Advertise Here
Disable Ads
Elitist Jerks
»
Search Forums
Search Results
Username
Remember me?
Password
Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
>
Last »
Showing results 1 to 50 of 156
Search took
0.02
seconds.
Search:
Posts Made By:
Borodin
Forum:
Warriors
08/13/09, 7:47 AM
Replies:
921
Finalizing the Prot Warrior design
Views:
688,904
Posted By
Borodin
Now that CC is back in the PvE game in a limited...
Now that CC is back in the PvE game in a limited form, an AoE DoT would present some control problems (as TC Crits with Deep Wounds do now).
I wondered if that was the reason Bloodbatch (the AoE...
Forum:
Warriors
07/16/09, 7:47 PM
Replies:
921
Finalizing the Prot Warrior design
Views:
688,904
Posted By
Borodin
I'm not on the PTR so genuinely don't want to...
I'm not on the PTR so genuinely don't want to speculate too much about this entry in the updated 3.2 Patch Notes:
Warrior (3.1 Skills List / 3.1 Talent + Glyph Calc.)
Devastate: Weapon damage and...
Forum:
Warriors
06/29/09, 8:07 AM
Replies:
921
Finalizing the Prot Warrior design
Views:
688,904
Posted By
Borodin
I had the Shockwave (and Chopper Sonic Horn...
I had the Shockwave (and Chopper Sonic Horn attack) bug weeks ago and raised a ticket, it's also been reported via the EU Bug forums complete with screenshots and other logs.
Neither rebooting nor...
Forum:
Warriors
06/24/09, 9:32 AM
Replies:
921
Finalizing the Prot Warrior design
Views:
688,904
Posted By
Borodin
Indeed the Dual Wield Miss Penalty is often not...
Indeed the Dual Wield Miss Penalty is often not applied to bosses, instead of such a random element they tune the damage output by setting the speed and swing values where they want them.
Forum:
Warlocks
05/20/09, 8:00 AM
Replies:
3,035
SimulationCraft for Warlocks (4.0.3a numbers at 80 and 85)
Views:
3,750,693
Posted By
Borodin
Without being able to put numbers on it right now...
Without being able to put numbers on it right now I can give your brief answers as I've been following developments closely:
1. Firestone is better for deep Destruction due to the vast majority of...
Forum:
Warlocks
05/19/09, 8:40 AM
Replies:
3,035
SimulationCraft for Warlocks (4.0.3a numbers at 80 and 85)
Views:
3,750,693
Posted By
Borodin
The talent/spell always did - the Glyph was going...
The talent/spell always did - the Glyph was going to change but they canned that proposed change. So with the (mandatory) Conflag Glyph in place your Conflags won't consume Immolate.
Note there's no...
Forum:
Warlocks
05/08/09, 9:59 AM
Replies:
3,035
SimulationCraft for Warlocks (4.0.3a numbers at 80 and 85)
Views:
3,750,693
Posted By
Borodin
The Front Page shows that 0/40/31 is slightly...
The Front Page shows that 0/40/31 is slightly ahead of 0/41/30 - but it's so close you might want to go off personal playstyle/experience between those two.
Forum:
Warlocks
05/05/09, 10:19 AM
Replies:
3,035
SimulationCraft for Warlocks (4.0.3a numbers at 80 and 85)
Views:
3,750,693
Posted By
Borodin
The irony of this Glyph debate is that it's...
The irony of this Glyph debate is that it's taking place on a SimCraft Thread where we have the very tool needed to confirm which Glyphs are optimal.
I can see both sides of the debate but think I...
Forum:
Warlocks
05/02/09, 10:02 PM
Replies:
3,035
SimulationCraft for Warlocks (4.0.3a numbers at 80 and 85)
Views:
3,750,693
Posted By
Borodin
With the newest changes lending a 15% bonus to...
With the newest changes lending a 15% bonus to Incinerate damage I wonder if the Glyph of Incinerate needs re-assessing against the default line-up of Conflag, Immolate and Life Tap.
Forum:
Warlocks
03/03/09, 10:39 AM
Replies:
3,035
SimulationCraft for Warlocks (4.0.3a numbers at 80 and 85)
Views:
3,750,693
Posted By
Borodin
Yes Exhaustion is changed to 10m in 3.1, the...
Yes Exhaustion is changed to 10m in 3.1, the cooldown on the spell itself reduced to 5m.
