
Originally Posted by EvadDeWahr
Is it just me or are people being deliberately obtuse?
The crit to mp5 model proposed was a simple one. But it was a post model not a projection model.
The premise stated was that you could with the tool work out how much crit had counted as MP5 in a fight that you had already done.
So you take a parse of a fight you have already DONE. Take the number of heals and divided by fight length. This gives the number of heals per second that you cast.
So note the fight has already finished. You have decided already how many heals where enough to win that fight. You cannot change what you did in that fight.
So now you want to know for THAT fight how much MP5 was my Crit worth.
Then look up the MP5 value for that cast speed (note that it will overestimate the MP5 value unless all your heals where Holy Lights)
It is a simple modeling tool. It is not nearly as useful as RAWR but I doubt that it was ever meant to replace RAWR.
This tool will NOT tell how much MP5 your Crit is worth in the next fight even of the same boss. But then no tool will ever do that.
But the principle is correct that a certain amount of crit will save you a certain amount of mana per cast independent of starting mana.
|
Yes, this is evident. It is also irrelevant. If all the model does is force you to do a bunch of unecessary maths in order to reach a conclusion you could have come to in about 30 seconds of looking at WoL / WWS / WMO reports, then it's utterly useless.
Either way you look at it, it's bad. Either it's a tool that gives you an uninteresting, irrelevant piece of data after the fact, or it's a flawed model which misrepresents the worth of MP5 and crit.
And yes, X crit will save you Y mana per cast independant of starting mana, that's why people are so adamant that crit is modelled as
saving mana, and not
giving or restoring mana, which is how Abe is trying to model it. I'm not sure if you were agreeing or disagreeing with this from the context of your statement, so forgive me if I'm being redundant here.