Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Rogues

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09/03/08, 5:41 PM   #1601
Antiarc
Still alive
 
Antiarc's Avatar
 
Human Rogue
 
Cenarion Circle
Originally Posted by Ashen View Post
This was included in the post that revealed all the new Rogue Changes. Tricks of the Trade will be subject to some kind of anti-stacking debuff.
Honestly, this just makes it more likely that rogues will be chaining it on each other, because if it has a 30 sec exhaustion debuff on the recipient, I'm supposed to let it sit there while cooled down because another rogue used it on the tank? I don't think so.

Originally Posted by Darlal View Post
I think other interesting questions arise about who is "generating" the threat. Does the threat come from the target, and thus is multiplied by say a Prot warrior's threat multiplier, or from the rogue (and thus is subject to the rogue's -30% threat?). Furthermore, how will this interact with invulnerability moves? Can I TotT a group of mobs onto an iceblocked mage with fan of knives...what about a shielded pally?
Well, we know the likely answer to these via Misdirection.

a) The threat transferred to the target is subject to the target's threat multipliers. We don't know how it'll interact with the rogue's passive modifier, since hunters don't have one, but I suspect it will ignore it, and effectively consider that the tank is doing any damage that the rogue is doing for that duration. That is, a rogue crits for 1k, and the tank receives threat as though he had crit for 1k.

b) You can still add threat to iceblocked mages and shielded paladins, but mobs will ignore that target while the invul is active. Neither of those skills modifies the mob's threat table, it simply makes that player ineligible for target selection while the debuff is active.

Last edited by Antiarc : 09/03/08 at 5:46 PM.

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 5:48 PM   #1602
Taschen
Glass Joe
 
Undead Rogue
 
Maelstrom
I feel that they've done a lot to benefit rogues, however, I personally feel 3 points for Relentless Strikes (8 - 16 - 25) would be the better option for balance and flexability, specially for rogues attempting to use mutilate/assassination builds which is still very poison heavy (and they've done very little to adress that, compared to what they've done for bottom sub), and for combat daggers. Then make the new unfair advantage a 5 point talent (20-100%) and attack with offhand instead of mainhand (for combat potency) and also on full resists, and make blood poisoning a 3 point talent (1,2,3%).

My second thought is that they should really swap the new overkill ability with premed. It seems as if blizz has the 2 trees confused. Premed would add much more interesting tactics for mutilate because it gives us extra time to pool energy (something which we require during pvp for ea/find weaknesses/ kidney shot cycles), or in PVE to get SNE up early (premed, mutilate, cb, evisc?). Overkill is obviously a talent that would be best used with shadow dance. However both would require a nerf.

Tricks of the Trade, I'm not sure I read that correctly, it increases the damage that the target does by 15%? I hope that's a typo.

Just wanted to mention that I think killing spree has the possiblity to be a very good ability. For starters it will allow us to quickly close gaps, something rogues have been compaining about with all the fights requiring heavy movement, but I do hope that definition of "assaults" is more than just 2 hits per target.

Also, they said they were going to give lightning reflexes more "oomph" I expect this to be closely related to the new changes on unfair advantage.

Last edited by Taschen : 09/03/08 at 5:58 PM.

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 5:53 PM   #1603
Neckface
Piston Honda
 
Undead Rogue
 
Bonechewer
Originally Posted by Aldriana View Post
I suspect it will put a buff on both the rogue and the target, which prevents one from being involved in more than one at a time, to prevent weird loops. Never mind the simple issues of chaining - you don't really want to have it set up so two rogues have each other TotTed at the same time.
Blue made a comment about still needing a mechanic to prevent 5 rogues chain TotT'ing. So I'm guessing a debuff on the target, like Weakened Soul. With a 15 second duration 2 rogues would be the most needed.

On the topic of threat in general, I wonder if the new mechanics will actually make Feint and thus Sleight of Hand something that we find useful? Sleight of Hand should scale somehow, though, perhaps with AP. Or let it crit?

