Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Urban Rivals
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > Class Mechanics > Warlocks
Elitist Jerks Login

gamerDNA Login

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
We're testing some new features on the site regarding OpenID registration and coordination with gamerDNA. If you experience any issues with registering an account, please take the time to fill out a report and send it to this e-mail address. We would appreciate any assistance you could provide in making sure everything is functioning as intended. Thanks!

If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack (5619) Thread Tools
Old 04/30/08, 3:43 PM   #2751
Torq
Piston Honda
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Burning Legion
Originally Posted by Trickykid View Post
Expected uptime isn't 4t since some of those charge-consuming spells can re-applicate. I checked through your math and don't think I saw this taken into account since you just consider time per ISB and time per crit.

I think the model is much simpler than you think and was incorporated into leulier's sheet already. Just find weighted crit of all shadow nukes (with zero for SP spells) and use 1-(1-c)^4. Doesn't take many assumptions to consider that as accurate as we can get.
Ah, I see. That's much better. I was looking at it from the wrong direction. This is much simpler, and gives much nicer numbers (63.925% theoretical vs. 63.959% from a simulator)

So now I'm working on how to get Average ISB uptime from that (as in how long is the buff up on average)..

Oh nevermind, looking at it now, they're completely unrelated. Number of charges consumed per second is independant of how many charges there actually are; whether or not the ISB is up, the same number of charges would have been consumed.
 
User is offline.
Old 04/30/08, 8:28 PM   #2752
Tobolin
Glass Joe
 
Undead Warlock
 
Chromaggus
Originally Posted by Carnate View Post
With three locks you should be using CoE instead of CoD anyways. As long as the raid has two or more mages CoE is better dps.

Fire can be better personal DPS but you bring nothing to the table and can hurt your raid by not adding to the ISB. Shadow also provides the side buffs of Nether Prot and Soul Leach.

Side note last I heard Fire was the better DPS spec for mages anyways. Ours all go fire cept on Illidan (parasites and flames damage).
except we raid with one mage, and hes 40/0/21, aka no point. sigh, the wws i was going to link expired on the 18th =\ but it was a mage doing 2700+ on gorefiend as arcane. not saying taht its the *best* spec by any means, id prefer to have a fire mage myself, id like to try incinerate out... but arcane seems to do comparable dmg.

"as long as the raid has two or more mages" --- exept again, we dont. that'd be about as effective as casting cow while having a warrior do imp demo.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 1:43 AM   #2753
 frmorrison
Divine Protector
 
frmorrison's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Mal'Ganis
Assuming that Mage speced correctly (Fire), he would be doing more dps than that.

Even with just one Mage in the raid, assuming he could do 1850 dps (ignoring any Warlock fire dps), casting CoE increased raid dps over using CoD.

CoW is pretty worthless, having a Warrior cast it every 2 minutes or so isn't much an issue (unless they are a bad player).

DK - Ashbane Failure is the condiment that gives success its flavor.
 
User is online.
Old 05/01/08, 11:09 AM   #2754
Freakz0r
Glass Joe
 
Human Warlock
 
Executus (EU)
Switching Weapons

Hi
First of all this thread has been a great help to me and I'm quite glad with the positive discussion going around here.
However with 2.4.2 on PTR and checking WoR i saw that caster dagger with 0spl dmg and ~230haste, What do u think about this item ? and can u make a macro for example something like this :
#showtooltip Shadowbolt r11
/equip pvp dagger
/stopcasting
/cast shadowbolt r11
/equip ToC
AFAIK spl dmg is only counted when the bolt is released while haste is applied when the cast starts. What do u think of this?
 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 11:14 AM   #2755
toth
Von Kaiser
 
Blood Elf Priest
 
Dragonmaw
Sounds like a sweet hack if you're right :p
 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 11:32 AM   #2756
LockApologist
Piston Honda
 