Certainly that's how it was stated in the Patch Notes thus far.
Forum:
Warriors
02/24/09, 9:02 AM
Replies:
545
Official 3.1 changes and discussion
Views:
281,699
Posted By
Borodin
Apparrently the TG -10% Damage entry has now been...
Apparrently the TG -10% Damage entry has now been removed from the Patch Notes. Might return but in the context of more complete patch notes rather than what the larger community perceived as an...
Forum:
Warriors
02/24/09, 6:25 AM
Replies:
545
Official 3.1 changes and discussion
Views:
281,699
Posted By
Borodin
Reserving any kind of judgement since there's so...
Reserving any kind of judgement since there's so little announced and what there is lacks context: e.g. we know there's changes to Stances, Heroic Strike, possibly Rage on Parry/Dodge and a lot more...
Forum:
Warlocks
02/24/09, 5:39 AM
Replies:
739
3.1 Patch notes discussion
Views:
288,086
Posted By
Borodin
"but one question, any ideas on how new siphon...
"but one question, any ideas on how new siphon life works for healing? I assume you couldn't just spam corruption on a target and constantly get instant heals, what are the restrictions to it?"
I...
Forum:
Warriors
02/19/09, 9:40 AM
Replies:
921
Finalizing the Prot Warrior design
Views:
688,904
Posted By
Borodin
Tamral, where are you getting your "TPS = 1.5x...
Tamral, where are you getting your "TPS = 1.5x our DPS...." figure from?
With Defensive Stance converting each point of damage into 2.07 threat then double our DPS + Static values would indeed be...
Forum:
Warriors
02/18/09, 9:39 AM
Replies:
921
Finalizing the Prot Warrior design
Views:
688,904
Posted By
Borodin
Well they almost removed the Defensive damage...
Well they almost removed the Defensive damage penalty through Improved Defensive Stance which gives you back a near-constant 10% damage boost while tanking.
Alas this does not help the Rage/DPS and...
Forum:
Warlocks
01/23/09, 7:55 AM
Replies:
1,399
The Mage Equivalent: The Destruction Warlock
Views:
2,337,121
Posted By
Borodin
One of the things that sets the EJ forum apart is...
One of the things that sets the EJ forum apart is that there is some attention paid to spelling and grammar. That higher standard is made clear when you sign up.
Politely correcting someone is hardly...
Forum:
Warriors
01/21/09, 7:54 AM
Replies:
25
DeepWounds and you
Views:
28,055
Posted By
Borodin
Well simply because double dipping exacerbates...
Well simply because double dipping exacerbates any other issues there may be with Deep Wounds.
And if Blizzard have overlooked it their assessment of the talent may be incorrect and cause them to...
Forum:
Warlocks
01/21/09, 5:47 AM
Replies:
351
Highest DPS specs after patch
Views:
249,485
Posted By
Borodin
That forum is a mixed bag at the moment (some...
That forum is a mixed bag at the moment (some even claiming a DPS gain) but 2 things stood out for me:
1. If Affliction DPS has dropped overall this may indicate some of the "fixes" were indeed...
Forum:
Class Mechanics
01/15/09, 9:10 AM
Replies:
93
[FAQ]Working theories of raiding at level 80
Views:
110,648
Posted By
Borodin
Multiplicative. Consider 2 buffs to damage of...
Multiplicative.
Consider 2 buffs to damage of "20%":
If these are applied Additively : 100% + 20% + 20% = 140% net damage
If these are applied Multiplicatively: 100% x 1.2 x 1.2 = 144% net...
Forum:
Warlocks
01/13/09, 10:13 AM
Replies:
351
Highest DPS specs after patch
Views:
249,485
Posted By
Borodin
What's the new base damage and co-eff. on Chaos...
What's the new base damage and co-eff. on Chaos Bolt? I keep seeing it referred to here but I've seen no numbers for the increase nor seen it mentioned in patch notes.
I levelled as deep destruction...
Forum:
Warriors
12/08/08, 7:45 AM
Replies:
67
In-Depth Protection DPS Discussion
Views:
62,220
Posted By
Borodin
More anecdotal "contribution": on reading this I...
More anecdotal "contribution": on reading this I spent some time on the Dummies using my 4 different weapons in different configs. of DW and 1H+Shield.
Ultimately the differences were minimal (as...
Forum:
Warriors
10/22/08, 4:46 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
My assumption on the Armour is that they would...