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 6:05 PM   #1604
 Andeh
The Titleless
 
Andeh
Goblin Rogue
 
No WoW Account
One thing that hasn't yet been brought up about Close Quarters Combat is it has the potential for fist builds to use some of the really fast offhand daggers. Since in general they tend to let offhand daggers be slightly faster (1.4s, with a few rare 1.3s), compared to fists and swords (1.5s with a few rare 1.4s), the extra Combat Potency procs gained by a fast dagger offhand might help offset the inferiority of CQC compared to Sword Spec.

United States Offline
Old 09/03/08, 6:17 PM   #1605
songster
Chief Passenger
 
Gnome Rogue
 
Earthen Ring (EU)
Originally Posted by sp00n View Post
Really disappointed with the RS change, worst change I can remember so far.
Honestly, they should either leave it where it was or just make it trainable, but taking the single best talent (at least before this nerf) and sticking it into another tree, basically forcing you to spread your points into all 3 talent trees, is just plain stupid.
I really don't understand this (or the variants posted by a hundred other people). Yes, it's a nerf to RS. So? Other stuff's got buffed, and the numbers will doubtless be tuned further. The only reason RS was mandatory in TBC raiding is because it's grossly overpowered per point spent. Now it's a 5-point talent, it's much less powerful per point, and there will probably be better places to put those 5 points. To which the only possible reply is "so put them elsewhere then".

Yes, the new-look RS may well be comparatively weak in terms of DPS per talent point spent. Nobody's forcing you to take it. Take something else, and let the new RS become something that is desperately needed - a reasonable lowish-power DPS talent in the bottom end of Sub, so that you can have a PvE Sub build without the first 15 points being 100% filler.

Great Britain Offline
Old 09/03/08, 6:30 PM   #1606
Pinch
Glass Joe
 
Pinch's Avatar
 
Gnome Rogue
 
Sen'jin
As PvE mutilate in WotLK;
The new RS is still worth taking, as you can use Subtlety points to get Serrated Blades now (it was moved down to t3). All you really have to lose is some hit from precision as well as some points in close quarters combat.

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 7:08 PM   #1607
Kithelina
Glass Joe
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Rexxar
I've been following this thread and Vul's on the beta forums pretty closely. One thing I haven't seen brought up is whether Blizz will continue to allow Opportunity to apply to Mutilate damage at all now that the positional requirement has been removed. I know Blizz hasn't said anything either way, but I fear that it is a possibility.

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 7:11 PM   #1608
Neto-
Bald Bull
 
Neto-'s Avatar
 
wut
Gnome Warlock
 
No WoW Account
Originally Posted by Kithelina View Post
I've been following this thread and Vul's on the beta forums pretty closely. One thing I haven't seen brought up is whether Blizz will continue to allow Opportunity to apply to Mutilate damage at all now that the positional requirement has been removed. I know Blizz hasn't come out and stated it will be removed, but I fear that it is a possibility.
Well, while that is a possibility, I don't think it is very likely, since removing the positional requirements, technically, does not improve Mutilate's DPS. If they do remove Mutilate from Opportunity, that would be because it needed balancing.

One thing that they might do, though, is simply making Opportunity passive and not "when striking from behind".

Obviously, this is all speculation and they may remove Mutilate from Opportunity in 10 minutes.

@Cromethus: I don't think we will ever take Camouflage for PvE, our opener is such a small part of our total DPS that it wouldn't ever be worth spending points to guarantee it, as it doesn't have an impact in your performance if you choose to not use it at all.

And yeah, I'd take 2 points out of Close Quarters Combat to get Relentless Strikes and Opportunity.

Last edited by Neto- : 09/03/08 at 7:36 PM.