Blood Elf Death Knight
 
Mug'thol
Originally Posted by Freakz0r View Post
Hi
First of all this thread has been a great help to me and I'm quite glad with the positive discussion going around here.
However with 2.4.2 on PTR and checking WoR i saw that caster dagger with 0spl dmg and ~230haste, What do u think about this item ? and can u make a macro for example something like this :
#showtooltip Shadowbolt r11
/equip pvp dagger
/stopcasting
/cast shadowbolt r11
/equip ToC
AFAIK spl dmg is only counted when the bolt is released while haste is applied when the cast starts. What do u think of this?
Weapon swaps initiate a GCD, more than negating any benefit you might get for slightly higher haste. And, since you're clearly swapping before you cast, you can't hide the swap in cast time.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 11:46 AM   #2757
Turbo Moses
Von Kaiser
 
Turbo Moses's Avatar
 
Undead Warlock
 
Ner'zhul
I just tested it, and yes, haste is calculated at the beginning of spell cast (of course) and spell damage when the bolt is fired. Which means when this weapon comes out, that macro (which SHOULD work) will be absolute hax, as stated. A weapon that 227 haste and 247 damage is absolutely, utterly...I don't even know what to say. It's of course going to be hotfixed quickly, if it isn't before S4. But before it is, take advantage of it.


Ah, didn't know about GCD, I just did it for one cast, which it DOES benefit for, if you made a macro that switched the weapon after each cast, you still get a reduced cast half the time, but also reduced damage. So you'd effectively be getting a weapon with 123.5 damage and 113.5 haste which is still pretty solid.

Last edited by Turbo Moses : 05/01/08 at 6:37 PM.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 12:01 PM   #2758
Smurrf
Si Tibi Narraremus Te Interficere Debemus
 
Smurrf's Avatar
 
Human Paladin
 
Lothar
That macro's worth thinking about. I believe you'd actually have to make two macros to get any kind of use out of it, though, and switch back and forth...and there's a good chance that you'd actually receive less benefit than just using one or the other.

#showtooltip Shadow Bolt
/cast Shadow Bolt
/equip spl dmg dagger

#showtooltip Shadow Bolt
/cast Shadow Bolt
/equip haste dagger

Ideally, you'd be bouncing back and forth between the two macros, so as to get one cast that's extremely hasted with lots more damage, but another cast that would end up not being hasted at all, and also much less damage. I simply am not the number cruncher, so I don't know how this would actually perform. Is it an even split? Does it actually tank your dps a little bit? Or would it actually increase slightly?

A note here though...perhaps you could macro the haste dagger into the end of LT, so that it's all prepped for a swap out at the beginning of a SB spam run. Again, though, not sure how well it'd work out.
This kind of setup, though, is the only way I can see to get continuous casts off without triggering a GCD just to get the hasted weapon into play each time. Anyone else have any better ideas?

Edit: Affliction locks might actually get great use out of this, macroing all their dots to equip the haste dagger at the end, which would set it up to have it on hand for the first SB after refreshing a dot. This would allow their dots to go up quicker (due to lessened GCD), and let them get back to SB'ing.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 2:37 PM   #2759
LockApologist
Piston Honda
 
Blood Elf Death Knight
 
Mug'thol
Originally Posted by Turbo Moses View Post
Ah, didn't know about GCD, I just did it for one cast, which it DOES benefit for, if you made a macro that switched the weapon after each cast, you still get a reduced cast half the time. So you'd effectively be getting a weapon with 247 damage and 113.5 haste, which we can all agree is insane, still.
No, it's not. As you gain a GCD which is much longer than 113.5 or even 227 haste gives you.

You'd have to do a set of macros like Smurff mentions, and I'd bet that having 1 hasted, +dmg bolt and a non-hasted, non-dmg bolt would not be as good as just using one weapon.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 3:58 PM   #2760
pebbles
Glass Joe
 
Blood Elf Warlock
 
Bonechewer
Glowing Shadowsong Amethyst VS Forceful Seaspray Emerald

Which gem would be better at 1500 spell dmage full raid buff and flask.

i was wondering cause haste > spells per point, but would that 1 spell damage make it better then haste stam?
 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 4:10 PM   #2761
clavarnway
Piston Honda
 
clavarnway's Avatar
 
Tauren Warrior
 
Sen'jin
Originally Posted by pebbles View Post
Which gem would be better at 1500 spell dmage full raid buff and flask.

i was wondering cause haste > spells per point, but would that 1 spell damage make it better then haste stam?
Spreadsheet

 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 4:15 PM   #2762
 frmorrison
Divine Protector
 
frmorrison's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by LockApologist View Post
You'd have to do a set of macros like Smurff mentions, and I'd bet that having 1 hasted, +dmg bolt and a non-hasted, non-dmg bolt would not be as good as just using one weapon.
This, I don't see it as a viable idea however it works very well on the first spell cast and after life taps, so it could be a dps boost if you didn't have much static haste, maybe even then with below 120 static haste.

