it might be different.

All people should keep in mind that using to much haste will bring you near to the gcd.
I think in most cases where the difference is nearly null you should go for spellpower.
If you use this calculator Spellhastecap Calculator you can see how far away you are from the cap.

Indeed some people say, that you have to use potions or icy veins not in bloodlust, but in some fights you have only a small timerange where you couldn't use icy veins and bloodlust in a series.
And there is still the lag problem. If you have very short casttime (nearyl 1sec) the lag factor becomes bigger.
At last there are fights where the enrage phase is a phase where some pc systems become very busy and cause more lag.

Hey guy´s I just got some gear but because of it I got under the hitcap. Now I reggemed and I runned my character through rawr and now it wants me to get rid of the gems I just put in to increase my hit rating.

Is it cause rawr doesn´t look at the hit cap or is it something I'm missing?

Edit: Now I'm looking at it again and in Rawr my hit rating is over the hitcap but in game it isn't, I desellected all buffs anyone know what's wrong?

Rawr takes chance to hit from Talents into account, whereas the ingame Character window does not - it only shows the chance to hit you gain from hit rating.

So Rawr is right, you are in fact overcapped.

Just downloaded RAWR 2.39. It still says [Dislodged Foreign Object]normal AND heroic are BiS.

Is it still using the assumption that the procs from normal and heroic DFO are independent of each other?
I know paragon (and others) have killed heroic 25 rotface - has anyone got both DFO to see how the procs work/stack?

Will be interesting to see if both DFO are BiS if the procs do not stack, and whether heroic DFO and reign of unliving are better.

Can anyone confirm?

You can't equip the normal and heroic versions together. Rawr must not register that.

Kavan this morning implemented an update that checked if similar named items (such as the Ashen Brand rings, or the trinkets in ICC) is equipped, it will not show up in the list of available items. This also effects ToC trinkets so at this point we would have to manually edit the item so that we can see the ToC trinket. As an example, a trinket such as the [Reign of the Dead] would not appear in the list if you have [Reign of the Dead] equipped. You would have to edit [Reign of the Dead]'s information so that you can see it in the list.

Ok, I was confused by the wording you used for the Patch. The way it was put was that it was only working for ICC trinkets and we would have to edit the ToC trinkets.

What that was supposed to mean is that if there are some other items that you want to be treated as unique you can add that yourself.

Rawr is telling me that
Profiler - Wowhead - With Nibelung (10308 in magegraf)
is 200 dps better than
Profiler - Wowhead - With Barb + Offhand (10543 in magegraf)

This seem right to anyone? I'd love for it to be true but every setup I've tried with the staff has come up short in actual raids so far.

From my raiding logs, Val'kyr damage is always significantly ahead of what Rawr reports it to be. Rawr says the damage percent is 3-4% for a 5 minute fight under most circumstances, but it ends up proccing a lot more than that, consistently. The actual damage percentage that I see is along 6-8%. Most likely this is because of what can trigger a Val'kyr proc. Nibelung procs off of spell casts: IE, casting Living Bomb on a target, or Molten Armor's damage (which is a spell cast). Furthermore, the actual damage that Rawr reports for the player is always going to be higher in Rawr than it is in the game. Suffice it to say, Rawr operates under an optimal playing style, and unless you are some kind of godly machine, you aren't going to be hitting the DPS Rawr says you will. With that in mind, your damage will go down, but more than likely, the number of Val'kyr procs won't -- which simply means that Val'kyr damage ends up being a larger percent of total damage than Rawr expects.

I don't think Nibelung could be modeled better in Rawr, because it's entirely dependent on odd casting situations (IE, applying Living Bomb to multiple targets in a row means you're casting, say, 8 spells in 10 seconds versus 4), and Rawr assumes a single target fight.

My last 25-man Deathbringer Saurfang fight was 4:49 (289 seconds, with 284 sec of DPS time), and Val'kyr damage accounted for 10% of my total damage. I can't play perfectly -- Rawr says my DPS should have been 9316 for that time, with 3.72% of my damage coming from Val'kyrs. My actual DPS was 7391 though. It's hard then to really get an accurate depiction of Nibelung in Rawr. Sometimes it appears accurate as well: on a 3:48 Marrowgar fight, Rawr lists it as 3.77% of my damage. Actual in game was 4.0%. What Rawr doesn't see is that I had a number of Val'kyrs die in the fire (despite their very impressive healing). So actual proc rate is still higher.

I wouldn't run with this knowledge and assume that Nibelung is better than other weapons that Rawr lists as being ahead of it though. I wouldn't use it over [item]51799[/i], for instance, even though that staff is 6 ilevels lower.