Originally Posted by Aldriana
But while Vulajin is only a pale shadow of my brilliance, he still contributes a fair amount to the community so I'd feel guilty

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 7:12 PM   #1609
Cromethus
Glass Joe
 
Undead Rogue
 
Aegwynn
As PvE mutilate in WotLK;
The new RS is still worth taking, as you can use Subtlety points to get Serrated Blades now (it was moved down to t3). All you really have to lose is some hit from precision as well as some points in close quarters combat.
I can see this happening, though getting precision and 3/5 CQC seems to be more attractive atm because we have to spend less 'filler'. 3 points floating around in sub w/ no DPS talents to take... I *can* see rogues taking Camo for increased movement speed. After all, how often do you give up your opener (if u use it at all) just so you can get to your target faster. These 3 points might actually be worth a little bit. Not much, but something.

Ideally, I would like to see them trade the worthless Feint buff on Sleight of Hand and have it buff Tricks of the Trade instead. That way, combat and mutilate rogues would have something cool to spend points on as they head to Serrated Blades.

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 7:29 PM   #1610
Kithelina
Glass Joe
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Rexxar
Originally Posted by Neto- View Post
Well, while that is a possibility, I don't think it is very likely, since removing the positional requirements, technically, does not improve Mutilate's DPS. If they do remove Mutilate from Opportunity, that would be because it needed balancing.

One thing that they might do, though, is simply making Opportunity passive and not "when striking from behind".
I was considering whether Blizz would make such a change to Opportunity, but I really don't think they would. A two-point, first tier talent adding a flat 20% damage to your bread and butter ability seems a bit out of control to me. Find Weakness provides a 10% increase for five points, deep in the Assassination tree. I know it's not exactly apples to apples, but it is fairly comparable. In order to keep Opportunity balanced, the positional requirement is necessary in my view. However, this is just my opinion, Blizz may not share it.

I haven't personally seen any classes level 80 abilities in action, but intuitively an Offhand + Opportunity Mutilate appears extremely powerful. I wouldn't be surprised to see Blizz to take some balancing actions.

That said, I know this is all currently written in sand and changes may be made before I finish this post.

Last edited by Kithelina : 09/03/08 at 7:35 PM.

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 7:38 PM   #1611
Neto-
Bald Bull
 
Neto-'s Avatar
 
wut
Gnome Warlock
 
No WoW Account
Originally Posted by Kithelina View Post
I was considering whether Blizz would make such a change to Opportunity, but I really don't think they would. A two-point, first tier talent adding a flat 20% damage to your bread and butter ability seems a bit out of control to me. Find Weakness provides a 10% increase for five points, deep in the Assassination tree. I know it's not exactly apples to apples, but it is fairly comparable. In order to keep Opportunity balanced, the positional requirement is necessary in my view. However, this is just my opinion, Blizz may not share it.

I haven't personally seen any classes level 80 abilities in action, but intuitively an Offhand + Opportunity Mutilate appears extremely powerful. I wouldn't be surprised to see Blizz to take some balancing actions.

That said, I know this is all currently written in sand and changes may be made before I finish this post.
Well, you have to see it this way: Opportunity has always been the way it is: a flat 20% bonus to Mutilate, before we could do it without positional requirements. The spec doesn't get stronger in any way because of it (except the less annoyance), so it shouldn't warrant a change just because of the positional requirement removal - but I definitely could see it changing to tune Mutilate damage.

Originally Posted by Aldriana
But while Vulajin is only a pale shadow of my brilliance, he still contributes a fair amount to the community so I'd feel guilty

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 7:39 PM   #1612
Zaniel
Piston Honda
 
Zaniel's Avatar
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Aggramar
Originally Posted by Ashen View Post
This was included in the post that revealed all the new Rogue Changes. Tricks of the Trade will be subject to some kind of anti-stacking debuff.
I think this is even more reason to tweak TotT to be, in my mind, more rogue-like:
Tricks of the Trade: The current party or raid member becomes the target of your Tricks of the Trade. The threat caused by your next attack and all actions taken for 6 sec afterwards will be transferred to the target. In addition, all damage you deal is increased by 15% during this time. 30 sec cooldown.
We're buffing ourselves, and thus boosting someone else's threat via transference. Not to mention this would substantially limit the "utility" the ability provides because we won't be able to chain this on high(er)-DPS allies. They'd only gain our threat, which is only useful to tanks.

