Since the spreadsheet has no idea what gear you have, it obviously does not know which trinkets you use.
You are suppose to calculate the values for the stats of the trinket (spell power, crit, haste, etc) and add those to the total stats you plug in.
If it helps, check the fields from the trinkets in the spreadsheet since it shows how to figure average values for procs (eg. Dying Curse has a 765 SP proc, that is up for 10 seconds with a 1 min internal cooldown, therefor you can value it at 765*10/60 = 127.5 SP).

CharDev

http://elitistjerks.com/f31/t21713-r...leased_1_30_a/
I assume you have the Mixology - Spell - World of Warcraft skill as an alchemist ...

-- EDIT --
Flashy!

Thanx!

How does that exactly explain my difference in spell? I thought it only lenghtened the effect of flasks.

It increases the bonus, as well - not just the duration. [Flask of the Frost Wyrm] gives 162 spell power with Mixology, which is a 37 spell power gain over the standard 125 bonus of the flask.

There are two sites that immediately spring to mind:

Warcrafter and chardev.org v6 ~ a World of Warcraft character planner

These should allow you to do some gear shuffling and work out the best combination.

how can flow of knowledge and sundial both have a value of 182 (no hit) when their proc is the same, but sundial has the benefit of 84 crit rating?

It's because Bink probably didn't remember to change it, on the initial screenshots the flow of knowledge had the EXACT same stats as sundial but then when the patch went live they removed the crit and changed it to resilience.

Why doesnt the dps change if you fill in Hit rating 0 or Hit Rating 1000?

Does it assume you have max HR?

Yes, it does.

I am using one of the tools you guys suggested (warcrafter) to get the base stats.

I am wondering about 1 of my trinkets. Sundial of the Exiled.

The 84 crit is already covered in the base stats, but te proc (590SP*10/60) isnt.
Would it be correct to add 98 to the potions column in the Spell row?

My potion column is already the sum of food + flask + alchemy buff. The explanation behind this number is getting a bit obfuscated now. Wouldn't it be clearer to have 2 cells for depspell for trinket that isnt already covered in base stats?

p.s. I have only valorous items atm but i have the tokens for conqueror (still deciding to buy elem or resto). The sheet says my dps would go 700 up if i take elem gear. Tempting.

Hi there, you weighted haste lot more compared to your last version, almost as equal as spellpower now, how come?

Thanks, MannÃ*

I've been wondering lately if the addition of T8 4p would increase the stat weight for crit over what it is without the 4p bonus.

Hi. This is me dealing with stupid people.
I dunno, maybe you should change the default settings, like "delay" for instance? Maybe that will affect how haste is valued or something. Otherwise it's just some random number I picked out of my head.

Well, if that's what you want to find out you could ENABLE THE FREAKING OPTION and see. It's not like it's hard to see or anything, unless you can't see "Set Bonus" sitting in the middle of the screen.

These messages are brought to you by the "Bink Wishes People Would Think More" Foundation.

Cryonic (#166): Both 2p and 4p increase the value of crit a tiny bit, but the difference is nowhere near close enough to compete with haste and spellpower.

Mann (#165): As your gear becomes more powerful, so does haste, because there's more and more damage that you can do in less time. So it's not him valuing it higher, haste really does scale as awesomely as that.

Ferala (#164): You could, however, it would be a better idea to calculate the proc separately and then calculate the portion of the time this proc is used in (1/6th with it, 5/6th without it), because it can affect the damage in a lot more ways than simple damage increase, depending on when it pops up.

P.S.: Bink in a bad mood? Let's lighten him up a bit /turn on light

They should all be 55, but it's an estimation of the cooldown time (45 sec cd, 10 sec to proc again)

I think we all know that we should use the glyphs:

Glyph of Totem of Wrath until ~2484 spell power unbuffed.
Glyph of Lightning Bolt
Glyph of Flame Shock

However, it appears in your spreadsheet that the Glyph of Shocking is showing to have more DPS than the other glyphs, are you able to confirm this?

Thank you in advance.

--- EDIT (2): Typo ---

It scales with haste and latency. Are you setting either of those to 0?

My haste rating is set to 455, and latency to 35. It still shows a bigger DPS increase than the other glyphs, however is it?

Hi, I am trying to figure out why the 4pc T8 bonus damage appears low.

Wow Web Stats

8% of LB crit damage should be 45 x 10318 x 8% = 37144 but on wws its only 25644. I was expecting it to not work out based on LO proc's not triggering the effect but not to this extent. Is this normal ?

Looks like I'd put in an incorrect formula for LvB cast times on the shocking comparison. Fixing in next release.

or set E253 and E 263 to be =MAX((2-lightningmastery)/(1+B255),1)