The protection article in the Theorycrafting Think Tank is currently being rewritten for WotLK. Sorry for any delay.

I saw a +10 Stamina armor patch in the 2.3 PTR that was available for quite a few slots, including hands and shoulders. Not bad, I'd say.

I'd also like to add that Spell Hit helps those people who use Seal of Vengeance while tanking, since the proc can be resisted. It's not 100% confirmed either, but apparently Precision will affect spells in 2.3, so keep that in mind as well.

I'm pretty sure Thunderclap was changed to physical damage (and consequently physical hit rating) around the same time they buffed it to include an attack speed debuff.

Not true, for some godawful reason it´s still a spell and can therefore be resisted (which it does quite often). On another note, you might want to include the [Glove Reinforcements] that are coming in 2.3.

Thanks for the suggestions, I'll probably make a few updates tomorrow and I'll take a bit of a better browse through all the new goodies that'll be added in 2.3.

I'd appreciate if an Alliance paladin could post a few details on how Seal of Vengeance works exactly, mostly looking for information on how it's procs works, and it's scaling. I do know a few basic pieces of information (That it's PPM based for example, and that it's potentially nice on fights with periodic aggro clears), but that's about it.

I'll take your word for it, then. That seems a little buggy for a physical ability to resist, but when did anything about the spell system make sense, eh?

Seal of Vengeance is approximately 20 PPM. The proc can only trigger on a successful melee hit, and the proc can be resisted seperately. It stacks up to five times - refreshing the duration every proc - each stack does a base of 30 damage per tick, and each stack gets (roughly) a 4% spell damage coefficient per tick. It ticks once every 3 seconds. So that 5 stacks maximum, each stack gets 5 ticks, 4% per tick means a 100% coefficient over the 15 seconds at a full stack. I verified these numbers on Live just now.

When you have five stacks on the target, procs will instantly deal 2% of your spell damage to the target.

The Judgement deals 120 damage per stack currently on the target, and receives a normal 42.86% coefficient for an instant attack, regardless of how many stacks are present.

Much like how you can stack up absurdly high rolling Lifeblooms with trinkets and Power Infusion, you can get absurdly high Seal of Vengeance stacks by having damage trinkets, Avenging Wrath, or Power Infusion present when you apply the first stack of Holy Vengeance. So if you had an Icon of the Silver Crescent on my gear (493 spell damage, plus 16 from Improved Divine Spirit, plus 80 from a Holy flask, plus 23 from food, plus 40 from weapon oil; 850 total with the trinket up), with Power Infusion and Avenging Wrath up when I applied my first stack, it would tick for 436 every 3 seconds (276 TPS).

The big weakness of Seal of Vengeance, however, is its inconsistency due to its proc-based nature, which is further compounded by how fast tanking weapons tend to be.Assume you're using a Gladiator's Gavel at 1.6 speed, so the proc rate is ~ 0.533% per hit, you are missed, dodged, or parried about 15% of the time, and the proc resists 17% of the time. That means any given swing only has a 37.6% chance to proc Seal of Vengeance, which isn't all that hot in fights that may also contain an element of movement.

Theras. Are you sure you are getting a 100% coefficient for the SoV Dot?

I was sure there was only an 85% coefficient ie (750 + 85% Spell Damage) / 15 seconds.

And when i just tested this on live, it matched the 85% coefficient. Did you have some % damage modifier (1HWS/Crusade) etc on?

I know this may sound silly. But you didn't happen to test SoV on the ogres just by shattrah (as it is where i always go), and didnt notice that you also had Blessing of Auchindoun as this 5% buff plus on top of 1HWS and 85% coefficet would also show 257 to 258 ticks:-

(750+493*0.85)*1.05*1.05 = 1288.88 damage / 15 = 257.7 per tick

I myself have forgotten about this blessing numerous times on testing.

So I did. And looking back on my log I did indeed get the tower buff. Mystery solved.

You forgot to factor in the base 5% miss rate, which would make the uncrushability requirements 62.07% without the Libram, or 67.4% with it.

You also might want to add this macro, which will accurately display your current avoidance total. Put it on a button, activate Holy Shield then push that button to determine if you're uncrushable or not:

/script DEFAULT_CHAT_FRAME:AddMessage("Need 102.4 combined avoidance. Currently at:",0.8,0.8,1)
/script DEFAULT_CHAT_FRAME:AddMessage(GetDodgeChance()+GetBlockChance()+GetParryChance()+5+(G etCombatRating(CR_DEFENSE_SKILL)*150/355 + 20)*0.04,1,0.5,0)

I'd like to throw in that if you're not going to tank any level 73 mobs, then your defense target is 485, instead of 490. Also, mobs in resist fights do not crush (do we have a comprehensive list of this? I think Illidan doesn't crush either).

Don't you mean Avenging Wrath?

As for caster weapon progression, the [Gladiator's Gavel] is a very solid choice once it becomes available via the honor system. It has more STA and spell damage than the [Gavel of Unearthed Secrets], in addition to being faster.

Well done, Chicken. I was working up something like this, but couldn't get beyond the first page. A few thoughts for additions that might be useful:

A section on armor. Something evaluating the relative merits of armor vs stamina. Someone did this in the old thread; I'll try to dig it up and make it pretty.

A section on fight-specific notes. A lot of people posted in the old thread asking "I'm about to start tanking _______. What should I do?" I'm thinking specifically about some of the trickier fights like Hydross, Voidreaver, Al'Ar, Leo, and maybe Morogrim and even Prince. This could have like a paragraph for each fight summarizing the gearing and tactics for the fight, and then links to the posts in the old thread where people discuss them. I'll work on this too, unless you want to dig these up yourself.

Great work so far!