Now, given, we'd probably still need a 15second weakened soul-type debuff or something to limit the amount of threat gen we could boost a tank with, but then again maybe the threat isn't the part that needed limiting in the first place. I'd suggest that the damage increase was what needed mitigation, and by limiting that to the rogue only we've sufficiently limited it.

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 7:45 PM   #1613
Antiarc
Still alive
 
Antiarc's Avatar
 
Human Rogue
 
Cenarion Circle
Originally Posted by Kithelina View Post
I haven't personally seen any classes level 80 abilities in action, but intuitively an Offhand + Opportunity Mutilate appears extremely powerful. I wouldn't be surprised to see Blizz to take some balancing actions.
Well, with Prey on the Weak, Lethality, Dual Wield and Opportunity, I was double-critting Mutilate for 7.2k.








On a level 1 test dummy.








With the "yay I can have mutilate and PotW because mutilate doesn't untrain" bug. >_>

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 7:52 PM   #1614
Kithelina
Glass Joe
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Rexxar
Originally Posted by Neto- View Post
Well, you have to see it this way: Opportunity has always been the way it is: a flat 20% bonus to Mutilate, before we could do it without positional requirements. The spec doesn't get stronger in any way because of it (except the less annoyance), so it shouldn't warrant a change just because of the positional requirement removal - but I definitely could see it changing to tune Mutilate damage.
Oh, you are absolutely right, I should have been more clear. I just view removal of Mut from Opportunity as something of a possibility due to the changes in the Combat tree, not simply because of the positional requirement. A non-positional ability doesn't fit in the current theme of Opp, but it appears that theme is changing. It's just a reason I could see Blizz using to justify such a decision. Honestly, I'm just being overly paranoid because I currently like these changes so much, I'm expecting shoes to start dropping at any time.

Last edited by Kithelina : 09/03/08 at 7:59 PM.

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 8:49 PM   #1615
Queue
Glass Joe
 
Tauren Druid
 
Frostmane
Originally Posted by Antiarc View Post
In what situation would you ever use a 50-energy, 30-second-cooldown interrupt over Kick or Deadly Throw? Three casters that cast a spell at the same time within 8 yards of each other on a 30-sec+ cooldown? Why wouldn't you just use a combination of 3 rogues/shamans/warriors/mages/marks hunters?.
In a situation where you're also using a 50-energy, 30-second-cooldown, 8-yard range AOE. All I'm saying is it's not a bad tac-on to a useful trash dps ability.

I'm not sure the speculation on tricks rotations (or stacks, or whichever) is really useful until the choice they make for it becomes clear.

Rolling it on the tank seems like a spectacularly bad idea. Hopefully your tank isn't badly geared or skilled enough to need it, and it's a waste of a damage boost. Putting the first one on it could be good though.

My guild has two rogues that raid enough to matter, and honestly even with the raid-wide buffing I can't really see us adding much more than that. I could easily see us bouncing the buff off eachother every cooldown, but on the off chance that blizz decides to make that impossible there's always ye old hunter with FD we could toss it to. Heck, I could have a lot of fun with throwing this on our enh shammy guild leader and then laugh when he has to has to use his "aggro dump" aka ankh.

Offline
Old 09/03/08, 9:04 PM   #1616
kharen
Don Flamenco
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
The Venture Co (EU)
Been playing around with one of the War-Tools talent trees for a while. The Relentless change isn't as big a deal as my initial gut reaction made it seem. I still think it'd still work better as a 3pt talent, though; right now it looks to me like it's 5 points purely because Blizzard has some kind of guideline that tier 1 should be either 5/5 or 2/3/5. Would be nice if they could break that and maybe chop it down to three and add another 2pt talent to T1 sub (so that they retain the 10 points total on tier 1).

