 |
| Welcome to Elitist Jerks |
We're testing some new features on the site regarding OpenID registration and coordination with gamerDNA. If you experience any issues with registering an account, please take the time to fill out a report and send it to this e-mail address. We would appreciate any assistance you could provide in making sure everything is functioning as intended. Thanks!
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community.
|
02/15/08, 10:19 PM
|
#801
|
|
White Power Ranger
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
The effect will occur far more frequently than any clickable trinket on sunwell bosses as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/15/08, 11:28 PM
|
#802
|
|
Bald Bull
Blood Elf Paladin
Darksorrow (EU)
|
Destruction warlocks aren't exactly "non-team-players". Any affliction warlock beyond the first (assuming non-retarded gear level, aka best of kara/badge/crafted at minimum) will be a dps loss to the raid over being destuction (when gear is high enough destruction even outdpses the raid dps benefit of malediction). If you want an imp, you make sure you have an affliction warlock every raid. If people lack consistency, they'll have to either consistently respec (and keep 2 gearsets) or you'll have to live with a suboptimal raid every so often. If you're asking a destruction warlock to camp an imp you're killing raid dps and giving up on shadow embrace which is probably way better than the imp in terms of survivability, on top of an affliction warlock being quite more dps (actual difference depends on gear leve) than a no-sac destruction warlock.
If you don't have an affliction warlock every raid then it's not the warlocks to blame, it's the guild officers that tell who to spec what. Or if you're casual there's nothing you can do really as you'll always have someone missing and end up with a suboptimal raid since you can't coordinate specs and can't force respecs. I wouldn't make up for it by having a destruction warlock put an imp out. Demonology probably loses a lot less though, but why are you raiding with demonology in the firstplace??
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 1:00 AM
|
#803
|
|
Bald Bull
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
BTW, I won't be updating the guide until this stuff goes live. Obviously the devs are doing a decent job retuning stuff - including the commendation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 3:43 AM
|
#804
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
[Girdle of the Fearless] and [Sunguard Legplates]
Datamined recently and speculated to be among the upcoming badge loot (from an unlocked stage of the island). Whatever the source, additional plate options for stacking expertise and generally nice threat/tank pieces.
edit: not an expertise piece, but [Chestplate of Stoicism] may be from 2.4 badges as well.
Last edited by Olon97 : 02/16/08 at 4:04 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 4:35 AM
|
#805
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Anyone else pissed that there doesn't seem to be a dedicated tanking weapon upgrade for us in Sunwell, the badge loot, or the heroic, not even a bad one?
|
Duty is heavier than a mountain, Death is lighter than a feather.
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 5:56 AM
|
#806
|
|
The man in black fled across the desert...
|
As a human, I am liking the Dragonscale sword a great deal. Just because it doesn't have defense on it, doesn't mean it's not a tanking sword.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 6:51 AM
|
#807
|
|
Bald Bull
Blood Elf Paladin
Jaedenar (EU)
|
Originally Posted by Njial
Anyone else pissed that there doesn't seem to be a dedicated tanking weapon upgrade for us in Sunwell, the badge loot, or the heroic, not even a bad one?
|
Not all the new badge loot is datamined yet probably and there still is a pretty big chance we dont know the full loot tables of the first 3 bosses, let alone the 2 locked ones yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 8:57 AM
|
#808
|
|
Rawr
Night Elf Warrior
Proudmoore
|
Still have to wait and see about the weapons, but if there's nothing then mabye Blizzard intends that 1.5 speed sword w/ haste and expertise to be shared by rogues/wars.
With regards to that trinket, I think I posted this in another thread but in it's previous state below 35% health the 20% dodge would put a lot of tanks around 90% avoidance making you nigh invincible every 30 seconds. In its nerfed state it's still quite strong and I'll defiantely be using it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 9:04 AM
|
#809
|
|
Don Flamenco
Orc Death Knight
Stormrage (EU)
|
Originally Posted by Olon97
[Girdle of the Fearless] and [Sunguard Legplates]
Datamined recently and speculated to be among the upcoming badge loot (from an unlocked stage of the island). Whatever the source, additional plate options for stacking expertise and generally nice threat/tank pieces.
edit: not an expertise piece, but [Chestplate of Stoicism] may be from 2.4 badges as well.
|
I wonder if the new expertise items will be better than T5 for a threat set? Since we can pretty much remove all dodges already more is only going to be removing parry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 11:18 AM
|
#810
|
|
Captain Magic
Human Rogue
Argent Dawn (EU)
|
A quick question for those who tank more regularly than I, do you think the new cuttable 4dodge/6stam Nightseye will be worth socketing in red slots where there's a decent socket bonus to be had, or are red slots still basically worthless?