My assumption on the Armour is that they would have had the equivalent armour values to generate the same Damage Reduction at 83 vs a Level 80 Player as for a Level 73 Boss vs 70 player.
Currently I...
Forum:
Warriors
10/10/08, 11:32 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Well of course 3% less miss means more DPS from...
Well of course 3% less miss means more DPS from specials. No additional rage income though as that comes from white damage done or damage taken.
Of course with 3% more yellows landing you will waste...
Forum:
Warriors
10/07/08, 10:01 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
I am being optimistic - sure the core of tanking...
I am being optimistic - sure the core of tanking will be a lot easier but the metagame of maximising TPS or just plain using abilities creatively is still there and therefore the ability to stand out...
Forum:
Warriors
10/03/08, 6:57 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Block chance is more important to us now: 2 rage...
Block chance is more important to us now: 2 rage on a block, Critical Block, Damage Shield and Improved Defensive Stance are all effects that benefit from more Block chance.
That's why I will...
Forum:
Warriors
10/01/08, 11:06 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Well the way Devastate applied Sunder threat was...
Well the way Devastate applied Sunder threat was actually a mystery to the masses (I knew how it worked, you knew how it worked, but how often did you get blank stares when you pointed out it applied...
Forum:
Warriors
10/01/08, 10:34 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Satrina's testing has so far shown that Devastate...
Satrina's testing has so far shown that Devastate works the way I said i.e. it still applies Sunder Armour but not Sunder threat (previously you got the Sunder threat up until you had stacked...
Forum:
Warriors
10/01/08, 8:31 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Confirmed and post edited :) -Soloman Hmm I...
Confirmed and post edited :)
-Soloman
Hmm I remember 1H Spec being buggy a few builds back but right now my sheet calculates the ideal that all bonuses are active and working correctly so 0.9...
Forum:
Warriors
10/01/08, 4:47 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Threat Values on a Hit (including potential from Crits)
Estimating final Threat Values for hits including crit potential.
This is an update to a post I made some weeks ago, updated following work done by Satrina (Tankspot) and build 9014...
Forum:
Warriors
09/30/08, 10:09 AM
Replies:
143
Tanking Spreadsheet
Views:
93,542
Posted By
Borodin
Whitetooth has concluded Miss from Defence is...
Whitetooth has concluded Miss from Defence is affected by DR too (see the Combat Ratings thread) so probably a change for a future release.
Forum:
Warriors
09/30/08, 9:12 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
2 AP per 360 Armour per talent point = 6 AP when...
2 AP per 360 Armour per talent point = 6 AP when fully talented; Prinsesa was right.
At my guess of 30,000 Armour for a geared Level 80 that's a neat 500AP.
Forum:
Warriors
09/30/08, 8:53 AM
Replies:
143
Tanking Spreadsheet
Views:
93,542
Posted By
Borodin
Talia, have you caught the changes to Armoured to...
Talia, have you caught the changes to Armoured to the Teeth? Now 2 AP per 360 Armour rather than 1 Str per 400.
Forum:
Warriors
09/30/08, 5:45 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
I don't think you can even self-cast it. If you...
I don't think you can even self-cast it. If you can not sure if the 3-hit duration is still current.
Forum:
Warriors
09/30/08, 4:53 AM
Replies:
2,271
The Protection Guide
Views:
1,861,587
Posted By
Borodin
Thanks, I'd been wondering if the Sunder element...
Thanks, I'd been wondering if the Sunder element of Devastate benefited from the Sunder Glyph (I assumed it would but you never know quite how the logic would interact).
Thanks for the warning to all...
Forum:
Warriors
09/29/08, 11:05 AM
Replies:
2,271
The Protection Guide
Views:
1,861,587
Posted By
Borodin
Back to Glyphs, Resonating Power is now redundant...
Back to Glyphs, Resonating Power is now redundant as the target-limit has been lifted from Thunderclap.
So considering what I might use now:
Major
Glyph of Blocking is pretty much a no brainer -...
Forum:
Warriors
09/29/08, 10:46 AM
Replies:
2,271
The Protection Guide
Views:
1,861,587
Posted By
Borodin
Devastate is Attack Speed Normalised (2.4) -...
Devastate is Attack Speed Normalised (2.4) - remember it's contribution from AP that's normalised not the weapon damage so yes a slower weapon with a higher damage per swing will do more damage per...