Bigger concerns for me right now are the sheer bloat of deep Assassination (19 points spread across tiers 8/9 alone; most classes have 13-14 or so points in those tiers combined), and the sparseness of the tree early on (for a non-mutilate/backstab build, if you want to get Lethality you get a choice between... imp evis or remorseless attacks. yay; luckily skipping Lethality seems entirely viable) and the amount of filler required to fill out Combat, particularly the roadblocks at 15, 32/34 (depending on whether you count Vitality as a worthwhile talent or not), and 43 points, where -pending whatever changes they come up with for Lightning Reflexes- you basically have a choice of crap or more crap (ok, imp sprint is quite nice, as filler goes, but the rest is entirely uninteresting).

Subtlety remains a clusterfuck, as ever. I still can't discern any overriding theme for the tree, beyond being a dumping ground for pvp talents.

Offline
Old 09/04/08, 12:05 AM   #1617
Valen
Don Flamenco
 
Valen's Avatar
 
Human Rogue
 
Stormrage (EU)
Seems like combat dagger took the most benefit out of relentless strike/opportunity change. Being the spec with lowest combo point generation and finisher use, it took the least energy back from RS. Now however, it got access to both opportunity and lethality and also 25% extra critical damage, being a highest critical chance setup.

At the current stage, the build would probably look something like: War Tools with 3 points spare to either get 60% from RS or poison talents.

Now remains to be seen whether it's beneficial to use any other finisher along with SnD with a CD build, as backstab scales extremly well at the moment.

Offline
Old 09/04/08, 2:40 AM   #1618
Hildegard
Tinker
 
Hildegard's Avatar
 
Gnome Rogue
 
Forscherliga (EU)
By the way and a bit offtopic:

The training dummies will most likely allow to test a lot of stuff much easier than before.

In an upcoming update one of the dummies will be level 80 with normal lvl 80 mob stats, the other will be a "boss" dummy with normal lvl 80 boss mob stats.
WoW Forums -> Thanks for the training dummies!


Hildegard Sprigglespruxx - Wissenschaftlerin am Institut für Pfuschkunde

http://forscherliga.wikia.com/wiki/Hildegard
Hildes PVP Blog - Vom Stümper zum Gladiator

Germany Offline
Old 09/04/08, 2:53 AM   #1619
 Andeh
The Titleless
 
Andeh
Goblin Rogue
 
No WoW Account
A couple ideas I've had while tinkering with various builds. I generally pick an overarching spec goal, then fill in talents until I "get stuck". The ideas below are designed to help smooth out talent flow, so that a player doesn't hit a point in a tree where the talents are so bad, they're better off switching to another tree. (I'm kind of intrigued by the concept of a "heavy utility" Subtlety spec which uses Hemo most of the time, but pulls out a dagger and chains Ambushes during Shadow Dance.)

1) Move Blood Splatter to Tier 2 Assassination. It's a talent that will not be used by a Mutilate build (being 1 tier up from CttC). However, both Combat and Subtlety get stuck in Assassination tier 2 if they try to go for tier 3. Combat & Hemo don't want either Puncturing Wounds or Imp. Eviscerate, and neither Imp. Eviscerate or Ruthlessness helps a deep Subt. BS build much.

2) Change Lightning Reflexes to a 3 point talent for 2/4/6% dodge and 1/2/3% haste. Right now tier 4 Combat has ZERO offensive talents. By limiting it to 3 talents, they can still encourage players to pick up another 2 point "survival" talent like Imp. Sprint or Endurance. However, it could easily be a 5 point talent as well (1% dodge and haste per point).

3) Master of Subtlety needs to also cover all attacks while the Rogue is "Shadow Dancing." It used to do this, when SD "Vanished" the Rogue, so this is just a patch.

4) Delete Deadened Nerves. No one ever takes it, and no one ever will. Move one of the deep Assassination bloat talents up to take its spot (most likely candidate Infectious Poisons).

United States Offline
Old 09/04/08, 3:41 AM   #1620
Urotsukidoji
Glass Joe
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Malfurion (EU)
i would like to see a spellresist also in lightning reflexes.