Nuke macro would be:

/cast Nuke
/equip normal Spell damage weapon

Then for Life Tap
/cast Life Tap
/equip 227 Haste weapon (note this will cause a 1.5 second GCD that cannot be changed)

You also could swap to your haste weapon when you are spending 1.5 running away from the many many fires.


It is a good thing much players don't have a 2050 rating, this may cause issues .

DK - Ashbane Failure is the condiment that gives success its flavor.
 
User is online.
Old 05/01/08, 9:10 PM   #2763
Latas
Piston Honda
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Uther
Originally Posted by Flamingcloud View Post
Well If I take my numbers in the spreadsheet and give myself an extra 50 mp5 and remove 25 spell damage (ignoring any kind of stacking debuff) super mana pots come out way way ahead. Only time I could see fel mana pots being better is at the very end if a fight, and only once(so the effective -damage is more like -6).
Shouldn't you actually add something more like 133 in combat mp5 to account for this potion? Basically assuming you use one every 120 seconds it essentially becomes 26.6(repeating) mana per second, then multiply by 5 for mp5 and you get equivalent 133.3(also repeating) mp5 for those 120 seconds.

Please tell me if i missed anything.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/01/08, 9:45 PM   #2764
PSGarak
Bald Bull
 
PSGarak's Avatar
 
Undead Warlock
 
Hyjal
I think he means an additional 50mp/5 in comparison to a normal mana potions, which he would be chugging otherwise.

 
User is offline.
Old 05/02/08, 12:15 AM   #2765
Turbo Moses
Von Kaiser
 
Turbo Moses's Avatar
 
Undead Warlock
 
Ner'zhul
Originally Posted by LockApologist View Post
No, it's not. As you gain a GCD which is much longer than 113.5 or even 227 haste gives you.

You'd have to do a set of macros like Smurff mentions, and I'd bet that having 1 hasted, +dmg bolt and a non-hasted, non-dmg bolt would not be as good as just using one weapon.

Yeah, I realized that after I posted, but if you bound the haste weapon to any spell that is not a main nuke, but uses a GCD (curses, deathcoil, shadowburn, life tap (as posted), healthstones, potions, and anything else you might use), and then had your SB equip your damage weapon, you'd still be getting an overall increase in damage, that, depending on how it's used, could be pretty substantial, You could even bind the weapon swap macro to something close to SB so whenever you're NOT DPSing you could switch, would be a lot of effort, but would honestly be a nice challenge in addition to spamming 1 for shadow destro, and might be a considerable enough increase to be worth it.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/02/08, 11:35 AM   #2766
 frmorrison
Divine Protector
 
frmorrison's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Turbo Moses View Post
healthstones, potions

Be a nice challenge in addition to spamming 1 for shadow destro, and might be a considerable enough increase to be worth it.

HS and potions do not have a GCD, it does seem like a good idea to bind the haste weapon to all GCD spells though.

It does add some complexity to Shadow Destro which would be nice, btw Sunwell raids with 1 Shadow Lock + other Fire Locks is better than all Shadow Locks.

DK - Ashbane Failure is the condiment that gives success its flavor.
 
User is online.
Old 05/02/08, 2:35 PM   #2767
doogless
Don Flamenco
 
doogless's Avatar
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Kil'Jaeden
Does haste gear affect the GCD incurred when you swap weapons?

My concern:
-Let's say I have 7% spell haste (with my normal spell damage weapon), which means a Life Tap takes 1.4 seconds of GCD
-I use my /cast Life Tap /equip Brutal Gladiator's Blade of Alacrity macro
-- If the GCD incurred from weapon swapping isn't shortened by my spell haste gear, then I effectively lost 0.1 seconds on that Life Tap cast. I'll still gain more than that back on my next Shadow Bolt, but it's still something to consider when trying to figure out how much you'd gain by swapping in a haste weapon.