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 12:29 PM
|
#811
|
|
Don Flamenco
Tauren Warrior
Dentarg (EU)
|
The heroic gem is better (5dodge/6sta), but I would still use 5agi/7sta over that. They might also just add an epic cut with 5dodge/7sta later.
There are a few socket bonuses worth using a red gem, mostly those that add 6sta while still being able to socket all other slots with 15sta gems. That would be Illidan helm, T6 helm and the new chest + legs from Sunwell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 1:23 PM
|
#812
|
|
Captain Magic
Human Rogue
Argent Dawn (EU)
|
Originally Posted by Dots
The heroic gem is better (5dodge/6sta), but I would still use 5agi/7sta over that. They might also just add an epic cut with 5dodge/7sta later.
There are a few socket bonuses worth using a red gem, mostly those that add 6sta while still being able to socket all other slots with 15sta gems. That would be Illidan helm, T6 helm and the new chest + legs from Sunwell.
|
Yeah, the heroic gem is better, but requires farming heroics. As for 5agi/7stam, it also seems better, but obviously not everyone has access to epic gems (my guild is 5/5 7/9, but I'm a DPSer so I won't get epic gems for my 'offspec' tank gear), and it seems better than 4agi/6stam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 2:24 PM
|
#813
|
|
Bald Bull
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
Originally Posted by Dots
The heroic gem is better (5dodge/6sta), but I would still use 5agi/7sta over that. They might also just add an epic cut with 5dodge/7sta later.
There are a few socket bonuses worth using a red gem, mostly those that add 6sta while still being able to socket all other slots with 15sta gems. That would be Illidan helm, T6 helm and the new chest + legs from Sunwell.
|
Illidan helm is definitely worth socketting red. I personally have an epic stamina gem in it, but only because I see sockets and throw stamina into them like a monkey flinging poop.
Definitely toss an epic red in that one. AGI vs Dodge is debatable, but agi provides some armor, some crit, some avoidance. Point-for-point though you'll get more avoidance from dodge (still call me strange I like the agi also).
Anyway, when 2.4 goes live I'll probably have to ask for a bit of help updating the gear guide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 3:07 PM
|
#814
|
|
White Power Ranger
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
Originally Posted by GofG
I'm confused; I've heard (and tested, and done the math myself that shows) that Unwavering Leggings are better than T6 because of the 3 gem slots.
Why aren't they?
|
Because Stamina is not the benchmark by which all tanking pieces are measured, especially compared to tanking set pieces.
|
Originally Posted by Dr. Maraudor
Illidan helm is definitely worth socketting red. I personally have an epic stamina gem in it, but only because I see sockets and throw stamina into them like a monkey flinging poop.
Definitely toss an epic red in that one. AGI vs Dodge is debatable, but agi provides some armor, some crit, some avoidance. Point-for-point though you'll get more avoidance from dodge (still call me strange I like the agi also).
|
I've started socketing everything with a minor stam bonus with it's mitigation equivalent gem (exception being 3 socket pieces). They balance hit amounts on non-Tauren tanks, so I can achieve equal health values with more avoidance than my other race counterparts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 3:16 PM
|
#815
|
|
The man in black fled across the desert...
|
Originally Posted by Quigon
Illidan helm is definitely worth socketting red. I personally have an epic stamina gem in it, but only because I see sockets and throw stamina into them like a monkey flinging poop.
|
haha -- Did the same to both T6 and Illidan. 2 stam vs. 5 agility --- 2 stam!! 10 Minutes later. "why did I just do that?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 3:26 PM
|
#816
|
|
White Power Ranger
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
Originally Posted by Jamor
haha -- Did the same to both T6 and Illidan. 2 stam vs. 5 agility --- 2 stam!! 10 Minutes later. "why did I just do that?"
|
To be fair though, I've played his character more than he has apparantly, and he DOES have a 5 agility / 7 stamina gem in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 5:29 PM
|
#817
|
|
Bald Bull
Human Warrior
Turalyon (EU)
|
Taken from the 2.4 discussion thread since this topic seems to stir lots of discussion. This is about Block Rating and about it's usefulness/uselessness.
I think it's pretty much useless in the context of a normal set (it does have it's use in a crush immune set but this is IMO just a novelty and has it's own drawbacks so I'll not focus on that). That means your current avoidance + block is below 102.4%-15%=87.4% because if you are already at this point then BR (and other avoidance) actually eats into your chance to get crushed. Every discussion about BR is in this specific light, if you want to discuss it in a crush immune environment, be my guest, but my post is not about that.