Offline
Old 09/04/08, 4:06 AM   #1621
Felyae
Glass Joe
 
Felyae's Avatar
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Kil'Jaeden (EU)
I'd like to bring the mace spec on the table again - all I have seen was a short posting two pages ago or so, did I miss something?

The new -15% armor seems pretty strong, if it is applied first and the fixed ArPs later. I would assume this, since the effect would diminish the other way around. Can anyone confirm this?
Are there any calculations on this yet, especially compared with sword spec?

Offline
Old 09/04/08, 4:22 AM   #1622
PSGarak
Bald Bull
 
PSGarak's Avatar
 
Undead Warlock
 
Hyjal
I would wonder whether Serrated Blades will be changed to be like new Mace Spec, or the other way around. 15%AC seems like a double-edged sword prone to bugs and misunderstanding. They're reinventing the ArP wheel unnecessarily, unless Armor Penetration Rating also turns into a %-based system.


Offline
Old 09/04/08, 5:45 AM   #1623
Ratak - US KT
Von Kaiser
 
Human Rogue
 
Thunderlord
Originally Posted by Neto- View Post
Well, you have to see it this way: Opportunity has always been the way it is: a flat 20% bonus to Mutilate, before we could do it without positional requirements. The spec doesn't get stronger in any way because of it (except the less annoyance), so it shouldn't warrant a change just because of the positional requirement removal - but I definitely could see it changing to tune Mutilate damage.
I don't have a problem with leaving Opportunity and Mutilate as they are - after this latest change of course. In this case the change they've made buffs the solo/farming ability and PvP ability of Mutilate builds (as you are no longer completely gimped if the mob is facing you forcing you to Gouge etc. and run around the back) and ties with the Gouge change. For raiding you'll be attacking at the back almost always (except for odd fights and getting a couple extra shots while getting into postition).

And no change to Opportunity would still give a 'Daggers do more from the back' old school feel. I just don't see why Blizzard would feel the need to do make further changes.

Offline
Old 09/04/08, 5:52 AM   #1624
Asuah
Glass Joe
 
Undead Rogue
 
<PvD>
Gul'dan
On the topic of Fan of Knives and the interrupt, I see nothing but added utility when you ToTT a pack of mobs to your tank with good certainty that casters won't lag behind. And I can't be the only one who sees the additional potential to use ToTT in conjunction with popping Fan of Knives and Killing Spree on trash. This is spectacularly less useful in 25-man settings where most things get taken under control quickly, but how much would you have killed for something like this in Karazhan to make your presence that much more valuable?

Anyone else think that the new positioning and cost of RS makes it far less accessible compared to its old position for deep combat builds? I know this makes splashing deeper into sublety for Serrated Blades at the cost of Lethality more appealing, but I was really looking forward to having the extra 20% proc rate on poisons which the new position and cost straight deprives me of (not to mention the loss of Murder to this spec).

Offline
Old 09/04/08, 6:03 AM   #1625
nuoHep
Von Kaiser
 
Undead Rogue
 
Magtheridon (EU)
Originally Posted by PSGarak View Post
I would wonder whether Serrated Blades will be changed to be like new Mace Spec, or the other way around. 15%AC seems like a double-edged sword prone to bugs and misunderstanding. They're reinventing the ArP wheel unnecessarily, unless Armor Penetration Rating also turns into a %-based system.
ArP rating is already % based effect on beta. With 15.384 rating giving 1% armor reduce at level 80. Don't know if its really working at this moment. But thats what my character sheet showed when I equipped some gloves with ArP rating on them.

Offline
Closed Thread

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Rogues

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WotLK - Complete Mage Compendium (3.3.3 live) Roywyn Mages 5355 04/08/10 7:51 PM
WotLK Talents & Abilities Discussion Neruse Hunters 5086 11/14/08 9:39 PM
WotLK Discussion - Talents and abilities. Lamaros Death Knights 4142 11/14/08 12:09 PM