From the GUI: When you Import a character from the Armory or from Wowhead, it moves you to Simulate tab where you will see a wall of text. Included here will be a talent link, a list of glyphs, a list of gear, and a list of lines that start "actions+=".

Comment out the line of interest by inserting a '#' character at the beginning of the line.

While the results (scale factors, etc) are static, the loot links are dynamic.

The wowhead profile is quite old..... but gear discovery in-game has marched on relentlessly.

It simply means, that this isn't meant to be a BiS profile.

I've been banging my head on my desk for 3 hours now trying to figure out why the crit rate for envenom in my SimulationCraft logs does not match the crit rate of my white hits, and the crit rate for Mutilate does not equal my white crit rate + 15%.

The white crit rate is EXACTLY as it should be (tooltip melee_crit_rate + 3%_Master_Poisoner_buff) and my poison crit rate is exactly correct (tooltip spell_crit_rate + 3%_Master_Poisoner_buff) but my envenoms crit roughly 2% less than my white hits. And my mutilates crit only 12% more than my white hits (instead of 15% from the Puncturing Wounds talent).

I'm assuming it's not a bug and that I am missing something like a talent or the way Blizzard adds percentages but I can't figure out what it is.
I disabled cold blood in the simulation; that was modifying the envenom crit rate in the other direction. Also, I have no crit proc gear.
I ran 100 second fights, 500 second fights, and 5000 second fights, all for 5000+ iterations, and was getting basically the same result.

By the way I am in love with this tool. I discovered the target_resilience parameter today which made me very happy...

-Brone

Short answer is that it doesn't actually matter which is which. Consider:

For simplicity, lets say our crit rate is 50% and our miss/dodge rate is 10%. If we do the miss/dodge roll first, we then get 90% hits and 10% dodges; then half of those 90% that hit crit, so we get 45% crit, 45% regular hit, and 10% dodge.

If, on the other hand, we do the crit roll first, we get 50% crit and 50% hits, and then 10% of each miss, leaving us with... 45% crit, 45% regular hit, and 10% dodge.

Hence: they're both right, and are saying the same thing. You can think about it in either order, and the math works out.

I got very strange results with this, and found that deleting "&dot.rupture.remains" from two of the eviscerate lines brought the DPS much closer to that of rupture cycle simulations.

Excellent point. I had not considered that the Rogue action pseudo-AI had rupture-related conditionals on the eviscerate logic.

There's a one second cd on HaT procs. So hat_donor would be the abilities that actually can proc HaT. And as far as I can see the honor_among_thieves variable is used to track the one second cooldown. The 1/3 chance of proccing HaT with 1/3 points are included in the rng to determine if a combo point is gained and not in the hat_donor.

Looks like the code simply checks for the existence of that HAT talent without actually looking at the number of ranks. This is a bug. Please open an Issue on the site.

Note that "hat_donor" refers to the actor generating HAT procs for Rogues in his party. In single-player sims, the option "critical_strike_intervals=A/B/C/D" represent average intervals between critical strikes for four "virtual" players. If you run with multiple players and put them in the same party, then the "critical_strike_intervals" option is ignored and the Rogue receives HAT procs from his party members.

Doesn't check for the ranks in HaT?