Concerning the new trinket, I do not see what keeps us as treating it exactly like Mjolnir before. Gear until you reach the soft cap of ArP around 55-60% (don't know the exact numbers now) and for the rest, go purely STR.
I suspect we will not have tooooo much ArP if we not gem for it and only use the one thats on the gear itself.


By the way, I got [Bryntroll, the Bone Arbiter] last night. So far, procc accumulates for about 3-4% dmg as a fury warrior in Saurfang battle. Not that bad imho.

Ok, I agree with you there, but going for a passive 100% ArP is also out of the question I think.

Do we know, how the proccs are distributed? So, does it really "randomly" procc one of the 3 buffs, or do they get procced one after another?

I also think, that the 30sec procc, in comparison with the normal 15sec procc, gives us more possibilities for timing other things with it, like Death Wish. In theory, it should even be possible to time them exactly the same, each CD, because they both should share about 2mins (Fury).

Is the link for the spreadsheet on the front page the updated link for 3.3 or is it not out yet? Still says its 3.2.2 so im just checkin to make sure, im lost without this spreadsheet lol..some of the new heroics weapons are some pieces are looking fairly decent and would like to check them out

EDIT: And if it is the updated link..when will it be fixed because right now iim getting a page load error when i try to download

What do you mean when you say "going for 100% ArP is ... out of the question"? Do you mean that it doesn't make sense to go for the ArP cap when using this trinket, as any ArP procs are completely wasted? Or do you mean that it's not realistic to shoot for passively capping ArP? If it's the former, then either you cap the stat and the other procs make up for the wasted proc (doubtful), or you use the trinket, gear your passive ArP around the 600/700 ArP proc, and jip yourself out of a load of benefit from more passive ArP. If it's the latter...

It forces a crummy gear setup, either way you slice it. I'm convinced that there's some crucial information that we're missing here, similar to the early reactions to the (now modified) Needle-Encrusted Scorpion.

LtSplinter, Landsoul will update his post with the 3.3 version when he is finished with it, is my guess. I've asked him to send me the sheet and I will upload it to my website again.

For the time being, the current 3.2 version is linked underneath the filefront link on the first page of this thread for those that were asking for it previously, and according to my web traffic, it's been downloaded more than a few times .

Here it is again, incase you're lazy and dont want to go back to the first page :P

http://www.ekagaming.com/landsoul/Wa...03Excel07.xlsm

Gemming for hard cap on Arp is probably going to be the way to go as far as Fury goes anyway, since so much of the gear in ICC has arp on it.

My guess is the Deathbringer's Trinket will still be better than all other trinkets even with the one and a half wasted procs. It's that silly. 30 second duration 105 second ICD is about under 30% uptime between all 3 procs. That's ~9% uptime for 700 STR, and ~9% uptime for 700 crit.

To reiterate, it's a stupidly good trinket with stupid good procs even if one of them is completely useless. Just think about popping deathwish with over 2k extra AP or 14% extra crit?!?!?

The reason the graph is "choppy" is because of teh nature of DW. If your time between crits is an integer value, DW will tick normally (i.e once per second) but at off integer values it will tick at a diminishing rate, thus the peaks at values like .2, .25, .5, etc. If the choppiness of the graph is really a concern, also remember that this is only going to effect those wearing 2 t10 pieces, thus their CPS will most likely be above .5, thus the graph now is fairly linear.

Unless I am missing something in the mechanics of DW and the refreshing of it with later crits, the formula posted should be accurate.

Well let's say we can't use Average Crits Per Second. Let's say you have over 1.0 crits per second. Based on averages, you will never get a single deep wound off, when it's truely the case that there is a chance where you won't crit for more than a second.

Maybe I should treat it like flurry uptime, which is based on the probability of noncrits within the duration of the flurry buff... where instead of the flurry duration I should use 1.0 seconds instead of around 3-4 seconds for flurry. It would look like the flipped version of flurry uptime with crit scaling.

Will has a 105 second ICD, so about a 28% uptime between the 3 procs. Also, isn't the 264 trinket give 600 of X stat?

The following video showing the procs, YouTube - Deathbringer's Will can be considered as proof, there's no scene change between the first two and procs from the first guy being showed.