Originally Posted by Worthe
I figured that 3/3 in unrelenting storm for me was roughly equivalent to 5/5 convection and that I would prefer to have the savings in the form of a constant regen vs selected casts.
|
Did a quick check on these findings with Bink's SEIC 3.0.8.5 summing up the mana usage of 100 secs of casttime in the model sheet. I am not sure whats exactly calculated in these cells, but I assume it represents the mana consumption of the spells after talents and factors like Elemental Focus.
So for 100 secs casttime without BL I get with
5 points in Convection: 21868 mana
2 points in Convection: 23421 mana
0 points in Convection: 24456 mana
So lets assume I have 1k int raidbuffed. With Unrelenting Storm, this would give me 120 mp5, repectively 2400 mana in 100 secs.
If I spend 0 point in Convection I lose 2588 mana
If I spend 2 point in Convection I lose 1553 mana
So I think its ok to say, that it is better to spend 2 points on Convection and 3 Points on Unrelenting Storm than 5 points to Convection and 0 points to Unrelenting Storm. If you are still better off, if you dont spend any points to convection is difficult to say, I think it depends on your haste, because the more haste you have, the better Convection gets, compared to Unrelenting Storm. Since I didn't take BL in to account, the numbers are actually a bit worse.
Please correct me, if I was wrong using the mana column in the model sheet in Bink's SEIC...