Spells proccing SoJ are :
White strikes
Crusader Strike
Hammer of the righteous
Templar's Verdict

Spells NOT proccing SoJ :
Judgment
Hammer of Wrath
Divine Storm
Exorcism

Both debuffs can be maintained on the same target, it is not a "one or the other" situation. As for the crit part, I tend to assume it will be more like our hand of light mastery but I have yet to test it on the new build to confirm.

The specifics on the legendary metagem in 5.2 have been released: PTR Class and Set Bonus Issues, Part II - Forums - World of Warcraft

Concerning ret:

Which means the gem has a procrate of 15x1.923 = 28.845RPPM. It should be firing roughly once every 2 seconds, increased by haste, for a Lightning Strike every ~10s.

I'll leave the full math to those better suited, but I'm guessing this will work out nicely. Here's the full set of coefficients:

Of interest is that we have the 3rd highest proc rate coefficient. I'm not sure I understand GC's explanation of it:

We stack a ton of haste, which I'm guessing places us in the lower tier of raw AP across those specs? In any case the gem would have always been the best choice, but there are the numbers.

We use a big, slow weapon.

On our last Feng kill I had 819 hits, our rogue had 1001

"Paladin
- We're worried that we're not going to be able to get the new Seal of Justice on PTR in a good place. We still like the goal of giving Ret more damage outside of their long cooldowns, but Censure just brings a lot of benefits that are going to be hard to reproduce in any kind of "build up to burst" mechanic. When faced with decisions like these where the new design isn't a clear win, we think the right decision is to revert the change. It's possible we could buff Seal of Justice (the 5.1 version) to 20% damage from 16% damage, but overall it would still probably not get much use in PvP.
- However, we haven't given up on the idea of solving Ret's problems of long cooldowns. We are going to try changing the 4pc PvP set bonus to lowering the cooldown on Avenging Wrath by 1 min. This is a set bonus that has worked out pretty well in PvE and would help Ret keep up pressure more frequently without getting to the point of one-shot abilities."

Straight from another blue post by Ghostcrawler.

While I agree with this fully I think part of the issue is not so much the raiding Ret Paladins as it is the Ret's that just play to see big numbers at times. GC made a Cooler post awhile back talking about redoing the stats as a whole (item squish iirc) and while for them internally it looked fine and we were doing the same damage (all classes not just ret) The team decided that a lot of people would freak out if they went from doing 200k dps down to 2000 dps (as an example)

I think the same thing would apply here I would be for them removing some of the damage from censure and putting it to use within other abilites that we have to help level out our dps and not be so much of a burst class but we are some of the "minority" in that thinking vs the rest of the players that would head to the forums and complain that they can not hit the big numbers from cooldowns and that "we have been nerfed for no reason" attitude.

While I love my burst (and as does my guild) I would gladly give up some of it to be inline with warriors/dk's with sustained damage over all then have a huge burst every 3 minutes (2 with current 4pc T14 set) Yet at the same time how many people would turn and accuse them of just flat out nerfing us for no reason and not see that while the burst would be a nerf (in essence) overall we would be better off and happier as a whole.

They really should just give us 2 min wings baseline again. Doesn't increase burst from what we have now, they've given it as a set bonus for both pve/pvp, and would push ret more towards middle of the pack.

I can't say that I agree with either statements here. Yes Ret is known for burst, yes censure is strong but was designed to be so to compete with other DPS melee and range included. It gives us some damage during ranged periods of boss fights, and provides us with a legitimate way to have a "cleave" mechanic while allowing us to vary our rotation with TV or DS instead of a boring sweeping strikes button.

Talking about players who would "cry" there's more to why blizzard doesn't want to buff sustained damage than negative forum comments/lost subs. It gives us more utility for fights that call for it albeit t14 hasn't presented enough of these to argue but looking back at Zon'ozz, Hagara, and Spine 2 minute burst was an amazing tool to have. It's also a niche that separates us from warriors and dks and if they can balance us without losing an identity we're glad to have instead of the alternative they'll chose the former, and I for one am happy for that.

Personally I enjoy our niche of insanely high burst damage/mediocre sustain. It makes fights like Wind Lord hc a lot of fun.

I wish they would look into some way to make our AoE even remotely competitive though. The fact that they don't have much headroom to buff HotR or DS without making them the best option on single target means the only way they can really fix it is through seals. Though maybe Exorcism working more like Howling blast would be pretty cool.

They already have a glyph in place that makes it do AoE damage, the problem is it is at the expense of doing the regular single target damage we're already accustom to.

Not really. Glyph of Mass Exo doesn't cost you any single target damage at all - it does full damage to the primary target and splashes 25% bonus damage to all other targets in 8 yds. It is simply inconvenient on some fights because it requires melee range.

This is a really common misconception and I don't understand why people think this. Glyph of Mexo is really great.

I'd probably call Ret a slow burst kind of spec. We usually can't do 500k in a few GCD's, but our average damage during our cooldowns is usually competitive with quick burst specs and can pressure opponents if played right.