Forum:
Warriors
09/26/08, 8:49 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Yes Executioner is still a flat -840 Armour. This...
Yes Executioner is still a flat -840 Armour. This essentially gives it built-in negative scaling beyond 70 since target armour values will be increasing as you level whilst the enchant remains...
Forum:
Warriors
09/17/08, 10:43 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Vigilance has a 30 minute duration or 3 hits. The...
Vigilance has a 30 minute duration or 3 hits. The 3 hit limit is designed precisely so you can't grant 5% dodge to another tank (also dropping their threat 10%). If you there was no 3-hit limit 2...
Forum:
Warriors
09/16/08, 4:26 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
As far as I am concerned rage on Dodge/Parry...
As far as I am concerned rage on Dodge/Parry never made it into the build yet. I watch this very closely and from memory here's how it broke down:
Stalwart Protector talent granted 2 rage per...
Forum:
Warriors
09/12/08, 10:39 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
I think that while the actual value of the Hit...
I think that while the actual value of the Hit penalty is probably too much, counterbalancing the talent itself is needed in reference to the value of a single talent point, even a "gold medal" 51...
Forum:
Warriors
09/11/08, 9:36 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Zegai - Blizzard say Salvation has now been...
Zegai - Blizzard say Salvation has now been "added" to Defensive Stance. We don't know the details for sure but we are assuming that like Defiance it's just been added onto the Stance Threat for a...
Forum:
Warriors
09/11/08, 8:00 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Looking at the new Devastate there's no mention...
Looking at the new Devastate there's no mention of inherant threat or extra threat per Sunder so I am confidently assuming those have been removed in favour of a pure damage to threat attack (except...
Forum:
Warriors
09/10/08, 8:55 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Since we now have an idea about how AP effects...
Since we now have an idea about how AP effects several of our attacks I wanted to start looking at the threat we would get per attack if the talent/mechanics patch went in today.
My figures are all...
Forum:
Warriors
09/09/08, 8:41 PM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Rustik if your in the beta are you not able to...
Rustik if your in the beta are you not able to quickly see if Improved TC effecs the 12% AP too?
For example at 2,000 AP it will add either 240 OR 480 damage to the base 600 attack. Attacking mob a...
Forum:
Warriors
09/08/08, 9:40 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
" Looking more closely at these spells on...
"
Looking more closely at these spells on Wowhead, they read:
For 1-h: [Apply Aura]: Mod Dmg % (1) Value: 10
For 2-h: [Apply Aura]: Mod Dmg % (1) Value: 5
"
I think that's pretty conclusive that...
Forum:
Warriors
09/07/08, 10:10 PM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Thunderclap threat is 175% damage in Live (Ghost...
Thunderclap threat is 175% damage in Live (Ghost has remembered incorrectly) so the base threat has been more than halved.
The damage has increased 50% but since the cooldown also increased 50%...
Forum:
Warriors
09/07/08, 11:08 AM
Replies:
2,271
The Protection Guide
Views:
1,861,587
Posted By
Borodin
Legaia, Is this argument assuming that before...
Legaia,
Is this argument assuming that before doing any Heroic Strikes or Cleaves rage is being expended on instant threat moves like SS, Revenge or Dev? i.e. are we talking about dumping excess...
Forum:
Warriors
09/06/08, 9:15 PM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
Darkrenown, I've only just caught sight of this...
Darkrenown,
I've only just caught sight of this potential boost to Defensive Stance.
I think there's 3 ways you can interpret the comments about Salvation modfier being "baked in"
1. Every non...
Forum:
Warriors
09/06/08, 9:19 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
It won't because the Devastate code just does not...
It won't because the Devastate code just does not allow 2 or even 1 "Sunder stack" to cast when 5 Sunders are present.
If you read the Devastate tooltip now it says "causes the Sunder Armour...
Forum:
Warriors
09/06/08, 8:52 AM
Replies:
3,508
WotLK talent Preview/Discussion
Views:
677,165
Posted By
Borodin
I don't agree right now I see this Glyph as a...
I don't agree right now I see this Glyph as a minor one which simply cuts down the time taken to reach 5 Sunders (the threat of your first 2 Devastates are indeed boosted significantly by a whole...
Showing results 1 to 50 of 156
Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
>
Last »
Ten Ton Hammer Network
EVE
GW2
Spark
SWToR
WoW
Contact Us
Privacy Policy