The biggest misconception I have seen is that people think that having lots of BR will reduce your chance to get crushed if you somehow got hit more often than you have SB charges. An example:
|
Originally Posted by suicuique
|
Originally Posted by Lithose
Warriors have an ability called "shield block", it raises their block rating by 75%, so, even with no gear, they become uncrushable. Except on strings of parries, crushes rarely get through.
|
Block rating is not useless ... one reason you cited explicitely. But lets take this to the class mechanics subforum, shall we.
|
Even having lots of BR wouldn't save you there; if a boss wants to crush you, he will crush you because crushing blows basically override everything. BR here would only have eaten into a normal hit but not a crush.
So yeah, what do you think of BR? It's quite useless IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 5:44 PM
|
#818
|
|
Slayer of Tanks
|
Yep block rating is useless except when stacking it specifically for some sort of gimmick fight. I am so, so happy blizzard has not included block rating on the new tank gear and is giving us boatloads of dodge, parry, defense, and expertise. "offset" tank pieces are still fine to put block rating on - and they're doing a bit of that. (The shoulders. I think most tanks wouldn't use them right now, and would stick with T6 - especially those that managed to get a sapphiron enchant for their onslaught). Although now if they upgrade the armor of the shoulders they might be pretty damn good. That massive block value is quite a bit of mitigation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 6:00 PM
|
#819
|
|
Piston Honda
Tauren Warrior
The Venture Co
|
|
So yeah, what do you think of BR? It's quite useless IMO.
|
Uses for BR:
-Farming the belfs on the BT steps.
-Running around in content below your gear level. Every block is +1 rage.
That's all I can think of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 6:05 PM
|
#820
|
|
Bald Bull
Blood Elf Paladin
Darksorrow (EU)
|
AOE tanking will also benefit from block rating, as not only will shield block be down most of the time, the mobs in certain cases actually hit weak enough for a block to reduce a significant amount of the damage. Nothing I'd gear for, though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 6:10 PM
|
#821
|
|
Slayer of Tanks
|
Exactly. Gimmick shit that really doesn't matter a damn anyway. Oh look I can solo old content or non elite mobs or super easy things or can have all these mostly-easy elites in this Raid Instance hitting me and take no damage, too bad the paladin tank is going to have to truly tank them so we can aoe and kill them anyway!
I just read that 2.4 notes thread and the mass amount of uninformed people there is amazing. Lots of people just flat out clueless and wrong and spreading misinformation. Game is hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 6:12 PM
|
#822
|
|
Bald Bull
Human Warrior
Turalyon (EU)
|
Originally Posted by galzohar
AOE tanking will also benefit from block rating, as not only will shield block be down most of the time, the mobs in certain cases actually hit weak enough for a block to reduce a significant amount of the damage. Nothing I'd gear for, though...
|
The only thing I could think of were those mobs in the Illidan's harem (Concubines and such). You can actually fully block the stuff they throw at you easily but unfortunately they stun so it doesn't really matter what gear you wear :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 6:25 PM
|
#823
|
|
Candied Tangerines
Blood Elf Death Knight
Mal'Ganis
|
Almost all the new armor values for the 2.4 stuff is wrong. It looks like Blizzard took existing items (most glaringly T1 Eng Goggles and ilevel 128-151 plate) and increased their item budget without updating (read: increase!) their armor values for all the new gear. The T2 engineering goggles have the exact same armor as the T1 goggles. The T6.5 DPS chest (1728) actually has less armor than both Glory of the Defender (1765) and T6 chest (1825). Doesn't it seem odd that Kil'jaeden drops would have the same armor as the Illidan helm? So for the time being, I wouldn't try to compare items by their armor.
Another thing: the rogue gear spreadsheet shows that Blade of Savagery is superior to Dragonscale-encrusted Longblade for DPS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 6:44 PM
|
#824
|
|
Slayer of Tanks
|
I read that blizzard acknowledged the armor values are a bug, however, I have no idea where the blue post is. And searching on wowblues seems futile. If anyone has the link, it would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16/08, 7:01 PM
|
#825
|
|
Bald Bull
Night Elf Warrior
Sargeras
|
To play the Devil's Advocate for a second regarding Shield Block Rating.
Block Rating is still the cheapest of all the defensive stats in terms of item budget on just about any item.
While it may seem gimmicky to become an uncrushable tank, it's also easiest if you use items with block rating, the new meta gem next patch gives you a free 10% Block, I'd argue that without having to sacrifice much of anything and using maybe 2-3 items with block rating, you'd be able to become uncrushable with ease while still having over 20k+ HP in a raid environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| Protection and you! |
Chicken |
Paladins |
2705 |
11/14/08 6:05 AM |
| Protection Spec |
Quest |
Public Discussion |
52 |
02/13/06 7:20 PM |
|