That said, I don't know the mechanics of spell haste and the weapon swapping GCD. If anyone knows (I don't have the gear to test it myself), please set me straight.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/02/08, 3:41 PM   #2768
 frmorrison
Divine Protector
 
frmorrison's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by doogless View Post
Does haste gear affect the GCD incurred when you swap weapons?
No, which does limit the usage of the Spell Haste weapon macro.

DK - Ashbane Failure is the condiment that gives success its flavor.
 
User is online.
Old 05/02/08, 3:57 PM   #2769
Vlar
Von Kaiser
 
Human Death Knight
 
Perenolde
Armory question: I was under the impression that armory's paper doll crit did not include Devestation, since it was not based on the school of magic, but the type.

I was looking over my WWS of a couple nights ago, and out of 772 shadowbolt casts (Edit: hits, not casts), I had a 21% crit rate. My current paper doll crit rate is 20.1%. Was I wrong to think that Devestation is not added to the armory crit?
 
User is offline.
Old 05/02/08, 4:00 PM   #2770
 frmorrison
Divine Protector
 
frmorrison's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Vlar View Post
I was looking over my WWS of a couple nights ago, and out of 772 shadowbolt casts, I had a 21% crit rate. My current paper doll crit rate is 20.1%. Was I wrong to think that Devestation is not added to the armory crit?
You are correct, Devestation does not count for paper doll spell crit. You have an expected crit rate of 25%, but only got 21%.


The reason for that is due to the RNG and the level based crit reduction (between 1-3%).

DK - Ashbane Failure is the condiment that gives success its flavor.
 
User is online.
Old 05/02/08, 4:01 PM   #2771
Trickykid
King Hippo
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Turalyon
Originally Posted by Vlar View Post
Was I wrong to think that Devestation is not added to the armory crit?
No, it's not added in there since that crit rate shows for all spells and Devastation is for destruction spells only.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/02/08, 4:07 PM   #2772
Vlar
Von Kaiser
 
Human Death Knight
 
Perenolde
Originally Posted by frmorrison View Post
You are correct, Devestation does not count for paper doll spell crit. You have an expected crit rate of 25%, but only got 21%.


The reason for that is due to the RNG and the level based crit reduction (between 1-3%).

Ok. Thank you. With the level based crit reduction, does the Spreadsheet happen to take that into account, or should I be lowering my crit on my spreadsheet a bit?
 
User is offline.
Old 05/02/08, 5:19 PM   #2773
Arelenda
Don Flamenco
 
Human Warlock
 
Argent Dawn (EU)
Originally Posted by frmorrison View Post
It does add some complexity to Shadow Destro which would be nice, btw Sunwell raids with 1 Shadow Lock + other Fire Locks is better than all Shadow Locks.
I'm still not convinced this is actually true. Can you back this up with solid facts?
 
User is offline.
Old 05/02/08, 5:26 PM   #2774
Trickykid
King Hippo
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Turalyon
Originally Posted by Arelenda View Post
I'm still not convinced this is actually true. Can you back this up with solid facts?
On the spreadsheet, going between fire and shadow sets/specs the amount fire beats shadow by outweighs the lost DPS from isb by 50-100 with my raid-makeup. I would imagine it's going to differ by raid since that spread is so close.
 
User is offline.
Old 05/02/08, 5:37 PM   #2775
tetracycloide
Don Flamenco
 
tetracycloide's Avatar
 
Human Warlock
 
Quel'dorei
Originally Posted by Trickykid View Post
On the spreadsheet, going between fire and shadow sets/specs the amount fire beats shadow by outweighs the lost DPS from isb by 50-100 with my raid-makeup. I would imagine it's going to differ by raid since that spread is so close.
The spread sheet only models the loss of shadow DPS, not the overall loss of DPS. It will miss factors like the reduction in raid damage lost from the reduced mana returned by shadow priests and raid utilty lost by reduction in health returned by shadow priests.

With the spread being that close and the utility loss I'd say that the actual raid benifit of moving to fire destro is pretty questionable.

My vanity is justified.
 
User is offline.
Closed Thread

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > Class Mechanics > Warlocks

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Holy Raiding Compendium v2 constantius Priests 1472 10/24/08 10:03 AM
[Priest] Holy Raiding Compendium (2.3.x) constantius Class Mechanics 986 04/04/08 1:51 PM